Twice Abused: Same-Sex Domestic Violence and the Law

Author(s):  
Evan Fray-Witzer
Keyword(s):  
Same Sex ◽  
2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel B. Verni ◽  
Karina Rinsky
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian P. Tesch ◽  
Debra Bekerian ◽  
Peter English ◽  
Evan Harrington
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Zorica Saltirovska Professor ◽  
Sunchica Dimitrijoska Professor

Gender-based violence is a form of discrimination that prevents women from enjoying the rights and liberties on an equal level with men. Inevitably, domestic violence shows the same trend of victimizing women to such a degree that the term “domestic violence” is increasingly becoming synonymous with “violence against women”. The Istanbul Convention defines domestic violence as "gender-based violence against women", or in other words "violence that is directed against a woman because she is a woman or that affects women disproportionately." The situation is similar in the Republic of Macedonia, where women are predominantly victims of domestic violence. However, the Macedonian legal framework does not define domestic violence as gender-based violence, and thus it does not define it as a specific form of discrimination against women. The national legislation stipulates that victims are to be protected in both a criminal and a civil procedure, and the Law on Prevention and Protection from Domestic Violence determines the actions of the institutions and civil organizations in the prevention of domestic violence and the protection of victims. The system for protection of victims of domestic violence closely supports the Law on Social Protection and the Law on Free Legal Aid, both of which include provisions on additional assistance for women victims of domestic violence. However, the existing legislation has multiple deficiencies and does not allow for a greater efficacy in implementing the prescribed measures for the protection of victims of domestic violence. For this reason, as well as due to the inconsistent implementation of legal solutions of this particular issue, the civil sector is constantly expressing their concern about the increasingly wider spread of domestic violence against women and about the protection capabilities at their disposal. The lack of recognition of all forms of gender-based violence, the trivial number of criminal sentences against persons who perform acts of domestic violence, the insufficient support offered to victims – including victim shelters, legal assistance, and counseling, and the lack of systematic databases on domestic violence cases on a national level, are a mere few of the many issues clearly pointing to the inevitable conclusion that the protection of women-victims of domestic violence is inadequate. Hence, the functionality and efficiency of both the existing legislation and the institutions in charge of protection and support of women – victims of domestic violence is being questioned, which is also the subject for analysis in this paper.


Since its Broadway debut, Hamilton: An American Musical has infused itself into the American experience: who shapes it, who owns it, who can rap it best. Lawyers and legal scholars, recognizing the way the musical speaks to some of our most complicated constitutional issues, have embraced Alexander Hamilton as the trendiest historical face in American civics. This book offers a revealing look into the legal community's response to the musical, which continues to resonate in a country still deeply divided about the reach of the law. Intellectual property scholars share their thoughts on Hamilton's inventive use of other sources, while family law scholars explore domestic violence. Critical race experts consider how Hamilton furthers our understanding of law and race, while authorities on the Second Amendment discuss the language of the Constitution's most contested passage. Legal scholars moonlighting as musicians discuss how the musical lifts history and law out of dusty archives and onto the public stage. This collection of minds, inspired by the phenomenon of the musical and the Constitutional Convention of 1787, urges us to heed Lin-Manuel Miranda and the Founding Fathers and to create something new, daring, and different.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-192
Author(s):  
Ana Indah Cahyani ◽  
Yulia Monita ◽  
Elizabeth Siregar

ABSTRAK Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan memahami pengaturan sanksi pidana dalam kasus kekerasan dalam rumah tangga menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga berikut dan  implementasi pidana denda sebagai alternatif pemidanaan pada tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis empiris, penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pidana denda sebagai alternatif pemidanaan pada tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga belum terlaksana. Pidana denda sebagai alternatif pidana penjara pada tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga perlu dikembangkan. Karena pidana denda mampu memberikan efek jera dan selaras dengan tujuan penghapusan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Selain itu, pidana denda lebih mengutamakan keutuhan rumah tangga yang harmonis dan sejahtera guna mengurangi kemungkinan perceraian. Maka dari itu pada kasus kekerasan dalam rumah tangga yang tidak terlalu berat perlu diterapkan pidana denda sebagai alternatif dari pidana penjara agar terciptanya keadilan, kepastian, dan kemanfaatan terutama bagi masyarakat, korban dan terpidana itu sendiri. ABSTRACT The objectives to be achieved in this study are: 1) to know and understand the regulation of criminal sanction in cases of domestic violence according to the Law Number 23 Year 2004 Elimination of Domestic Violence. 2) to find out the implementation of criminal fine as an alternative punishment in the crime of domestic violence. Using the empirical juridical method, the study has found that criminal fines as an alternative to criminal acts in domestic violence have not been implemented. Criminal fines as an alternative to imprisonment in domestic violence should be developed because it is able to provide a detterent effect and are aligned with the aim of eliminating domestic violence. Criminal fines prioritize the integrity of a harmonious and prosperous household in order to reduce the possibility of diorce. Therefore in cases of domestic violence that are not too severe it is necessary to apply criminal fines as an alternative to imprisonment in order to create justice, certainty and benefits especially for the community, victims and convicts themselves.


2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 174-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie McCarry ◽  
Marianne Hester ◽  
Catherine Donovan

The article discusses the issues and problems that need to be addressed in the development of a comprehensive survey approach to explore same sex domestic violence in relationships involving individuals identifying as lesbian, gay male, bisexual, transgender or queer (LGBT&Q). It draws on the most detailed study to date in the UK comparing love and domestic violence in same-sex and heterosexual relationships. The survey methodology built on previous research, attempting in particular to overcome the limitations of earlier studies; and to produce data that could be compared with existing data on domestic violence in both heterosexual and LGBT&Q communities. The result was a questionnaire that reflected a wide range of abusive behaviours; examined impact of the violence alongside a quantification of particular acts; took into account experience of violence from a partner, as well as use of violence against that partner; and incorporated issues related to equality/inequality and dependency. The questionnaire was successfully distributed across the UK to provide a national ‘same sex community’ survey of problems in relationships and domestic violence.


2009 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 1-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Puja Kapai

AbstractHong Kong recently amended its Domestic Violence Ordinance (“DVO”). During the deliberations, the issue of whether protection under the DVO ought to be extended to same-sex couples arose for discussion and has since been the subject of extensive debate. Religious and conservative groups have argued that including these groups within the DVO risks overhauling the traditional meaning of “family” and could implicitly legitimize same-sex marriage whilst others have insisted that failing to provide equivalent civil remedies under the DVO to such groups amounts to sexual orientation discrimination and is contrary to Hong Kong's international human rights commitments. This paper reviews the various arguments that have been raised against the inclusion of same-sex couples within the DVO and argues that Hong Kong's international and constitutional commitments to the principles of equality and non-discrimination require that samesex couples be brought within the purview of this legislation.


Author(s):  
Stephen Macedo

This chapter considers the main arguments raised by conservatives against same-sex marriage and gay rights more generally. Defenders of same-sex marriage acknowledge the fact that marriage is in many ways a conservative institution. Libertarians, liberationists, and some liberals doubt that marriage is fair given the diversity of people's conceptions of meaning and value in life. Many adopt an unnecessarily critical posture toward civil marriage. This chapter offers a sympathetic account of marriage that recognizes the importance for many people of marital commitment while also honoring, and indeed helping to secure, the equal liberty and fairness prized by liberals. It shows that the debate over gay rights has been shaped by the repeated articulation of a demand for public reasons and evidence to justify the shape of the law touching on gay rights and marriage. The demand for reasons was laid down by the dissenters in Bowers v. Hardwick (1987).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document