scholarly journals Bond strength according to the moment of fiber post cutting fixed with self-adhesive cement to the root dentin

Author(s):  
E. Silva ◽  
C. Pereira ◽  
F. Limeira ◽  
P. Affonso ◽  
A. Moreira ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asma Altaf ◽  
Lekha Santhosh ◽  
A. Srirekha ◽  
Srinivas Panchajanya ◽  
T. Jaykumar


2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Kalkan ◽  
Aslihan Usumez ◽  
A. Nilgun Ozturk ◽  
Sema Belli ◽  
Gurcan Eskitascioglu


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 415-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faisal Abdullah Alonaizan ◽  
Yasser F. AlFawaz ◽  
Abdulaziz Alsahhaf ◽  
Raneem S. Alofi ◽  
Khulud Abdulrahman Al-Aali ◽  
...  


2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 555-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
GM Gomes ◽  
OMM Gomes ◽  
A Reis ◽  
JC Gomes ◽  
AD Loguercio ◽  
...  

SUMMARY Objectives To evaluate the influence of operator experience (dentist vs student) and cementation system (Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose [SBMP] + RelyX ARC [1]; Adper Single Bond 2 [SB] + RelyX ARC [2] and RelyX U100 [3]) on the push-out bond strength (BS) of fiber post to radicular dentin. Materials and Methods The roots of 48 extracted human maxillary central incisors were prepared and divided into six groups (n=8), according to combination of the above factors. Glass fiber posts were cemented in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer of each cementation system. After water storage at 37°C for one week, the roots were cross-sectioned into six 1-mm thick slices and the push-out test was performed (0.5 mm/min). Data were statistically analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests (α=0.05). The BS results obtained by dentist and student for each cementation system were compared using the Student t-test (α=0.05). Results Higher BS means were observed for the expert operators, irrespective of the cementation system used (p=0.006). RelyX U100 showed the highest bond strength, but it did not differ from SBMP + RelyX ARC. The Student t-test revealed that only RelyX U100 was not affected by the operator's experience. Conclusion Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that the self-adhesive cement RelyX U100 showed the highest bond strength to the root canal in the student's group, and its performance was not affected by the operator's experience.



2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karla G.F. Gomes ◽  
Natália S. Faria ◽  
Walter R. Neto ◽  
Vivian Colucci ◽  
Erica A. Gomes


2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 452-457
Author(s):  
Houssam Jassar ◽  
Hassan El Husseini

ABSTRACT Aims and objectives The fiber post type used in restoring endodontically treated teeth may affect the dental expert decision in the case of dental malpractice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the low-cost commercial fiber post in comparison with a higher cost or well-known documented fiber post system. Materials and methods A total of 20 premolars were selected for the study; following endodontic treatment, specimens were randomly divided into two groups of 10 specimens each according to the type of fiber post used: (1) Low-cost commercial fiber post (OYAPost, Taper Lucent, OYARICOM) and (2) higher cost well-known fiber post (Rely X Fiber post, 3M ESPE). Both fiber posts were cemented using self-adhesive cement (Rely X Unicem). Samples were subjected to push-out bond strength and to failure analysis. One-way analysis of variance was used (p < 0.005). Results There was no significant difference between the bond strength of the two tested groups (p > 0.05), while statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was noted between the different post space regions (cervical, middle, and apical). Conclusion Based on the evidence from the study, it can be concluded that the type of fiber post should not affect the dental expert decision in the case of dental malpractice/lawsuit. Clinical significance All types of low-cost fiber posts may behave similarly to other higher cost or well-documented fiber posts. How to cite this article Ayoub F, Jassar H, El Husseini H, Salameh Z. Choice of Endodontic Fiber Posts and its Influence on Dental Malpractice: An in vitro Evaluation. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(6):452-457.



2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 559-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matheus Coelho Bandéca ◽  
Adriano Augusto Melo de Mendonça ◽  
Etevaldo Matos Maia Filho ◽  
Fausto da Silva Bramante ◽  
Darlon Martins Lima ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT This study evaluated the influence of relining fiber posts on the bond strength (BS) of resin cements in the root canal. Forty bovine teeth were divided in four groups (n = 10)G1 (ARC)—fiber post cemented with resin cement RelyX ARC; G2 (ARC+Z350)—relined fiber post cemented with RelyX ARC; G3 (U200)—fiber post cemented with self-adhesive cement RelyX U200; G4 (U200+Z350)—relined fiber post cemented with RelyX U200. The roots were sectioned in six 1.2-mm slices and the push-out test was performed. Data were analyzed by three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). For the conventional resin cement, there was no significant difference between groups G1-ARC (15.5 ± 3.8) and G2-ARC+Z350 (16.1 ± 4.5). For the self-adhesive cement, the results revealed higher BS values for relined posts G4-U200 + Z350 (19.9 ± 7.9) as compared to non-relined posts G3-U200 (14.4 ± 4.5). For both cements, in groups of relined posts, the apical and the cervical thirds presented similar BS. Relining enhances the performance of the self-adhesive resin cement, and the interaction between relining and root third influences the BS to the conventional resin cement. How to cite this article Conde DM, Rodrigues VP, de Fátima Carvalho Souza S, Bauer JRO, da Silva Bramante F, Lima SNL, Filho EMM, Bandeca MC, de Mendonça AAM, Lima DM. Influence of Relining Post on the Bond Strength of Resin Cements. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(7):559-564.





2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faisal Abdullah Alonaizan ◽  
Raneem S. Alofi ◽  
Yasser F. AlFawaz ◽  
Abdulaziz Alsahhaf ◽  
Khulud Abdulrahman Al-Aali ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
Vol 83 (7) ◽  
pp. 824-833
Author(s):  
Shu Wan ◽  
Yujie Tan ◽  
Jing Xie ◽  
Xiaoyu Huang ◽  
Ling Guo


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document