Narrow ridge augmentation technique for improved immediate oral implant placement

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
S Elanchezhiyan ◽  
K Vennila
Keyword(s):  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Narrow Ridge ◽  
Oral Implant

scholarly journals Volumetric changes in edentulous alveolar ridge sites utilizing guided bone regeneration and a custom titanium ridge augmentation matrix (CTRAM): a case series study

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig E. Hofferber ◽  
J. Cameron Beck ◽  
Peter C. Liacouras ◽  
Jeffrey R. Wessel ◽  
Thu P. Getka
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Bone Allograft ◽  
Volumetric Analysis ◽  
Collagen Membrane ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Case Series Study ◽  
Freeze Dried ◽  
Clinical Measurements ◽  
Bone Gain

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the volumetric changes in partially edentulous alveolar ridges augmented with customized titanium ridge augmentation matrices (CTRAM), freeze-dried bone allograft, and a resorbable collagen membrane. Methods A pre-surgical cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was obtained for CTRAM design/fabrication and to evaluate pre-surgical ridge dimensions. Ridge augmentation surgery using CTRAM, freeze-dried bone allograft, and a resorbable collagen membrane was performed at each deficient site. Clinical measurements of the area of augmentation were made at the time of CTRAM placement and re-entry, and a 2nd CBCT scan 7 months after graft placement was used for volumetric analysis. Locations of each CTRAM in situ were also compared to their planned positions. Re-entry surgery and implant placement was performed 8 months after CTRAM placement. Results Nine subjects were treated with CTRAM and freeze-dried bone allograft. Four out of the nine patients enrolled (44.4%) experienced premature CTRAM exposure during healing, and in two of these cases, CTRAM were removed early. Early exposure did not result in total graft failure in any case. Mean volumetric bone gain was 85.5 ± 30.9% of planned augmentation volume (61.3 ± 33.6% in subjects with premature CTRAM exposure vs. 104.9% for subjects without premature exposure, p = 0.03). Mean horizontal augmentation (measured clinically) was 3.02 mm, and vertical augmentation 2.86 mm. Mean surgical positional deviation of CTRAM from the planned location was 1.09 mm. Conclusion The use of CTRAM in conjunction with bone graft and a collagen membrane resulted in vertical and horizontal bone gain suitable for implant placement.

scholarly journals Clinical, Radiographic, and Histomorphometric Evaluation of a Vertical Ridge Augmentation Procedure Using a Titanium-Reinforced Microporous Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Emrane: A Prospective Case Series with 1-Year Follow-Up

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (14) ◽  
pp. 3828
Author(s):  
Jung-Gu Ji ◽  
Jung-A Yu ◽  
Seong-Ho Choi ◽  
Dong-Woon Lee
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Staged Approach ◽  
Height Change ◽  
Prospective Case Series ◽  
Augmentation Procedure

Vertical ridge augmentation for long-term implant stability is difficult in severely resorbed areas. We examined the clinical, radiological, and histological outcomes of guided-bone regeneration using novel titanium-reinforced microporous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (MP-ePTFE) membranes. Eighteen patients who underwent implant placement using a staged approach were enrolled (period: 2018–2019). Vertical ridge augmentation was performed in areas with vertical bone defects ≥ 4 mm. Twenty-six implant fixtures were placed in 14 patients. At implant placement six fixtures had relatively low stability. On cone-beam computed tomography, the average vertical changes were 4.2 ± 1.9 (buccal), 5.9 ± 2.7 (central), and 4.4 ± 2.8 mm (lingual) at six months after vertical ridge augmentation. Histomorphometric analyses revealed that the average proportions of new bone, residual bone substitute material, and soft tissue were 34.91 ± 11.61%, 7.16 ± 2.74%, and 57.93 ± 11.09%, respectively. Stable marginal bone levels were observed at 1-year post-loading. The residual bone graft material area was significantly lower in the exposed group (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the vertical height change in the buccal side between immediately after the augmentation procedure and the implant placement reentry time (p = 0.371). However, all implants functioned well regardless of the exposure during the observation period. Thus, vertical ridge augmentation around implants using titanium-reinforced MP-ePTFE membranes can be successful.

