Decarboxylative coupling reactions of propiolic acid derivatives

2018 ◽  
Vol 07 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunwoo Lee
Synthesis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (16) ◽  
pp. 3197-3204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang Song ◽  
Sunwoo Lee ◽  
Jaerim Park

Arylsulfonyl hydrazides were employed as coupling partners for the decarboxylative coupling reaction of propiolic acid derivatives. When the reaction was conducted using Pd(TFA)2 (1.0 mol%), dppp (1.0 mol%), and Cu(OAc)2 (2.4 equiv) in DMF at 100 °C for 0.5 hour, the desired coupled products were formed in moderate to good yields. The reaction showed good tolerance toward functional groups such as ester, ketone, cyano, nitro, chloro, and bromo groups.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 384-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Caporale ◽  
Stefano Tartaggia ◽  
Andrea Castellin ◽  
Ottorino De Lucchi

Two efficient protocols for the palladium-catalyzed synthesis of aryl-2-methyl-3-butyn-2-ols from aryl bromides in the absence of copper were developed. A simple catalytic system consisting of Pd(OAc)2 and P(p-tol)3 using DBU as the base and THF as the solvent was found to be highly effective for the coupling reaction of 2-methyl-3-butyn-2-ol (4) with a wide range of aryl bromides in good to excellent yields. Analogously, the synthesis of aryl-2-methyl-3-butyn-2-ols was performed also through the decarboxylative coupling reaction of 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentynoic acid with aryl bromides, using a catalyst containing Pd(OAc)2 in combination with SPhos or XPhos in the presence of tetra-n-butylammonium fluoride (TBAF) as the base and THF as the solvent. Therefore, new efficient approaches to the synthesis of terminal acetylenes from widely available aryl bromides rather than expensive iodides and using 4 or propiolic acid rather than TMS-acetylene as inexpensive alkyne sources are described.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 2725-2730
Author(s):  
Bidisha R. Bora ◽  
Rashmi Prakash ◽  
Sabera Sultana ◽  
Sanjib Gogoi

Decarbonylative and decarboxylative coupling reactions of salicylaldehydes with isatoic anhydrides afford aryl 2-aminobenzoates.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1368-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju-Hyeon Lee ◽  
Gabriel Charles Edwin Raja ◽  
Jimin Kim ◽  
Kye Chun Nam ◽  
Sunwoo Lee

ChemInform ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
Kyungho Park ◽  
Goun Bae ◽  
Jeongju Moon ◽  
Jaehoon Choe ◽  
Kwang Ho Song ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A.J. O’Hair

AbstractMetal-catalyzed decarboxylative coupling reactions of esters offer new opportunities for formation of C–C bonds with CO2as the only coproduct. Here I provide an overview of: key solution phase literature; thermochemical considerations for decarboxylation of esters and thermolysis of esters in the absence of a metal catalyst. Results from my laboratory on the use of multistage ion trap mass spectrometry experiments and DFT calculations to probe the gas-phase metal catalyzed decarboxylative cross-coupling reactions of allyl acetate and related esters are then reviewed. These studies have explored the role of the metal carboxylate complex in the gas phase decarboxylative coupling of allyl acetate proceeding via a simple two-step catalytic cycle. In Step 1, an organometallic ion, [CH3ML]+/–(where M is a group 10 or 11 metal and L is an auxillary ligand), is allowed to undergo ion-molecule reactions with allyl acetate to generate 1-butene and the metal acetate ion, [CH3CO2ML]+/–. In Step 2, the metal acetate ion is subjected to collision-induced dissociation to reform the organometallic ion and thereby close the catalytic cycle. DFT calculations have been used to explore the mechanisms of these reactions. The organometallic ions [CH3CuCH3]–, [CH3Cu2]+, [CH3AgCu]+and [CH3M(phen)]+(where M = Ni, Pd and Pt) all undergo C–C bond coupling reactions with allyl acetate (Step 1), although the reaction efficiencies and product branching ratios are highly dependant on the nature of the metal complex. For example, [CH3Ag2]+does not undergo C–C bond coupling. Using DFT calculations, a diverse range of mechanisms have been explored for these C–C bond-coupling reactions including: oxidative-addition, followed by reductive elimination; insertion reactions and SN2-like reactions. Which of these mechanisms operate is dependant on the nature of the metal complex. A wide range of organometallic ions can be formed via decarboxylation (Step 2) although these reactions can be in competition with other fragmentation channels. DFT calculations have located different types of transition states for the formation of [CH3CuCH3]–, [CH3Cu2]+, [CH3AgCu]+and [CH3M(phen)]+(where M = Ni, Pd and Pt). Of the catalysts studied to date, [CH3Cu2]+and [CH3Pd(phen)]+are best at promoting C–C bond formation (Step 1) as well as being regenerated (Step 2). Preliminary results on the reactions of [C6H5M(phen)]+(M = Ni and Pd) with C6H5CO2CH2CH=CH2and C6H5CO2CH2C6H5are described.


ChemInform ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
Jeongah Lim ◽  
Kyungho Park ◽  
Aleum Byeun ◽  
Sunwoo Lee

2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 617-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas J. Goossen ◽  
Florence Collet ◽  
Käthe Goossen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document