Performance Evaluation of Emergency Risk Management under Group Decision Making An Approach of Incorporating Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 845-854
Author(s):  
Zongcai Jiang ◽  
Liying Yu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Risk Management ◽  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Fuzzy Topsis ◽  
Emergency Risk Management

scholarly journals Refractured Well Selection for Multicriteria Group Decision Making by Integrating Fuzzy AHP with Fuzzy TOPSIS Based on Interval-Typed Fuzzy Numbers

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiejun Li ◽  
Jianhua Jin ◽  
Chunquan Li
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Numbers ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Fuzzy Topsis ◽  
Selection Problem ◽  
Triangular Fuzzy Numbers ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Multicriteria Group Decision Making

Multicriteria group decision making (MCGDM) research has rapidly been developed and become a hot topic for solving complex decision problems. Because of incomplete or non-obtainable information, the refractured well-selection problem often exists in complex and vague conditions that the relative importance of the criteria and the impacts of the alternatives on these criteria are difficult to determine precisely. This paper presents a new model for MCGDM by integrating fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with fuzzy TOPSIS based on interval-typed fuzzy numbers, to help group decision makers for well-selection during refracturing treatment. The fuzzy AHP is used to analyze the structure of the selection problem and to determine weights of the criteria with triangular fuzzy numbers, and fuzzy TOPSIS with interval-typed triangular fuzzy numbers is proposed to determine final ranking for all the alternatives. Furthermore, the algorithm allows finding the best alternatives. The feasibility of the proposed methodology is also demonstrated by the application of refractured well-selection problem and the method will provide a more effective decision-making tool for MCGDM problems.

scholarly journals AN INTEGRATED FUZZY MULTI CRITERIA GROUP DECISION MAKING MODEL FOR HANDLING EQUIPMENT SELECTION

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 660-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdolreza Yazdani-Chamzini
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Fuzzy Topsis ◽  
Equipment Selection ◽  
Order Preference ◽  
Criteria Weights

The problem of handling equipment selection plays a significant role in the total cost of a mining project; so that it can affect the activity and continuity of the project and is a strategic problem. In this study, an integrated model based on two fuzzy multi-criteria decision making techniques for handling equipment selection is proposed. The proposed evaluation model is derived from group decision making, fuzzy set theory, analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and Technique to Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods. The fuzzy AHP (FAHP) method is utilized to calculate the relative importance of the evaluation criteria, then, fuzzy TOPSIS (FTOPSIS) is applied for evaluating the feasible handling equipment in order to select the best handling system among a pool of the possible alternatives. The model is applied for a real world case study to demonstrate the capability and effectiveness of the proposed model. To investigate the result sensitiveness to the changes of the criteria weights, a sensitivity analysis is finally conducted.

An interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy best-worst method

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Ashraf Norouzi ◽  
Hossein Razavi hajiagha
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Sets ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Uncertain Data ◽  
Interval Type ◽  
Best Worst Method

Multi criteria decision-making problems are usually encounter implicit, vague and uncertain data. Interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FS) are widely used to develop various MCDM techniques especially for cases with uncertain linguistic approximation. However, there are few researches that extend IT2FS-based MCDM techniques into qualitative and group decision-making environment. The present study aims to adopt a combination of hesitant and interval type-2 fuzzy sets to develop an extension of Best-Worst method (BWM). The proposed approach provides a flexible and convenient way to depict the experts’ hesitant opinions especially in group decision-making context through a straightforward procedure. The proposed approach is called IT2HF-BWM. Some numerical case studies from literature have been used to provide illustrations about the feasibility and effectiveness of our proposed approach. Besides, a comparative analysis with an interval type-2 fuzzy AHP is carried out to evaluate the results of our proposed approach. In each case, the consistency ratio was calculated to determine the reliability of results. The findings imply that the proposed approach not only provides acceptable results but also outperforms the traditional BWM and its type-1 fuzzy extension.

Schemes Selection of Yarn Tension Detection and Control Based on Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making

2013 ◽  
Vol 694-697 ◽  
pp. 2829-2834
Author(s):  
Yan Li ◽  
Hui Min Li ◽  
Yi Li
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Fuzzy Topsis ◽  
Yarn Tension ◽  
Attribute Weights ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Topsis Technique ◽  
And Control

To evaluate the yarn tension detection and control schemes in rapier looms, a fuzzy multiple-attribute group decision making problem is proposed for the schemes selection. Firstly, important degrees of every attributes from each expert are considered. The individual opinions of each expert are integrated with the similarity of the decision group. And the synthesized weights of each expert are calculated. Secondly, with the aggregation of experts opinions, the group attribute-weights matrixes are obtained. Then the fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution) is used to sequence the alternatives, and the optimal scheme is decided for yarn tension detection and control system, the decision results illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the developed method.

A Fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS-Based Group Decision-Making Approach to IT Personnel Selection

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1576-1591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Funda Samanlioglu ◽  
Yunus Emre Taskaya ◽  
Utku Can Gulen ◽  
Ogulcan Cokcan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Personnel Selection ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
It Personnel

scholarly journals Group decision-making approach for flood vulnerability identification using the fuzzy VIKOR method

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 863-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Lee ◽  
K. S. Jun ◽  
E.-S. Chung
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Fuzzy Topsis ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Consensus Building ◽  
Vikor Method ◽  
Flood Vulnerability ◽  
Fuzzy Vikor ◽  
Risk Vulnerability

Abstract. This study proposes an improved group decision making (GDM) framework that combines the VIKOR method with data fuzzification to quantify the spatial flood vulnerability including multiple criteria. In general, GDM method is an effective tool for formulating a compromise solution that involves various decision makers since various stakeholders may have different perspectives on their flood risk/vulnerability management responses. The GDM approach is designed to achieve consensus building that reflects the viewpoints of each participant. The fuzzy VIKOR method was developed to solve multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problems with conflicting and noncommensurable criteria. This comprising method can be used to obtain a nearly ideal solution according to all established criteria. This approach effectively can propose some compromising decisions by combining the GDM method and fuzzy VIKOR method. The spatial flood vulnerability of the southern Han River using the GDM approach combined with the fuzzy VIKOR method was compared with the spatial flood vulnerability using general MCDM methods, such as the fuzzy TOPSIS and classical GDM methods (i.e., Borda, Condorcet, and Copeland). As a result, the proposed fuzzy GDM approach can reduce the uncertainty in the data confidence and weight derivation techniques. Thus, the combination of the GDM approach with the fuzzy VIKOR method can provide robust prioritization because it actively reflects the opinions of various groups and considers uncertainty in the input data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document