scholarly journals Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stavros A. Antoniou ◽  
George A. Antoniou ◽  
Oliver O. Koch ◽  
Rudolph Pointner ◽  
Frank A. Granderath
Keyword(s):  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer

scholarly journals An Updated Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhua Zhou ◽  
Weizhi Wang ◽  
Jiwei Wang ◽  
Xiaoyu Zhang ◽  
Qun Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer

Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer: A retrospective cohort study

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Stuart Smith ◽  
Senthilkumar Rajavel Sundaramurthy ◽  
Daniel Croagh
Keyword(s):  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer

scholarly journals Laparoscopic and open repair of perforated peptic ulcer

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 2022
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdel Monem Ibrahim ◽  
Backeet Turkeyev ◽  
Mohammad Mahmood Al Alkatary
Keyword(s):  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Open Approach

Background: The study included patients diagnosed as perforated peptic ulcer. Outcomes are assessed by mortality and morbidity rate, operation time and hospital length of stay.Methods: On the period from January 2013 to December 2014 a total of 71 patients were operated in both facilities: 37 patients in Dubai hospital and 34 in Mafraq Hospital. Open repair with omental patch done in 34 patients (47.9%) and laparoscopically in 37 patients (52.1%). No cases of laparoscopy converted to laparotomy.Results: The data demonstrates homogeneous results for the outcome variables of morbidity and complications, while operation time and hospital length of stay differ significantly. Statistical significance could not be reached for any of these variables, although odd ratios were consistently in favour of the laparoscopic repair. Similarly, the laparoscopic approach resulted in a lower rate of minor complications (10% vs. 23%). Total lengths of stay post open repair made of 4.2±1.2 days, after laparoscopic repair 3.6±0.9 days. At the same time there were observed longer operating times for laparoscopic repair of PPU which constituted 62±10.6 minutes whereas open repair took only 45±12.9 minutes. Peritoneal lavage has been a factor of prolonged duration of laparoscopic surgery.Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair of a perforated peptic ulcer is an amenable and feasible technique within the hands of experienced laparoscopic surgeon. Current evidence does not clearly demonstrate the advantages of laparoscopic versus open repair. Growing interest in the laparoscopic approach may encourage the design of additional randomized trials to analyze its efficacy compared with the open approach.

scholarly journals Predictors of mortality in the elderly after open repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 215 ◽  
pp. 108-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijaya T. Daniel ◽  
Jason T. Wiseman ◽  
Julie Flahive ◽  
Heena P. Santry
Keyword(s):  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Peptic Ulcer Disease ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Ulcer Disease ◽  
Predictors Of Mortality

Laparoscopic Primary Closure: A Better Method of Treatment in Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease than Open Repair

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Gyou Ra Lee ◽  
Jong Kyung Park ◽  
Sung Geun Kim ◽  
Seung Hye Choi ◽  
Sang Seob Yun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Peptic Ulcer Disease ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Ulcer Disease

scholarly journals Laparoscopic versus Open Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Comparative Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 1767-1775
Author(s):  
EL-SAYED ABDULLAH, M.D.; AHMED NEGM, M.D. ◽  
MOHAMED SAMIR, M.D.; MAGDY BASHEER, M.D. ◽  
HOSAM EL-GHADBAN, M.D.; ABD EL-RAHMAN EL-BAHY, M.D. ◽  
AHMED ABD EL-MODABER, M.D.; ASHRAF ABBAS, M.D. ◽  
MAHMOUD AMIN, M.D.; IBRAHIM DAWOUD, M.D.
Keyword(s):  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Perforated Peptic Ulcer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document