Sums of Powers of Positive Integers

Author(s):  
Janet Beery
2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-110
Author(s):  
José Luis Cereceda

In this paper, we obtain a new formula for the sums of k-th powers of the first n positive integers, Sk(n), that involves the hyperharmonic numbers and the Stirling numbers of the second kind. Then, using an explicit representation for the hyperharmonic numbers, we generalize this formula to the sums of powers of an arbitrary arithmetic progression. Furthermore, we express the Bernoulli polynomials in terms of hyperharmonic polynomials and Stirling numbers of the second kind. Finally, we extend the obtained formula for Sk(n) to negative values of n.


2020 ◽  
Vol 108 (122) ◽  
pp. 103-120
Author(s):  
Neslihan Kilar ◽  
Yilmaz Simsek

The formula for the sums of powers of positive integers, given by Faulhaber in 1631, is proven by using trigonometric identities and some properties of the Bernoulli polynomials. Using trigonometric functions identities and generating functions for some well-known special numbers and polynomials, many novel formulas and relations including alternating sums of powers of positive integers, the Bernoulli polynomials and numbers, the Euler polynomials and numbers, the Fubini numbers, the Stirling numbers, the tangent numbers are also given. Moreover, by applying the Riemann integral and p-adic integrals involving the fermionic p-adic integral and the Volkenborn integral, some new identities and combinatorial sums related to the aforementioned numbers and polynomials are derived. Furthermore, we serve up some revealing and historical remarks and observations on the results of this paper.


2013 ◽  
Vol 132 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Schinzel

2016 ◽  
Vol 100 (548) ◽  
pp. 233-238
Author(s):  
José Luis Cereceda

The sums of powers of the first n positive integers Sp(n) = 1p + 2p + …+np, (p = 0, 1, 2, … )satisfy the fundamental identity(1)from which we can successively compute S0 (n), S1 (n), S2 (n), etc. Identity (1) can easily be proved by using the binomial theorem; see e.g. [1, 2]. Several variations of (1) are also well known [3, 4, 5].In this note, we derive the following lesser-known recursive formula for Sp (n):(2)where denote the (unsigned) Stirling numbers of the first kind, also known as the Stirling cycle numbers (see e.g. [6, Chapter 6]). Table 1 shows the first few rows of the Stirling number triangle. Although the recursive formula (2) is by no means new, our purpose in dealing with recurrence (2) in this note is two-fold. On one hand, we aim to provide a new algebraic proof of (2) by making use of two related identities involving the harmonic numbers.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Miomir Andjić ◽  
Romeo Meštrović

Let R=(R,+,·) be a commutative ring of characteristic m>0 (m may be equal to +∞) with unity e and zero 0. Given a positive integer n<m and the so-called n-symmetric set A=a1,a2,…,a2l-1,a2l such that al+i=ne-ai for each i=1,…,l, define the rth power sum Sr(A) as Sr(A)=∑i=12lair, for r=0,1,2,…. We prove that for each positive integer k there holds ∑i=02k-1(-1)i2k-1i22k-1-iniS2k-1-i(A)=0. As an application, we obtain two new Pascal-like identities for the sums of powers of the first n-1 positive integers.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Barner

Perceptual representations – e.g., of objects or approximate magnitudes –are often invoked as building blocks that children combine with linguisticsymbols when they acquire the positive integers. Systems of numericalperception are either assumed to contain the logical foundations ofarithmetic innately, or to supply the basis for their induction. Here Ipropose an alternative to this general framework, and argue that theintegers are not learned from perceptual systems, but instead arise toexplain perception as part of language acquisition. Drawing oncross-linguistic data and developmental data, I show that small numbers(1-4) and large numbers (~5+) arise both historically and in individualchildren via entirely distinct mechanisms, constituting independentlearning problems, neither of which begins with perceptual building blocks.Specifically, I propose that children begin by learning small numbers(i.e., *one, two, three*) using the same logical resources that supportother linguistic markers of number (e.g., singular, plural). Several yearslater, children discover the logic of counting by inferring the logicalrelations between larger number words from their roles in blind countingprocedures, and only incidentally associate number words with perception ofapproximate magnitudes, in an *ad hoc* and highly malleable fashion.Counting provides a form of explanation for perception but is not causallyderived from perceptual systems.


10.37236/1729 ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Denham

Let $a_1,\ldots,a_n$ be distinct, positive integers with $(a_1,\ldots,a_n)=1$, and let k be an arbitrary field. Let $H(a_1,\ldots,a_n;z)$ denote the Hilbert series of the graded algebra k$[t^{a_1},t^{a_2},\ldots,t^{a_n}]$. We show that, when $n=3$, this rational function has a simple expression in terms of $a_1,a_2,a_3$; in particular, the numerator has at most six terms. By way of contrast, it is known that no such expression exists for any $n\geq4$.


10.37236/1735 ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhruv Mubayi ◽  
Yi Zhao

Given positive integers $n,k,t$, with $2 \le k\le n$, and $t < 2^k$, let $m(n,k,t)$ be the minimum size of a family ${\cal F}$ of nonempty subsets of $[n]$ such that every $k$-set in $[n]$ contains at least $t$ sets from ${\cal F}$, and every $(k-1)$-set in $[n]$ contains at most $t-1$ sets from ${\cal F}$. Sloan et al. determined $m(n, 3, 2)$ and Füredi et al. studied $m(n, 4, t)$ for $t=2, 3$. We consider $m(n, 3, t)$ and $m(n, 4, t)$ for all the remaining values of $t$ and obtain their exact values except for $k=4$ and $t= 6, 7, 11, 12$. For example, we prove that $ m(n, 4, 5) = {n \choose 2}-17$ for $n\ge 160$. The values of $m(n, 4, t)$ for $t=7,11,12$ are determined in terms of well-known (and open) Turán problems for graphs and hypergraphs. We also obtain bounds of $m(n, 4, 6)$ that differ by absolute constants.


2020 ◽  
pp. 77-83
Author(s):  
Mohammad Shadab Khan ◽  
Mohd Arif Raza ◽  
Nadeemur Rehman

Let R be a prime ring, I a nonzero ideal of R, d a derivation of R and m, n fixed positive integers. (i) If (d ( r ○ s)(r ○ s) + ( r ○ s) d ( r ○ s)n - d ( r ○ s))m for all r, s ϵ I, then R is commutative. (ii) If (d ( r ○ s)( r ○ s) + ( r ○ s) d ( r ○ s)n - d (r ○ s))m ϵ Z(R) for all r, s ϵ I, then R satisfies s4, the standard identity in four variables. Moreover, we also examine the case when R is a semiprime ring.


2017 ◽  
Vol 177 ◽  
pp. 37-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor J.W. Guo ◽  
Qiang-Qiang Jiang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document