Complications Associated With the Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein–2 in Ridge Augmentation: A Case Report

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 351-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Dragonas ◽  
Charles Palin ◽  
Saba Khan ◽  
Praveen K. Gajendrareddy ◽  
Whitney D. Weiner
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Bone Morphogenic Protein ◽  
Human Bone ◽  
Therapy Outcomes ◽  
Bone Maturation ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Implant Dentistry ◽  
Bone Morphogenic Protein 2 ◽  
Recombinant Human Bone

This case report aims to describe in detail a complication associated with resorption of regenerated bone following implant placement and ridge augmentation using recombinant human bone morphogenic protein–2 (rhBMP-2) in combination with allograft and xenograft. Bilateral maxillary sinus and ridge augmentation procedures were completed using rhBMP-2 combined with allograft and xenograft. Five months later, significant bone augmentation was achieved, which allowed for the placement of 4 implants. Upon stage 2 surgery, significant dehiscence was noted in all implants. Treatment steps to address this complication included implant removal, guided bone regeneration with xenograft only, and placement of new implants followed by soft-tissue grafting. At the time of publication, this patient is status 1½ years post case completion with maintenance of therapy outcomes. Off-label use of rhBMP-2 has gained significant acceptance in implant dentistry. However, there is limited evidence regarding the bone maturation process when rhBMP-2 is combined with other biomaterials. More research may be needed regarding the timing and process of bone healing in the presence of rhBMP-2, in an effort to avoid surgical complications.

scholarly journals ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION USING AUTOGENOUS CHIN GRAFT AND SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT. A CASE REPORT

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 501-507
Author(s):  
Deepika Gorantla ◽  
◽  
SVVS Musalaiah ◽  
Pavuluri Aravind Kumar ◽  
Narendra Babu M. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement

scholarly journals Stability of Tissue Augmented with Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral Particles Associated with Implant Placement in Anterior Maxilla

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
David Buntoro Kamadjaja ◽  
Ni Putu Mira Sumarta ◽  
Andra Rizqiawan
Keyword(s):  
Bovine Bone ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Simultaneous Approach ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Staged Approach ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Bovine Bone Mineral ◽  
Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral ◽  
Clinical Stability

Background. Implant placement in defective anterior maxilla poses a great challenge regarding functional and aesthetic outcomes. Therefore, it requires predictable alveolar ridge augmentation. Deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) particle has commonly been used for bone grafting. However, it is associated with low resorption rates which potentially compromise the outcome of horizontal augmentation in conjunction with implant placement. Aims. This study is aimed at evaluating the stability of tissue augmented with DBBM particle associated with implant placement in the anterior maxilla. Materials and Methods. The inclusive criteria consist of patients being treated with guided bone regeneration (GBR) incorporating the use of DBBM particles with either a simultaneous or staged approach. The parameters analyzed include the implant survival rate, post-GBR clinical stability based on tissue resorption level, and the tissue stability between simultaneous and staged approaches. Statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney test is performed with significance determined at p value < 0.05. Results. Seventeen patients with 23 implant placements satisfy the criteria for this study. Simultaneous approach is adopted in 18 (78.3%) implants and a staged approach in 5 (21.7%) implants. The implant survival rate is 100%. The evaluation of horizontal tissue stability reveals a low resorption level in 19 (82.6%) implants, while moderate and high resorption levels are found in 3 (13.0%) and 1 (4.3%) implants, respectively. The statistical analysis shows that the simultaneous approach produces significantly (p=0.005) lower resorption level compared to the staged approach. Conclusion. Horizontal ridge augmentation using DBBM particles associated with implant placement in the anterior maxilla produces good clinical stability. The stability appears to be higher in the simultaneous approach compared to the staged approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document