A comparative study between conventional and the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology of 240 cases

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Megha Ralli ◽  
Pinki Pandey ◽  
Alok Dixit ◽  
Anshul Sawhney ◽  
Vineet Chaturvedi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
The Bethesda System

scholarly journals TO STUDY THYROID CYTOLOGY BY CONVENTIONAL METHOD AND APPLYING BETHESDA SYSTEM TO SAME SMEARS.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishan Kumar Sharma ◽  
Ashik Mullik
Keyword(s):  
Benign Lesion ◽  
Follicular Neoplasm ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Prospective Group ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System

Method: The thyroid cytology smears reported at the Department of Pathology Index medical College over a two year period from May 2015 to June 2017 and a prospective thyroid FNAC smears from Sep 2017 to Aug 2019 were studied at the Department of Pathology Index Medical College. The conventional and Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology were followed for reporting. A comparison of old conventional reporting system and Bethesda system were then analyzed.      Result: In Bethesda System None of the patients in both the group showed Inadequate diagnosis which was seen in the retrospective group using conventional system. Bethesda System has revealed that out of 81 patients with Benign Lesion, 41 (50.6%) were in retrospective group and 40 (49.4%) were in prospective group. Malignant was present in 2 (40%) and 3 (60%) patients in Retrospective and prospective group. Similarly out of 4 patients with Follicular Neoplasm, 3 (75%) and 1 (25%) were in retrospective and prospective group. However the distribution was comparable between both the groups. Conclusion: Adapting the Bethesda system of reporting has led to a high to sensitivity, specificity and high negative predictive values. Use of Bethesda systems helps in the prognosis, management and minimizes the unnecessary surgical procedures of thyroid swelling. Keywords: Thyroid, Cytology, Bethesda & Smears.

Cytomorphologic, Imaging, Molecular Findings, and Outcome in Thyroid Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance/Atypical Cell of Undetermined Significance (AUS/FLUS): A Mini-Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bita Geramizadeh ◽  
Somayeh Bos-hagh ◽  
Zahra Maleki
Keyword(s):  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Atypical Cell ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
Ancillary Studies ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Objectives: Since the introduction of the entity of “Atypical cell of undetermined significance /follicular lesion of undetermined significance” (AUS/FLUS) by The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) in 2007, there have been many published studies about the cytomorphologic criteria, subclassification, outcome, and management of patients with the diagnosis of AUS/FLUS. There have been many studies in different aspects of this indeterminate category, i.e., cytologic and molecular findings, ultrasonographic findings, and in some instances even core-needle biopsy to address a better and safer way of the management of patients with this fine-needle aspiration cytology diagnosis. The second edition of TBSRTC and the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines provide an update on the follow-up and management of AUS/FLUS. A multidisciplinary team consisting of pathologists, endocrinologists, surgeons, and radiologists should be involved in the diagnosis and management of AUS/FLUS, and all of them should be aware of the heterogeneity of this lesion for the prediction of the treatment and outcome. Study Design: In this review, we consider different research platforms (2008–2017) to find the best and key reports for the above-mentioned challenging aspects of AUS/FLUS. Conclusion: AUS/FLUS is now a well-defined group of thyroid lesions, which can be most accurately diagnosed and managed with cytomorphology, molecular, and ancillary studies.

scholarly journals Performance of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology in Multi-Institutional Large Cohort of Pediatric Thyroid Nodules: A Detailed Analysis

Diagnostics ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 179
Author(s):  
Sule Canberk ◽  
Helena Barroca ◽  
Inês Girão ◽  
Ozlem Aydın ◽  
Aysun Uguz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Paediatric Population ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Histologic Diagnosis ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
The Bethesda System

