Concomitant boost chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: Treatment tolerance and acute side effects

Ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity are potentially irreversible side effects of chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) patients. Several predictive genetic variants have been described, but as yet none in LAHNC patients. The aim of this study is to investigate genetic variants as predictors for ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity in LAHNC patients treated with cisplatin-containing chemoradiotherapy. Our prospective cohort of 92 patients was genotyped for 10 genetic variants and evaluated for their association with cisplatin-induced ototoxicity (ACYP2, COMT, TPMT and WFS1) and nephrotoxicity (OCT2, MATE and XPD). Ototoxicity was determined by patient-reported complaints as well as tone audiometrical assessments. Nephrotoxicity was defined as a decrease of ≥25% in creatinine clearance during treatment compared to baseline. A significant association was observed between carriership of the A allele for rs1872328 in the ACYP2 gene and cisplatin-induced clinically determined ototoxicity (p = 0.019), and not for ototoxicity measured by tone audiometrical assessments (p = 0.449). Carriership of a T allele for rs316019 in the OCT2 gene was significantly associated with nephrotoxicity at any time during chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.022), but not with nephrotoxicity at the end of the chemoradiotherapy. In conclusion, we showed prospectively that in LAHNC patients genetic variants in ACYP2 are significantly associated with clinically determined ototoxicity. Validation studies are necessary to prove the added value for individualized treatments plans in these patients.

Download Full-text

A phase I/II trial of induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant docetaxel with concomitant boost radiotherapy (CBR) and amifostine for advanced head and neck cancer (HNC)

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.15525 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 15525-15525 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

C. Saurel ◽

R. Meredith ◽

J. A. Bonner ◽

G. Peters ◽

W. Carroll ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Head And Neck Cancer ◽

Side Effects ◽

Phase I ◽

Head And Neck ◽

Induction Chemotherapy ◽

Neck Cancer ◽

Distant Metastasis ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Primary Chemotherapy ◽

Advanced Head

15525 Background: Concomitant chemo-radiation for head and neck cancer has emerged as the optimal method of treating advanced head and neck cancers, although the acute and late toxicities can be formidable. The addition of induction chemotherapy to concomitant chemo-radiation for head and neck cancer is designed to impact the incidence of distant metastasis while delivering aggressive local treatment. This trial evaluates the tolerability and effectiveness of induction chemotherapy followed by CBR with concurrent docetaxel and subcutaneous (SC) amifostine in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Methods: Patients with stage III/IV nonmetastatic SCCHN received 3 cycles of primary chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin, each at 75 mg/m2. Patients then received 4 weekly doses of docetaxel at 20 mg/m2 with concurrent CBR. SC amifostine was given at a dose of 500 mg in divided doses during each day of XRT. Results: The phase I component defined the MTD of concurrent docetaxel as 20 mg/m2 for 4 cycles during CBR. 18 patients are evaluated for response. No patient developed progressive disease during primary chemotherapy. Grade 3–4 mucositis was common, but all patients completed the planned concomitant docetaxel. At 6 months after treatment, 7/18 patients still used a feeding tube, though most have had them subsequently removed. Amifostine given by SC was well tolerated; 7 patients developed transient hypotension not requiring any intervention, with grade1 dermatitis and nausea reported. 2 patients discontinued amifostine due to rash or persistent hypotension. Conclusions: Response to induction chemotherapy was greater then 75% by radiological assessment, with no patient developing distant metastasis thus far. Local control has been excellent but side effects from docetaxel and CBR have necessitated prolonged use of feeding tubes for up to 6 months. SC amifostine has been well tolerated without significant side effects. This aggressive therapy is effective treatment for locally advanced SCCHN. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text