scholarly journals Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods for Microbial Community Analysis in Indonesian Tempe Employing Amplified Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
CECILIA ANNA SEUMAHU ◽  
ANTONIUS SUWANTO ◽  
IMAN RUSMANA ◽  
DEDY DURYADI SOLIHIN
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-174
Author(s):  
Rajesh Kumar Vaid ◽  
Taruna Anand ◽  
Priyanka Batra ◽  
Ram Avtar Legha ◽  
Bhupendra Nath Tripathi

DNA isolation is a critical step in microbial community analysis of animal dung. DNA isolation from mule dung is challenging due to microbial diversity, composition and chemical nature of mule dung. Therefore, selection of an appropriate DNA isolation method is important to analyse the complete microbial diversity. In the current study, we evaluated the DNA isolation from mule dung samples (n=11) using QiAmp Mini stool kit as per manufacturer’s procedure with modifications. The results suggest that modifications in proprietary column based method improved the DNA quality and quantity suitable for mule dung microbial community analyses.


2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
YA-BING CHEN ◽  
DAO-LIANG LAN ◽  
CHENG TANG ◽  
XIAO-NONG YANG ◽  
JIAN LI

To more efficiently identify the microbial community of the yak rumen, the standardization of DNA extraction is key to ensure fidelity while studying environmental microbial communities. In this study, we systematically compared the efficiency of several extraction methods based on DNA yield, purity, and 16S rDNA sequencing to determine the optimal DNA extraction methods whose DNA products reflect complete bacterial communities. The results indicate that method 6 (hexadecyltrimethylammomium bromide-lysozyme-physical lysis by bead beating) is recommended for the DNA isolation of the rumen microbial community due to its high yield, operational taxonomic unit, bacterial diversity, and excellent cell-breaking capability. The results also indicate that the bead-beating step is necessary to effectively break down the cell walls of all of the microbes, especially Gram-positive bacteria. Another aim of this study was to preliminarily analyze the bacterial community via 16S rDNA sequencing. The microbial community spanned approximately 21 phyla, 35 classes, 75 families, and 112 genera. A comparative analysis showed some variations in the microbial community between yaks and cattle that may be attributed to diet and environmental differences. Interestingly, numerous uncultured or unclassified bacteria were found in yak rumen, suggesting that further research is required to determine the specific functional and ecological roles of these bacteria in yak rumen. In summary, the investigation of the optimal DNA extraction methods and the preliminary evaluation of the bacterial community composition of yak rumen support further identification of the specificity of the rumen microbial community in yak and the discovery of distinct gene resources.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e0142720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Lu ◽  
Philip Hugenholtz ◽  
Damien John Batstone

AMB Express ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayomi Dilhari ◽  
Asanga Sampath ◽  
Chinthika Gunasekara ◽  
Neluka Fernando ◽  
Deepaka Weerasekara ◽  
...  

AbstractInfected chronic wounds are polymicrobial in nature which include a diverse group of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. Majority of these communal microorganisms are difficult to grow in vitro. DNA fingerprinting methods such as polymerase chain reaction-denaturation gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) facilitate the microbial profiling of complex ecosystems including infected chronic wounds. Six different DNA extraction methods were compared for profiling of the microbial community associated with chronic wound infections using PCR-DGGE. Tissue debris obtained from chronic wound ulcers of ten patients were used for DNA extraction. Total nucleic acid was extracted from each specimen using six DNA extraction methods. The yield, purity and quality of DNA was measured and used for PCR amplification targeting V2–V3 region of eubacterial 16S rRNA gene. QIAGEN DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (K method) produced good quality genomic DNA compared to the other five DNA extraction methods and gave a broad diversity of bacterial communities in chronic wounds. Among the five conventional methods, bead beater/phenol–chloroform based DNA extraction method with STES buffer (BP1 method) gave a yield of DNA with a high purity and resulted in a higher DGGE band diversity. Although DNA extraction using heat and NaOH had the lowest purity, DGGE revealed a higher bacterial diversity. The findings suggest that the quality and the yield of genomic DNA are influenced by the DNA extraction protocol, thus a method should be carefully selected in profiling a complex microbial community.


2010 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 299-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Vanysacker ◽  
Steven A. J. Declerck ◽  
Bart Hellemans ◽  
Luc De Meester ◽  
Ivo Vankelecom ◽  
...  

AMB Express ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayomi Dilhari ◽  
Asanga Sampath ◽  
Chinthika Gunasekara ◽  
Neluka Fernando ◽  
Deepaka Weerasekara ◽  
...  

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.


2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50
Author(s):  
Juhee Shin ◽  
Youngback Kim ◽  
Seung Gu Shin

Objectives:This study was performed to compare three commercial kits for the extraction of genomic DNA from anaerobic digestate for subsequent iSeq 100 sequencing and microbial community analysis.Methods:A full-scale mesophilic biogas plant was sampled, and made into aliquots of identical volumes to extract DNA using three commercial kits: FastDNA spin kit for soil (MP Biomedicals, USA), Exgene stool DNA mini (GeneAll, South Korea) and AccuPrep genomic DNA extraction kit (Bioneer, South Korea). To analyze the microbial communities in the purified DNA, 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing (V3-4 region for bacteria and V4-5 region for archaea) was performed on the Illumina iSeq 100 platform. Quality filtered sequence reads were OTU-clustered for taxonomic assignment conducted using the RDP classifier on-line.Results and Discussion:The microbial community structure visualized on the NMDS plot using the weighted UniFrac distance revealed that both bacteria and archaeal communities have phylogenetic differences depending on the DNA extraction kit used. In addition, the abundance of certain microbial populations was significantly different among the DNA extraction methods. For example, Proteobacteria was the least abundant using the soil kit, while this phylum was the most abundant when the stool kit was used. However, in the case of Thermotogae, this tendency was vice versa. The abundance of archaeal genera Methanomethylovorans and Methanosarcina was also affected by DNA extraction methods.Conclusions:The microbial populations analyzed by 16S based sequencing were affected by DNA extraction methods. To compare microbial community changes in the identical set of research, one DNA extraction method should be chosen and used consistently for the whole experiment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 616-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana-Maria Tanase ◽  
Ioana Mereuta ◽  
Iulia Chiciudean ◽  
Robertina Ionescu ◽  
Ligia Milea ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document