scholarly journals Open access ensures effective information retrieval of medical literature in e-databases

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
NC Jain

Objetivo: Realizar uma análise crítica dos protocolos de reabilitação vestibular voltados para indivíduos diagnosticados com hipofunção vestibular, com base em artigos científicos. Métodos: Trata-se de uma revisão de literatura sobre os protocolos de reabilitação para indivíduos que possuem hipofunção vestibular, utilizando para a pesquisa as bases de dados eletrônicas SCIELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online), MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Directory of Open Access Journals, World Wide Science, ScienceDirect e PUBMED (Public Medline or Publisher Medline) em um corte temporal de 2007 a 2019. Foram selecionados estudos na língua portuguesa, utilizando como descritores: Reabilitação; Qualidade de Vida; Doenças Vestibulares; Equilíbrio Postural; Canais Semicirculares e seus correspondentes na língua inglesa e espanhola. Resultados: Durante a busca, a triagem foi composta por 45 artigos, porém a amostra remanescente foi de 18 artigos. Observou-se que a idade média foi de 56,94 e o número médio de sessões/ tempo realizadas para melhora satisfatória destes pacientes foi de 13,42/ 8 semanas, bem como os protocolos de reabilitação vestibular variavam entre o tratamento convencional e não convencional incluindo realidade virtual, posturografia e dispositivo portátil de capacete com frequência semanal média de atendimento de quatro vezes. Conclusão: Os estudos realizados apontam diferentes tipos de protocolos de reabilitação vestibular, os quais são realizados de maneira convencional e não convencional e que possuem resultados positivos diante das desordens relatadas pelos sujeitos. Dessa forma, a fisioterapia representa uma importante ferramenta para o tratamento das vestibulopatias. Ademais, a escassez de estudos voltados para a temática abordada neste trabalho evidencia a necessidade de mais pesquisas sobre a atuação da fisioterapia na hipofunção vestibular.


CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S70-S71
Author(s):  
D. Ting ◽  
B. Bailey ◽  
F. Scheuermeyer ◽  
T. Chan ◽  
D. Harris

Introduction: The ways in which Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians interact with the medical literature has been transformed with the rise of Free Open Access Medical Education (FOAM). Although nearly all residents use FOAM resources, some criticize the lack of universal quality assurance. This problem is a particular risk for trainees who have many time constraints and incompletely developed critical appraisal skills. One potential safeguard is journal club, which is used by virtually all EM residency programs in North America to review new literature. However, EM resident perspectives have not been studied. Our research objective was to describe how residents perceive journal club to influence how they translate the medical literature into their clinical practice. Our research question was whether FOAM has influenced residents’ goals and perceived value of journal club. Methods: We developed a semi-structured interview script in conjunction with a methods expert and refined it via pilot testing. Following constructivist grounded theory, and using both purposive and theoretical sampling, we conducted a focus group (n = 7) and 18 individual interviews with EM residents at the 4 training sites of the University of British Columbia. In total, we analyzed 920 minutes of recorded audio. Two authors independently coded each transcript, with discrepancies reconciled by discussion and consensus. Constant comparative analysis was performed. We conducted return of findings through public presentations. Results: We found evidence that journal club works as a community of practice with a progression of roles from junior to senior residents. Participants described journal club as a safe venue to compare practice patterns and to gain insight into the practical wisdom of their peers and mentors. The social and academic activities present at journal club interacted positively to foster this environment. In asking residents about ways that journal club accelerates knowledge translation, we actually found that residents cite journal club as a quality check to prevent premature adoption of new research findings. Residents are hesitant to adopt new literature into their practice without positive validation, which can occur during journal club. Conclusion: Journal club functions as a community of practice that is valued by residents. Journal club is a primary way that new evidence can be validated before being put into practice, and may act as quality assurance in the era of FOAM.


I was born and raised in a medical family surrounded by physicians of various specialities and their friends. Although I dreamed of becoming a conductor of a symphony orchestra, my destiny was quite predetermined (genetically as well as epigenetically). So, I became a cardiologist. Right at the beginning of my career at the university hospital, I was told by senior physicians that to become a good medical professional you must read one clinical case report per day, at least. Indeed, it is not easy to see diverse patients every day and keep reading the medical literature. Eventually, I realized that following this rule I could easily come up with an initial diagnosis and selection of the right therapy for my patients. Clearly, clinical case reports remain an essential part of lifelong learning in medicine, contributing greatly to the progress of health care. That is why ScienceOpen aggregated extensive content from the medical literature published Open Access in the last 5-7 years and offers this invaluable material freely for every health care professional in the world. Another important aspect of continuing medical education involves the role of mentoring. Mentorship during the medical career can have an exceptional impact both professionally as well as personally. Supporting self-esteem and the importance of lifelong learning, a good mentor empowers a positive attitude and promotes the development of more open and flexible mindsets in medical trainees.  As a great example, I would like to mention a weekly clinical case reports discussion called clinical journal club presented by Professor Friedrich C. Luft, Director of the Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC) at Charité and Max Delbrück Center in the Helmholtz Association in Berlin to his colleagues, physicians and researchers in a freely available open format: http://www.charite-buch.de/. During my own training as a physician-scientist, I met a few outstanding senior colleagues, unique leaders and incredible personalities such as Professor Mirsaid M. Mirrakhimov, Professor Rainer Dietz, Professor Detlev Ganten, and Professor Friedrich C. Luft. Now, Professor Friedrich C. Luft and I decided to initiate a special Open Access collection of clinical case reports across all medical disciplines. Friedrich Luft has expressed his thoughts and ideas on the Clinical Case Reports Collection in this short video:  https://youtu.be/XKKxxlPuUwM So, why should clinical case reports be published? Here are the top 4 reasons to publish clinical case reports Open Access: Everyone can learn about interesting and unique disease manifestations and diagnostic methods, Everyone can get an invaluable first-hand source of evidence about general and novel therapeutic approaches across the globe, It helps to discover life threatening adverse reactions to medications, Used in practice to exchange information and generate a more expanded search for evidence We hereby would like to encourage every medical doctor, nurse and health care professional to share their clinical knowledge and discuss openly and cross-border their thoughts to generate new research and hypotheses. This becomes even more important with the rise of the Open Access movement and has an invaluable role in disseminating knowledge. So, welcome to the clinical case reports collection and unlock your education, doc!


2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Djoerd Hiemstra

On 31 March 2021, the Wednesday morning of ECIR 2021, the conference participants joined with seven panellists in a discussion on Open Access and Information Retrieval (IR), or more accurately, on the lack of open access publishing in IR. Discussion topics included the experience of researchers with open access in Africa; business models for open access, in particular how to run a sustainable open access conference like ECIR; open access plans at Springer, the BCS and the ACM; and finally, experience with open access publishing in related fields, notably in Computational Linguistics.


Author(s):  
Keiichi Nakata ◽  
Amrish Singh

In this chapter the authors examine the use of collaborative classification to support social information retrieval by organizing search results. It subscribes to the view that the activity of collaborative classification can be characterized by top-down and bottom-up approaches, both in terms of the nature of concept classification and the process of classification development. Two approaches, collaborative indexing and search result classification based on shared classification schemes, are described and compared. It suggests that by allowing open access to classification development tools to generate shared classification schemes, which in turn become collaborative artifacts, cooperating user groups will generate their own coordination mechanisms that are not dependent on the system itself.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henning Müller ◽  
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer ◽  
Charles E. Kahn, Jr. ◽  
William Hersh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document