Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation of sealing ability of MTA and EndoSequence as root-end filling materials with chitosan and carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC) as retrograde smear layer removing agents

ABSTRACT Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the amount of residual smear layer after root canal instrumentation by using Ni-Ti, M-Wire, and CM-Wire instruments. Materials and Methods: Seventy-two mandibular incisors were randomly divided into six groups according to the system used: WaveOne (WO), Reciproc (RP), Unicone (UC), ProTaper Next (PN), Mtwo (MT), and HyFlex (HF). Afterward, the specimens were cleaved in the mesiodistal and buccolingual direction for analysis by scanning electron microscopy. Results: Considering both directions and root canal thirds, there was no difference between HF, MT, and PN. RP, UC, and WO presented a significant difference between the directions, and the cervical third showed a significantly smaller quantity of residual smear layer compared with the apical third. When the systems were compared among them, there was a significant difference only between RP and WO. Conclusions: Residual smear layer observed after instrumentation with the different systems was similar, except for quantities between the reciprocating systems.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of Residual Dentin after Conventional and Chemomechanical Caries Removal Using SEM

Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry ◽

10.17796/jcpd.32.2.44n2787118133880 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 32 (2) ◽

pp. 115-120 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Fernanda Nahás Pires Corrêa ◽

Leonardo Eloy Rodrigues Filho ◽

Célia Regina Martins Delgado Rodrigues

Keyword(s):

Electron Microscopy ◽

Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽

In Vitro Study ◽

Adhesive System ◽

Smear Layer ◽

Dentinal Tubules ◽

Removal Method ◽

Caries Removal ◽

Scanning Electron

The purpose of this in vitro study was to analyze the residual dentinal surfaces following caries removal using rotatory instruments and two chemomechanical methods (Papacárie® and Carisolv®), by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Thirty primary incisors were divided into three groups, according to the caries removal method used, and their residual dentin was examined under SEM (15). After caries removal, 15 of these teeth were restored with Single Bond (3M) adhesive system and Z100 Filtek composite resin (3M). The tags of the replicas were observed under SEM. The chemomechanical caries removal methods (Papacárie®and Carisolv®) formed an amorphous layer, similar to the smear layer and few exposed dentinal tubules;the conventional caries removal method produced a smooth and regular dentinal surface, with typical smear layer and exposed dentinal tubules. All groups showed abundant tag formation. Scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed a difference between dentin treated with rotatory instruments and that treated with chemomechanical methods in spite of the occurrence of a similar tag formation in both groups.

Download Full-text

Radiographic and scanning electron microscopic assessment of root canal filling remnants after endodontic re-instrumentation

Brazilian Dental Science ◽

10.14295/bds.2017.v20i1.1325 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

pp. 80 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Luciane Geanini Pena Santos ◽

Wilson Tadeu Felippe ◽

Beatriz Dulcineia Mendes Souza ◽

Andrea Cristina Konrath ◽

Mabel Mariela Rodríguez Cordeiro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Electron Microscopy ◽

Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽

Root Canal ◽

Filling Material ◽

Root Canal Filling ◽

Root Canals ◽

Filling Materials ◽

Ah Plus ◽

Endodontic Retreatment ◽

Scanning Electron

Objective: Failures in endodontic treatment may occur by several reasons. Endodontic retreatment is an interesting alternative to manage this clinical problem. However, it is not possible to completely remove the root canal filling by any current retreatment technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of residual root canal filling materials after endodontic re-instrumentation. Material and Methods: Sixty extracted anterior human teeth were prepared by step-back technique with Flexofiles, K-files and Gates-Glidden (GG) burs. Between the use of each file or bur, root canals were irrigated with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Smear layer was removed by irrigation with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and NaOCl. After drying with paper points the root canals were randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 12), according to filling material: Resilon cones/Real Seal sealer or gutta-percha cones and Endofill, Sealapex, AH Plus or MTA Fillapex sealers. After one week, root canal fillings were removed using Eucaliptol and K-files. Root canals were re-instrumented with K-files and GG burs sized larger than the first ones. The removal of root canal filling material was analyzed by radiography and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed using Binary Logistic Regression test (P < 0.05). Results: Radiographic and SEM analysis showed that material from the MTA Fillapex group was better removed than that from Endofill, Sealapex, AH Plus and Real Seal groups. Conclusion: After re-instrumentation, MTA Fillapex group showed less remnants into the root canals than Endofill, Sealapex, AH Plus and Real Seal groups. Residual material was most often found in the apical third.Keywords Dental radiography; Endodontic retreatment; Root canal filling materials; Scanning electron microscopy.

Download Full-text