Background: To evaluate the performance of TBSRTC through multi-institutional experience in the paediatric population and questioning the management recommendation of ATA Guidelines Task Force on Paediatric Thyroid Cancer; Methods: A retrospective search was conducted in 4 institutions to identify consecutive thyroid FNAC cases in paediatric population between 2000 and 2018. Following the 2nd TBSRTC, the risk of malignancy ratios (ROMs) was given in ranges and calculated by 2 different ways. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and DA ratios were calculated using histologic diagnosis as the gold standard; Results: Among a total of 405 specimens, the distribution of cases for each category was, 44 (11%) for ND, 204 (50%) for B category, 40 (10%) for AUS/FLUS, 36 (9%) for FN/SFN, 24 (6%) for SFM and 57 (14%) for M categories. 153 cases have a histological diagnosis. The ratio of surgery was 23% in ND, 16% in the B, 45% for AUS/FLUS, 75% for SFN/FN and 92% for SFM and 75% in M categories; Conclusions: The data underlines the high ROM values in paediatric population which might be clinically meaningful. The high rate of malignancy of the cohort of operated patients (50%) also underlines the need of better preoperative indicators for stratification. Considering that more than half of the nodules in AUS/FLUS category were benign, direct surgery recommendation could be questionable as proposed in ATA 2015 guidelines.

scholarly journals The Bethesda system for reporting of thyroid cytopathology and its category wise management

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 2228
Author(s):  
Varun Gupta ◽  
Pooja Singh
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Reporting System ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System

Background: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of thyroid is a rapid diagnostic test for thyroid nodules. The Bethesda system classifies thyroid FNAC into six categories. Each category is linked to a malignancy risk and has recommended clinical management. The aim of this study was to analyze the thyroid cytology smears by Bethesda system and to assess the frequency of various categories and to correlate it previous published studies. Category wise management is also discussed in detail.Methods: A total of 388 thyroid FNAC samples were examined from January 2017 to June 2018 in the Department of Pathology, in Medanta- The Medicity Gurugram.Results: A total of 388 cases were reported according to Bethesda system of reporting. Categories were as follows: I (14.69%), II (61.85%), III (11.34%), IV (2.57%), V (2.660%), VI (4.91%) nodules.Conclusions: The Bethesda System for reporting thyroid cytopathology proved to be an excellent reporting system and it puts clinician and the cytopathologist on the same page and easier to communicate regarding diagnosis.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytology with histopathological correlation

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 247
Author(s):  
Purushotham Reddy ◽  
Akina Prakash ◽  
Sujata S. Giriyan
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
Research Work ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Follicular Neoplasm ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Histopathological Correlation ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Management Approaches ◽  
The Bethesda System

Background: The Bethesda system of reporting thyroid cytopathology is a standardised system, improving communication between cytopathologists and clinicians, leading to more consistent management approaches. The aim of the research work was to study the utility of Bethesda system in reporting thyroid cytology with histopathological correlation of all the cases undergoing surgical resection.Methods: We studied all the thyroid cytology cases received between November 2012 to April 2014, and classified them according to the Bethesda system. Histopathological correlation was done for all the cases which underwent surgical resection with evaluation of cyto-histological discrepancies.Results: Out of 484 cases studied, 432(89.2%) were benign lesions, 20(4.1%) were malignant,18 (3.7%) were Unsatisfactory/Nondiagnostic, 10(2%) were Follicular neoplasm/Suspicious for neoplasm, 3 (0.6%) were suspicious for malignancy, and 1(0.002%) case was reported as Atypia of undetermined significance. Out of the 54 cases available for histopathological follow-up, cyto-histological discrepancies were noted in 5 cases (9.2%). Statistical analysis of the present study showed that cytological analysis of thyroid lesions by Bethesda system has got high sensitivity (72.72%), high specificity (95.3%) with a positive predictive value of 80% and negative predictive value of 93.1% and a high accuracy (90.7%).Conclusions: Reviewing the thyroid FNAs (fine needle aspirates) using Bethesda system allowed a more specific cytological diagnosis with better interlaboratory agreement. As evidenced by its high sensitivity and specificity, Bethesda system has proven to be a very effective guide for the clinical management of thyroid nodules.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of the Bethesda System of Reporting of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Thyroid with Histopathology

