Does Preheating Resin Cements Affect Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Restorations?

This paper assesses the impact of preheating of adhesive cement on the fracture resistance of lithium disilicate and zirconia restorations. Methods: A total of 80 human maxillary premolar teeth were assigned into 8 groups (n = 10) according to material type (either lithium disilicate or zirconia) and type of resin cement (either LinkForce or Panavia SA) with preheating temperature at 54 °C or at room temperature (25 °C). Teeth were prepared and restored with either lithium disilicate or zirconia restorations. After cementation, specimens were thermal cycled (10,000 cycles, 5 °C̸55 °C), then load cycled for 240,000 cycles (50 N). Each specimen was statically loaded until fracture and the load (N) at fracture was recorded, then the failure mode was detected. Statistical analysis of data was performed (p ≤ 0.05). Results: There was no significant difference (p = 0.978) in fracture mean values between LinkForce and Panavia SA. Statistically significant difference (p = 0.001) was revealed between fracture resistance of lithium disilicate restorations cemented with LinkForce at 25 °C and at 54 °C; however there was no significant difference (p = 0.92) between the fracture resistance of lithium disilicate restorations cemented with Panavia SA used at 25 °C and at 54 °C. Regarding the interaction between ceramic material, cement type, and cement preheating, there was no significant effect (p > 0.05) in fracture resistance. The cement type does not influence the fracture resistance of ceramic restorations. Preheating of resin cement has negatively influenced the fracture resistance of all tested groups, except for lithium disilicate cemented using LinkForce cement.

Intraradicular rehabilitation of a necrotic, immature tooth using MTA, a fiber post and composite resin - A case report

Endodontic treatment of necrotic, immature teeth with open apices can present challenges to debridement, disinfection, and optimal obturation. These teeth may have widely flared canals and thin radicular dentinal walls that are susceptible to fracture. Management of the open apex can be performed using a mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) apical plug. To ensure a better prognosis in such structurally compromised teeth, internal radicular reinforcement using fiber posts and a self-adhesive cement has been suggested. The present case report illustrates the management of a necrotic, immature maxillary right central incisor in a 10-year-old patient using the MTA apical barrier technique and canal reinforcement using a fiber post.

Material Thickness Influence on Fracture Load of Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic Network CAD/CAM Restorations

Polymer infiltrated ceramics are hybrid materials that combine the strength of ceramics and the flexibility of polymers. The aim of this study was to compare the fracture load capacity of monolithic CAD/CAM crowns with different occlusal thicknesses, made from polymer infiltrated ceramic network. Fifteen full contour CAD/CAM crowns made of Vita Enamic with occlusal thicknesses of 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm and 1.5 mm were fabricated with a wet milling machine. Restorations were cemented on human molars with adhesive cement. Samples were loaded along the long axis until fracture, with a single static compressive force. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to examine the fracture surface of specimens after the fracture. The results of this study reveals that the fracture load of the samples increased progressively with the occlusal thickness. The highest fracture value was recorded for1.5 mm occlusal thickness of the crown. No statistically significant difference was reported between the three experimental groups. It can be concluded that hybrid monolithic CAD-CAM crowns showed sufficient fracture strength to be used for single restorations in the posterior area, even with a reduced occlusal thickness.

Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements

This systematic review aims to evaluate the different pretreatments of the zirconia surface and resin cement in order to determine a valid operative protocol for adhesive cementation. Methodologies conducted for this study followed the Prisma (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. An electronic search was performed in four databases. The established focus question was: “What type of surface conditioning method is the one that obtains the best adhesion values to zirconia over time by applying a resin cement?” Forty-five relevant papers were found to qualify for final inclusion. In total, 260 different surface pretreatment methods, mainly combinations of air-abrasion protocols and adhesive promoters, were investigated. Altogether, the use of two artificial aging methods, three types of cement and four testing methods was reported. The results showed that mechanicochemical surface pretreatments offered the best adhesive results. Self-adhesive cement and those containing 10-MDP obtained the best results in adhesion to zirconia. Artificial aging reduced adhesion, so storage in water for 30 days or thermocycling for 5000 cycles is recommended. A standardized adhesive protocol has not been established due to a lack of evidence

Influence of Hydrofluoric and Nitric Acid Pre-Treatment and Type of Adhesive Cement on Retention of Zirconia Crowns

Background: The aim of this study was to test the impact of hot acids etching and two types of adhesive cement on the retention of zirconia crowns. Methods: Forty maxillary premolars were prepared, and zirconia crowns were designed and fabricated with proximal extensions, then divided into 4 groups (n = 10). Group AP; the crowns were air-abraded and cemented using Panavia SA Cement. Group AL; the crowns were air- abraded and cemented using GC LinkForce. Group AHP; the crowns were air-abraded, etched with the hot acids (48% hydrofluoric acid and 69% nitric acid), and cemented using Panavia SA Cement. Group AHL; the crowns were air-abraded, etched with the hot acids, and cemented using GC LinkForce. Each zirconia crown was pre-treated and bonded to its corresponding tooth. After thermocycling (5–55 °C/10,000), the retention test was performed and the load required to dislodge the crown was reported in Newton (N), and mode of failure was recorded. The retention strength (MPa) was calculated for each tested variable and statistically analyzed. Results: Group AHP showed the highest mean value of the retention strength, followed by group AP then group AHL. Group AL showed the lowest value. A statistically significant effect (p = 0.001) of the hot acids etching on the retention of zirconia crown was found. Also, there was a significant effect (p = 0.000) of the cement type. The interaction between surface treatment and the cement type has no significant impact (p = 0.882). The main mode of failure for Panavia SA Cement is mixed mode of failure, while for G-CEM LinkForce is adhesive failure. Conclusions: Hot acid etching pre-treatment improved the retention of zirconia crown. Usage of Panavia SA Cement with hot acids etching is effective can be used for adhesive cementation of zirconia crown.