scholarly journals Surgical site infection among patients undergone orthopaedic surgery at Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
A Kisibo ◽  
V.A. Ndume ◽  
A Semiono ◽  
E Mika ◽  
A Sariah ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Guyot ◽  
Graham Layer

Adverse publicity (the ‘superbug') has demonstrated that the problem of MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) is prevalent in many of the country's most prestigious hospitals. The results of the mandatory UK Department of Health (DH) surveillance for early surgical site infections in orthopaedic surgery (SSIS) have been published recently for the period April 2004 to March 2005 when 41,242 operations were studied (< http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistic > 28 October 2005). Infection rates were generally and gratifyingly low but 48% of surgical site infections were caused by Staph. aureus and of those 68% were MRSA. The following article will discuss the aetiology and prevention of MRSA surgical site infection.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-10
Author(s):  
Bikram Prasad Shrestha ◽  
Surya Raj Niraula ◽  
Parvin Nepal ◽  
Guru Prasad Khanal ◽  
Navin Karn ◽  
...  

Introduction: In our country, various institutes have different protocols for postoperative antibiotics. Many western literature have mentioned that administration of prophylactic antibiotics for longer than 24 hours has no advantage and may actually lead to superinfection with drug-resistant organisms. Because of environmental and theater condition most of the surgeon here are very reluctant to use prophylactic antibiotics for only 24 hours. The objective of the study was to find out the effect of duration of prophylactic antibiotics on the rate of surgical site infection in clean elective orthopaedic surgeries. Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial involving 207 clean elective orthopaedic patients undergoing surgery. The patients were divided into three groups which received intravenous prophylactic antibiotics for 24 hours, 48 hours and 48 hours followed by 7 days of oral antibiotics respectively. The patients were followed up for three months postoperatively. Result: There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection among the three groups. Conclusion: We conclude that there is no benefit in prolonging prophylactic antibiotics beyond 24 hours. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/noaj.v3i1.9318   Nepal Orthopedic Association Journal 2013 Vol.3(1): 5-10


2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 723-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Durand ◽  
Philippe Berthelot ◽  
Celine Cazorla ◽  
Frederic Farizon ◽  
Frederic Lucht

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-93
Author(s):  
Stanley Jones ◽  
John Shepherd ◽  
Karen Robinson ◽  
Sumukh A. Khandekar

2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (13) ◽  
pp. 1181-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin E. Richards ◽  
Rondi M. Kauffmann ◽  
Scott L. Zuckerman ◽  
William T. Obremskey ◽  
Addison K. May

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e42254 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. M. Kigera ◽  
Masja Straetemans ◽  
Simplice K. Vuhaka ◽  
Ingeborg M. Nagel ◽  
Edward K. Naddumba ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (46) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Wilson

Surveillance of surgical site infection (SSI) in orthopaedic surgery became mandatory in England in April 2004


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document