scholarly journals Determination of methadone and eight new psychoactive substances in hair samples by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Anzillotti ◽  
Luca Calò ◽  
Marianna Giacalone ◽  
Antonio Banchini ◽  
Rossana Cecchi
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (18) ◽  
pp. 2732-2743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalid A. Alsenedi ◽  
Calum Morrison

Insight into mass spectrometry ions and derivatization conditions for synthetic cathinone type new psychoactive substances.


Molecules ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (13) ◽  
pp. 2501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam Hee Kwon ◽  
Yu Rim Lee ◽  
Hee Seung Kim ◽  
Jae Chul Cheong ◽  
Jin Young Kim

Sample preparation is an important step in the isolation of target compounds from complex matrices to perform their reliable and accurate analysis. Hair samples are commonly pulverized or processed as fine cut, depending on preference, before extraction by techniques such as solid-phase extraction (SPE), liquid–liquid extraction, and other methods. In this study, a method based on hybrid solid-phase extraction (hybridSPE) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) was developed and validated for the determination of methamphetamine (MA) and amphetamine (AP) in hair. The hair samples were mechanically pulverized after washing with de-ionized water and acetone. The samples were then sonicated in methanol at 50 °C for 1 h and centrifuged at 50,000× g for 3 min. The supernatants were transferred onto the hybridSPE cartridge and extracted using 1 mL of 0.05 M methanolic hydrogen chloride. The combined solutions were evaporated to dryness, derivatized using pentafluoropropionic anhydride, and analyzed by GC–MS. Excellent linearity (R2 > 0.9998) was achieved in the ranges of 0.05–5.0 ng/mg for AP and 0.1–10.0 ng/mg for MA. The recovery was 83.4–96.8%. The intra- and inter-day accuracies were −9.4% to 5.5% and −5.1% to 3.1%, while the intra- and inter-day precisions were within 8.3% and 6.7%, respectively. The limits of detections were 0.016 ng/mg for AP and 0.031 ng/mg for MA. The validated hybridSPE method was applied to dyed hair for MA and AP extraction and compared to a methanol extraction method currently being used in our laboratory. The results showed that an additional hybridSPE step improved the recovery by 5.7% for low-concentration quality control (QC) samples and by 24.1% for high-concentration QC samples. Additionally, the hybridSPE method was compared to polymeric reversed-phase SPE methods, and the absolute recoveries for hybridSPE were 50% and 20% greater for AP (1.5 ng/mg) and MA (3.0 ng/mg), respectively. In short, the hybridSPE technique was shown to minimize the matrix effects, improving GC–MS analysis of hair. Based on the results, the proposed method proved to be effective for the selective determination of MA and AP in hair samples.


Author(s):  
Pham Quoc Chinh ◽  
Pham Thi Thu Ha ◽  
Nguyen Mai Dung ◽  
Vu Huu Phuoc ◽  
Vu Duc Loi ◽  
...  

This article develops a combined solid phase extraction (SPE) and gas chromatography – mass spectrometry (GC-MS) procedure for determining amphetamine-type stimulants Amphetamine (AM) and Methamphetamine (MA) in human hair. Hair samples were incubated in methanol containing 1% hydrochloric acid in 18 hours and then subjected to SPE. The obtained extracts were evaporated to dryness, derivatized with heptafluorobutyric anhydride (HFBA) at 70 °C for 30 minutes prior to GC–MS analysis. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry was run on HP5-MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm) with detector MS 5975C. Experimentally, the proposed method proved sensitive, simple and time-saving, but quite accurate with a low limit of detection (LOD = 0.05ng/mg) and quantitation (LOQ = 0.15ng/mg). Keywords: SPE, GC – MS, hair samples, amphetamine, methamphetamine. References [1] Ming-Ren Fuh, Ti-Yu Wu and Tzuen-Yeuan Lin, Determination of amphetamine and methamphetamine in urine by solid phase extraction and ion-pair liquid chromatography–electrospray–tandem mass spectrometry Talanta, 68 (3) (2006), 987-991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2005.06.057[2] Naresh C. Jain, Thomas C. Sneath, and Robert D. Budd, Rapid Gas-Chomatographic Determination of Amphetamine and Methamphetamine in urine, Clinical Chemistry, 20 (11) (1974) 1460-1462. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/20.11.1460.[3] Dong-liang Lin, Rea-Ming Yin, Ray H. Liu, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analysis of Amphetamine, Methamphetamine, 3,4-Methylenedioxy- amphetamine and 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine in Human Hair and Hair Sections, Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 13(2) (2005) 193-200. https://doi.org/10.38212/2224-6614.2526[4] María Jesús Tabernero, Maria Linda Felli, Ana María Bermejo, Marcello Chiarotti, Determination of ketamine and amphetamines in hair by LC/MS/MS, Anal Bioanal Chem, 395(2009), 2547–2557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3163-4.[5] D.V. Doan, D.Q. Huy, N.D. Hue, T.M. Tri, Determination of methamphetamine in urine samples by gas chromatography mass spectrometry combined with solid phase extraction technique, Journal of Science and Technology 47 (6) (2009) 53-58 (in Vietnamese).[6] Rodger L. Foltz, Allison F. Fentiman, Ruth B. Foltz, GC/MS Assays for Abused Drugs in Body Fluids, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Maryland, 1980.[7] AOAC, Appendix F: Guidelines for Standard Method Performance Requirements, AOAC official methods of analysis, Maryland, 2016.[8] Eunyoung Han, Martin P. Paulus, Marc Wittmann, Heesun Chung, Joon myong Song, Hair analysis and self-report of methamphetamine use by methamphetamine dependent individuals, Journal of Chromatography B, 879 (2011) 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.01.002.      


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document