Does GM Technology Pay Rich Dividends? Refl ections from Bt Cotton Farmers in Maharashtra

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
GT Gujar ◽  
CD Mayee ◽  
B Choudhary ◽  
A Suresh

AbstractBiased conclusions of long-term impact of Bt cotton published in Nature Plants March 2020 threatens to derail technological development. We therefore advocate integrating available technologies for sustainability of Bt adoption in India and prospecting for all including biotechnological developments.


2005 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Puyun Yang ◽  
Kunwen Li ◽  
Shangbai Shi ◽  
Jingyuan Xia ◽  
Rong Guo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 524
Author(s):  
Guang Tian ◽  
Xiaoxue Du ◽  
Fangbin Qiao ◽  
Andres Trujillo-Barrera

Although the benefits of genetically modified (GM) crops have been well documented, how do farmers manage the risk of new technology in the early stages of technology adoption has received less attention. We compare the total factor productivity (TFP) of cotton to other major crops (wheat, rice, and corn) in China between 1990 and 2015, showing that the TFP growth of cotton production is significantly different from all other crops. In particular, the TFP of cotton production increased rapidly in the early 1990s then declined slightly around 2000 and rose again. This pattern coincides with the adoption of Bt cotton process in China. To further investigate the decline of TFP in the early stages of Bt cotton adoption, using aggregate provincial-level data, we implement a TFP decomposition and show that the productivity of GM technology is higher, whereas the technical efficiency of GM technology is lower than that of traditional technologies. Especially, Bt cotton exhibited lower technical efficiency because farmers did not reduce the use of pesticide when they first started to adopt Bt cotton. In addition, we illustrate the occurrence of a learning process as GM technology diffuses throughout China: after farmers gain knowledge of Bt cotton, pesticide use declines and technical efficiency improves.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-100
Author(s):  
A.S. Shridevi ◽  
S.V. Halakatti
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousouf Ismael ◽  
Richard Bennett ◽  
Stephen Morse

This paper describes the method and findings of a survey designed to explore the economic benefits of the adoption of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton for smallholder farmers in the Republic of South Africa. The study found reason for cautious optimism in that the Bt variety generally resulted in a per hectare increase in yields and value of output with a reduction in pesticide costs, which outweighed the increase in seed costs to give a substantial increase in gross margins. Thus, these preliminary results suggest that Bt cotton is good for smallholder cotton farmers and the environment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 869-884
Author(s):  
Asheesh Navneet

The article mainly deals with the complications involved in the regulation of genetically modified (GM) technology in India by comparing it with the regulatory mechanisms developed in the USA and the European Union (EU). The only GM crop that has been approved for commercial cultivation in India is Bt cotton. It has been observed that apart from Bt cotton, whenever the Indian regulatory bodies tried to approve any other GM food crops, protests have erupted from several sections of the Indian civil society. As a result, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) has been compelled to take political decision of not to allow GM crops for commercial cultivation. This led to the increase in the political conflict among supporters and detractors of GM crop technology. Both the USA and the EU have explicitly established either product-based or process-based regulatory approaches. But in India, the regulation is still evolving. In that respect, this article highlights some of the existing regulatory loopholes and kinds of confusions that prevail in Indian regulatory system.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 459-464
Author(s):  
JAGMIT SINGH ◽  
DHARMINDER SINGH
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
G.H. Baker ◽  
C.R. Tann ◽  
P. Verwey ◽  
L. Lisle

AbstractThe use of Bt cotton varieties has greatly reduced the amount of conventional insecticides required to control lepidopteran pests, Helicoverpa armigera and Helicoverpa punctigera, in Australia, but the possibility that these moths might become resistant to Bt remains a threat. Consequently, a Resistance Management Plan, which includes the mandatory growing of refuge crops (pigeon pea and non-Bt cotton; both C3 plants), has been established for Bt cotton farmers. However, knowledge of the relative contributions made to overall moth populations from the many host origins (both C3 and C4 plants) available to these insects throughout cotton production regions remains limited, as do the scales of movement and spatial mixing of moths within and between these areas. This study used stable isotope signatures (in particular δ13C) to help identify where moths fed as larvae within separate cotton production regions which differed in their proportions of C3 and C4 host crops (e.g. cotton and sorghum, respectively). C3-derived moths predominated in the early season, but C4-derived moths increased in frequency later. The overall proportion of C4 moths was higher in H. armigera than in H. punctigera. Whilst the relative proportions of C3 and C4 moths differed between regions, no differences in such proportiorns were found at smaller spatial scales, nor were there significant correlations between crop composition and isotope signatures in moths. Overall, these results suggest that C4 host plants are likely to be very important in offsetting the development of Bt resistance in these insects and such influences may operate across multiple regions within a single growing season.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document