Public Choice ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugenia Froedge Toma

2020 ◽  
pp. 129-154
Author(s):  
Michael Sy Uy

This chapter examines the Ford Foundation’s predominantly economics- and finance-based expertise, and the way it sustained the country’s largest and most expensive performing arts institutions: orchestras, operas, and conservatories. Ford accomplished its goals primarily through matching grants and endowments, hoping with matching requirements to diversify organizations’ funding sources and expand the public’s commitment to local arts. Based on the expert advice of economists and administrators, Ford intended endowments to be a permanent source of income for orchestras and conservatories, if they managed the invested principal properly. In practice, however, wealthy individuals on boards of trustees for institutions such as the Boston Symphony Orchestra and the Juilliard School solidified their personal, social connections to elicit five-, six-, and sometimes seven-figure gifts. In general, ordinary citizens and the local community did not participate, and as a result, broad-based support never materialized. Orchestras and conservatories came back knocking on the foundation’s door again and again.


Author(s):  
Carol Lubomudrov

As a principal, I know that it is never easy to bring together a diverse group of people of different ages, backgrounds, and philosophies to make decisions, even about the most mundane issues. When parents, teachers, and administrators join together to make decisions about the education of their children, it takes commitment, patience, flexibility, perseverance, and a basic belief in the strength of collaborative decision making for the learning community to function smoothly. This basic belief in the strength of collaborative decision making forms the essence of the OC as a learning community. Before becoming principal of Washington Elementary School, which houses both the OC program and the traditional school for neighborhood children, I had taught for 13 years and been an administrator for 8 years in a variety of settings. I viewed myself as a believer in and practitioner of collaborative decision making. I had a fair amount of experience working with diverse groups, including students, parents, and boards of trustees. Never, however, had I encountered a group of parents and teachers who had a stronger sense of “community” or deeper implicit beliefs as to how their program should function. This may sound as if decision making in the OC was rigid—which was not the case. It was only that over the program’s 13 years, many of its beliefs and processes had become so intuitive that as a newcomer I sometimes had a difficult time understanding how decisions were made and who the ultimate authority was. I was principal of the OC for four years and never discovered “the ultimate authority.” During that time, I did discover that common understandings regarding the importance and value of dialogue, communication, and participation served as threads that formed the fabric of the program. Here I discuss some issues that arose regarding decision making and how they were handled by the community. Notice that I did not say “how they were resolved,” since one of the things I learned while working with the OC is that often simply processing or dialoguing about the particular issues brought about closure.


Author(s):  
Goldie Blumenstyk

How are colleges run? Is their unusual practice of “shared governance” in danger? Public and private colleges are run by the governing boards that have fiduciary responsibility for them—be they the self-perpetuating boards of trustees that run private colleges, the politically appointed (and in some...


1992 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Middleton

In this article, Sue Middleton draws on interview data from the initial phase of"Monitoring Today's Schools," a research project to monitor the impact of New Zealand's educational restructuring. Unlike restructuring movements in other countries,the New Zealand movement specifically included goals of social equity and cultural inclusiveness, and Middleton focuses on the reactions of parents, teachers,and administrators to the restructuring efforts surrounding these issues. After presenting a brief historical overview of the development of and debate over equity and cultural inclusiveness in New Zealand education, Middleton presents excerpts from interviews with members of three different schools' boards of trustees, which were created as part of the restructuring effort to move more authority to the local school level. She includes their reactions to the impact of social equity and cultural inclusiveness policies on their schools and their children, and concludes by describing recent developments in New Zealand education regarding these issues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document