scholarly journals Publication pattern of Library and Information Science Digest journal: 2007 – 2016: a bibliometric analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Ebele N. Anyaoku ◽  
Ifeyinwa N. Okonkwo
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Information Science ◽  
Library And Information Science ◽  
Publication Pattern

Scholarly Productivity in Adapted Physical Activity Pedagogy: A Bibliometric Analysis

2001 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 434-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
John O’Connor ◽  
Ron French ◽  
Claudine Sherrill ◽  
Garth Babcock
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Sports Medicine ◽  
Information Science ◽  
Library Science ◽  
Library And Information Science ◽  
Adapted Physical Activity ◽  
Bradford’S Law ◽  
Sport And Exercise ◽  
Pedagogy Literature

The purpose was to determine whether publications pertaining to adapted physical activity (APA) pedagogy in the core serials from 1988 to 1998 adhere to library science laws. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on 770 articles in 259 serials selected from 4,130 serials initially identified in four databases (Article First, ERIC, Medline, Sport Discus). Results indicated that 1,720 authors have constructed the early APA pedagogy literature. Of these, only 11 contributed four or more articles. The scatter of APA pedagogy literature over four zones, with 4, 15, 64, and 176 journals in the zones, respectively, supports Bradford’s law of scattering. Price’s law was not supported because most authors contributed only one article. Most pedagogy articles (n = 184) were published in Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise, Physician and Sports Medicine, and Palaestra. Graduate education should include exposure to bibliometrics and collaboration with library and information science specialists.

Research productivity of library scholars

2015 ◽  
Vol 116 (7/8) ◽  
pp. 433-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munazza Jabeen ◽  
Liu Yun ◽  
Muhammad Rafiq ◽  
Misbah Jabeen
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Information Science ◽  
Average Rate ◽  
Library Science ◽  
Library And Information Science ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Journal Citation Reports ◽  
Mapping Software ◽  
Library Professionals

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore, by a quantitative analysis, growth rates of, and trends in, global publications in the field of library and information science (LIS) produced by library science professionals. Design/methodology/approach – A survey approach was used in this paper. Journal Citation Reports 2010 was the major source for selecting 40 LIS core journals. A bibliometric analysis was conducted. Visualization and mapping software was utilized to present a picture of the growth in and trends relating to LIS publications. Findings – A total of 18,371 research articles were published from 2003 to 2012. A significant growth rate (11.37 per cent) was found in 2009. Self-citation tendencies have been increasing, with an average rate of 38.56 per cent. Of all publication types, “article” was the most popular among LIS researchers. China has contributed remarkably in terms of collaborative publications. Practical implications – The present study could be helpful for library professionals, subject specialists and policy makers. These findings may encourage library professionals to integrate and monitor library functions through bibliometric analysis. Originality/value – This paper identifies growth and trends in publications by LIS researchers through use of bibliometrics.

Publication trends in library and information science

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 134-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.P. Singh ◽  
Harish Chander
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Information Science ◽  
Library And Information Science ◽  
Journal Articles ◽  
Publication Trends ◽  
Citation Pattern ◽  
Authorship Pattern ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Library Management

Purpose – The purpose of the study is to explore the publication trends of the scholarly journal Library Management, and highlight its various important aspects. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents results of bibliometric analysis of 336 articles which were published during the period 2006-2012, in the Library Management journal of Emerald. Findings – The results indicate that the majority of the contributions by single authors and most cited documents are journal articles. The study highlights the chronological distribution of articles, authorship pattern, geographical distribution of authors, institutions wise distribution, citation pattern and length of articles. Originality/value – As yet there have been no such studies conducted that investigate the various aspects of Library Management journal. It evaluates the publication trends of the journal and has important implications for scholars and researchers.

scholarly journals Domestic Dissertations in the area of Library and Information Science, Bibliography and Bibliology [Ending]

2015 ◽  
pp. 42-46
Author(s):  
Tat’yana V. Eremenko
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Quantitative Data ◽  
Information Science ◽  
Scientific Discipline ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Mathematical Statistics ◽  
Library And Information Science ◽  
Academic Degree ◽  
Analytical Review ◽  
Bibliometric Studies

The author presents the comparative analytical review of bibliometric studies of the domestic dissertations, defended in disciplines 05.25.03 - Library and Information science, Bibliography and Bibliology. There are revealed discrepancies in quantitative data and some contradictions in the findings of different authors on the periods of scientific activities. For the purpose of refining and updating information there was studied collection of dissertations on these disciplines for the period of 1986-2013, using such criteria of bibliometric analysis as a year of defending the thesis, academic degree for which dissertation was defended, content of dissertation (by the field of science specified in the passport of scientific discipline). There are determined periods of scientific activity in the formation of the collection of dissertations. On the basis of methods of mathematical statistics there is studied the uniformity of depositing thesis collection by annual flows.

PRODUKTIVITAS PENULIS ARTIKEL ILMIAH BIDANG ILMU INFORMASI DAN PERPUSTAKAAN PADA JURNAL TERAKREDITASI PERINGKAT SINTA 2, 3 DAN 4 TAHUN 2015-2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-128
Author(s):  
Sri Junandi ◽  
Dwiyantoro Dwiyantoro
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Information Science ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Critical Value ◽  
Library And Information Science ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Scientific Journals ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Productivity Pattern

There are 15 scientific journals in the field of Library and Information Science (LIS) accredited and indexed by Science and Technology Index (SINTA). The journals are divided by rating namely SINTA 2 (4 journals), SINTA 3 (4 journals) and SINTA 4 (7 journals). This study aims to determine the productivity pattern of authors in the field of LIS in 2015 - 2019 indexed in SINTA 2, 3 and 4 based on Lotka's rules. The research approach is quantitative with bibliometric analysis.  The results show that based on: (1) article published during 2015 – 2019, there were 1,806 authors with a frequency of article writing 1,061; (2) the calculation of the author's productivity pattern, shows the value of n = 0.93062 and the value of C = 0.74864; and (3) the K-S test results show that the Dmax value was greater than the critical value for SINTA 2 and 4, while for the SINTA 3 the Dmax value was smaller (0.0172) than the critical value (0.108).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document