scholarly journals Evaluating Accuracy of Free-hand Pedicle Screw Insertion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Postoperative Multi-Slice Computed Tomography Scan

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammadhossein Jamalaldini ◽  
Mohammadreza Etemadifar
Spine ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Takahashi ◽  
Hiroki Hirabayashi ◽  
Hiroyuki Hashidate ◽  
Nobuhide Ogihara ◽  
Hiroyuki Kato

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 554-561
Author(s):  
Markus Rafael Konieczny ◽  
Johannes Boos ◽  
Andrea Steuwe ◽  
Christoph Schleich ◽  
Max Prost ◽  
...  

Purpose Reports on heterogenous groups of patients have indicated that pedicle screw insertion guided by navigation (PIN) leads to, for the patient, higher doses of radiation compared with pedicle screw insertion guided by fluoroscopy (PIF). This would be a major concern, especially in paediatric deformity correction. Methods After a power analysis (aiming at > 0.8) 293 pedicle screws which were inserted in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were analyzed by comparing effective dose and fluoroscopy time per screw for three different techniques. Groups 2 and 3 were matched to Group 1 by Lenke type of scoliosis. Group 1 were prospectively enrolled consecutive patients that have been operated on by PIN with image acquisition by preoperative CT scan (CTS). Group 2 were consecutive retrospectively matched patients who have been operated on by PIN with image acquisition by an intraoperative 3D scan (3DS). Group 3 were consecutive retrospectively matched patients who have been operated on by PIF. Results Mean dose of radiation per screw was 1.0 mSv (sd 0.8) per screw in CTS patients, 0.025 mSv (sd 0.001) per screw in 3DS patients and 0.781 mSv (sd 0.12) per screw in PIF patients. The difference was significant (p < 0.0001). Conclusion When we compared different techniques of navigation, navigation by image acquisition with CTS showed a significantly higher (by 97.5%) dose of radiation per screw for the patient than navigation by image acquisition by a 3DS. Navigation by 3DS showed significantly lower effective dose per screw for the adolescent patients than the fluoroscopic technique. Level of Evidence: II


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 998-1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Yin Wei Chan ◽  
Mun Keong Kwan

<p>To review existing publications on the safety of pedicle screw insertions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Despite having increased risk for neurological and visceral injuries, the use of pedicle screws have led to increased correction rates in scoliosis surgery. A review was performed on topics pertinent to pedicle screw insertion in AIS, which included pedicle morphometry in AIS, structures at risk during pedicle screw insertion, and accuracy and safety of various pedicle screw insertion techniques. The importance of computer navigation and future research regarding pedicle screw placement in AIS were also briefly reviewed. Many authors have reported abnormal pedicle anatomy in AIS. Injury to the neural structures was highest over the apical region, whereas aortic injury was the highest at T5 and T10. In the proximal thoracic spine, the esophagus could be injured even with screws as short as 25 mm. Overall pedicle perforation rates for perforations &gt;0 and &gt;2 mm (assessed by computed tomography) ranged from 6.4% to 65.0% and 3.7% to 29.9%, respectively. The critical pedicle perforation (&gt;2 mm excluding lateral thoracic) and anterior perforation (&gt;0 mm) rates was reported to range from 1.5% to 14.5% and 0.0% to 16.1%, respectively. Pedicle perforation rates were lower with the use of computer navigation. The incidence of neurological adverse events after scoliosis surgery was 0.06%–1.9%. Aortic injury has only been observed in case reports. According to the available literature, pedicle screw insertion in AIS is considered safe with low rates of clinical adverse events. Moreover, the use of navigation technology has been shown to reduce pedicle perforation rates.</p>


2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 138S
Author(s):  
Randal Betz ◽  
John Gaughan ◽  
Stewart Bailey ◽  
Linda D'Andrea ◽  
Amer Samdani ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. E248-E253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keitaro Matsukawa ◽  
Yoshiyuki Yato ◽  
Osamu Nemoto ◽  
Hideaki Imabayashi ◽  
Takashi Asazuma ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsung-Ting Tsai ◽  
Lih-Huei Chen ◽  
Po-Liang Lai ◽  
Tsai-Sheng Fu ◽  
Chi-Chien Niu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document