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (52) ◽  
pp. 3171-3175
Author(s):  
Kirthi Nath K.V ◽  
Geetha Sukumaran
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Follicular Neoplasm ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
The Bethesda System

BACKGROUND The Bethesda system of reporting thyroid cytopathology is an outstanding and systematic approach of reporting thyroid cytology samples, thereby reducing the communication gap between cytopathologist and clinician, leading to a better patient care approach. We aim to study the thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) using the Bethesda system and evaluate its accuracy taking histopathology as gold standard. METHODS This was a descriptive study including 200 consecutive cases which came to our cytology department between January 2014 and December 2014. All thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) were categorised as per the Bethesda system and followed up with corresponding histopathology. RESULTS Out of the 200 cases, adequacy criteria was met in 196 (98 %) cases. 176 (88 %) cases fell in the benign category, 4 (2 %) cases were inadequate samples, 8 (4 %) showed features of follicular neoplasm / suspicious of follicular neoplasm and 12 (6 %) were malignant lesions. Histopathology follow up was available for all cases. Statistical analysis showed a specificity of 100 % (high), sensitivity of 40 % (low). Positive predictive value was 100 %, negative predictive value was 90.4 %. Accuracy rate was 91 %. CONCLUSIONS Interpreting the thyroid FNAC results using Bethesda system allowed a superior interlaboratory agreement leading to improved clinical management. KEYWORDS Thyroid, Cytology, Bethesda

scholarly journals Evaluation of the positive predictive value of atypical thyroid cytology cases according to the Bethesda system taking histopathology as gold standard.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 2015-2020
Author(s):  
Shireen Hamid ◽  
Aman ur Rehman ◽  
Muhammad Kashif Baig ◽  
Uzma Aslam ◽  
Nausheen Heena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Thyroid Function Tests ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Objectives: For the past 20 years Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) has evolved as the most sensitive diagnostic tool for the initial screening of patients with thyroid nodules. Unfortunately FNAC is complicated by a recognized false negative rate of approximately 5%. The clinicians could face the difficulty in the management of patient when a cytological diagnosis is atypical only. The objective of study is to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of atypical thyroid cytology cases according to the Bethesda system taking histopathology as gold standard. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Setting: Department of Pathology at Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. Period: Six months i.e. from 25.11.2014 to 25.5.2015. Materials and Methods: Patients presenting with solitary thyroid nodules in the outpatient department and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included after evaluation by thyroid function tests and thyroid scan, FNAC was performed and reported according to Bethesda system of thyroid reporting. Later on, cases underwent lobectomy, total or hemi-thyroidectomy, the tissue was received in 10% formalin solution in our pathology department and then processed, stained and examined. FNAC results of atypical cases were then compared with the definitive histological diagnosis which were considered the gold standard. The slides were examined and any differences were sought by consensus of two pathologists. Eighty cases were observed with 95% confidence level, 11% margin of error, using non-probability purposive sampling technique for sample collection. Data was analyzed by SPSS version 15 (P value <0.05). Results: The mean age of patients was 38 years with SD ± 2.16. There were 22 (28%) males and 58 (72%) females in our study. In this study, positive predictive value for Atypia of undetermined significance/ Follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS), follicular neoplasm (FN), suspicious for malignancy and positive for malignancy were 33.3%, 25%, 66.6% and 100% respectively. Overall PPV of atypical cytology was 35.71%. Overall accuracy of FNAC was 86.30%, 87.50% sensitivity and 86.15% specificity, PPV value 43.75% and negative predictive value was 98.25%. Conclusion: Results showed that Bethesda system of reporting is helpful for the management of patients who falls in to undetermined categories as it categorically divide atypical cytology cases in to three definite categories  AUS, FN and suspicious for malignancy and these categories have different risks of malignancy. Thus can help to determine a better patient outcome due to proper clinical management of thyroid swellings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document