scholarly journals 11C-Choline PET-CT Detection of Osseous Metastases versus Bone Scan in Newly Diagnosed High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients-A Pilot Study

2013 ◽  
Vol s6 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasarachi E Onyeuku
2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
Y. Benameur ◽  
O. Ait Sahel ◽  
S. Nabih Oueriagli ◽  
J. El Bekkali ◽  
A. Doudouh

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hansjörg Vees ◽  
Charles Steiner ◽  
Giovanna Dipasquale ◽  
Amine Chouiter ◽  
Thomas Zilli ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wojciech A. Cieślikowski ◽  
Joanna Budna-Tukan ◽  
Monika Świerczewska ◽  
Agnieszka Ida ◽  
Michał Hrab ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the enumeration of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in blood can differentiate between true localized and metastatic prostate cancer. A cross-sectional study of 104 prostate cancer patients with newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer was conducted. In total, 19 patients presented metastatic disease and 85 were diagnosed with localized disease. Analyses included intergroup comparison of CTC counts, determined using the CellSearch® system, EPISPOT assay and GILUPI CellCollector®, and ROC analysis verifying the accuracy of CTC count as a maker of disseminated prostate cancer. The vast majority (94.7%) of patients with advanced-stage cancer tested positively for CTCs in at least one of the assays. However, significantly higher CTC counts were determined with the CellSearch® system compared to EPISPOT assay and GILUPI CellCollector®. Identification of ≥4 CTCs with the CellSearch® system was the most accurate predictor of metastatic disease (sensitivity 0.500; specificity 0.900; AUC (95% CI) 0.760 (0.613–0.908). Furthermore, we tried to create a model to enhance the specificity and sensitivity of metastatic prediction with CTC counts by incorporating patient’s clinical data, including PSA serum levels, Gleason score and clinical stage. The composite biomarker panel achieved the following performance: sensitivity, 0.611; specificity, 0.971; AUC (95% CI), 0.901 (0.810–0.993). Thus, although the sensitivity of CTC detection needs to be further increased, our findings suggest that high CTC counts might contribute to the identification of high-risk prostate cancer patients with occult metastases at the time of diagnosis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 89 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Martorana ◽  
R. Schiavina ◽  
E. Brunocilla ◽  
S. Concetti ◽  
A. Bertaccini ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 61-61
Author(s):  
Ivan Federico Pinto ◽  
Camilo Sandoval ◽  
Jorge Gonzalo Diaz ◽  
Alvaro Daniel Vidal ◽  
Jaime Antonio Altamirano ◽  
...  

61 Background: Assesment of pelvic lymph node involvement is a major dilemma due to poor diagnostic accuracy of conventional imaging such as computed tomography of the pelvis or magnetic resonance of the pelvis. Recently incorporation of new tools such as 18F-choline PET/CT address this issue, although there are few studies in this set of patients. To evaluate the 18-choline PET/CT diagnostic accuracy for staging of pelvic lymph node involvement in patients with high risk prostate cancer. Methods: Patients with diagnosis of high risk prostate cancer according to D’Amico risk assessment criteria where staged with a 18F-choline PET/CT prior to treatment with retropubic radical prostatectomy plus superextended bilateral lymph node dissection at our institution. 18F-choline PET/CT was compared with the results of pathological analisys of lymph nodes. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for 18F-choline PET/CT. Results: Between January 2012 and August 2014 a total of 36 patients met the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of high prostate cancer (cT2c or more or PSA above 20 ng/ml or a gleason score 8-10), good performance status (ECOG 0-2) and a 18F-choline PET/CT as a preoperative staging procedure. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were 64%, 92%, 77% and 85% respectively. Conclusions: 18F-choline PET/CT is a non invasive procedure that provides good information regarding pelvic lymph node involvement status that is better than the results of other techniques in published series, with a higher sensitivity in our group of patients. It is highly specific which means there is a very good chance that a patient with a normal study does not have lymph node metastases when analyzed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document