The Real Strength of Protection.

2017 ◽  
pp. 257-269
Author(s):  
Henry George
Keyword(s):  
The Real ◽  
BDJ ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 202 (11) ◽  
pp. 641-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Grace
Keyword(s):  
The Real ◽  

1964 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Clower

If successful prediction were the sole criterion of the merit of a science, economics should long since have ceased to exist as a serious intellectual pursuit. Accurate prognosis is not its forte. The real strength of the discipline lies in another direction—namely, in its apparently limitless capacity to rationalize events after they happen. This helps explain the indifference of most economic theorists to “the lessons of history”; men to whom all things are possible have little to learn from experiments conducted in the laboratory of time. It also helps explain the indifference of most economic historians to abstract theory; what have they to learn from a subject that “yields no predictions, summarizes no empirical generalizations, provides no useful framework of analysis”?


1973 ◽  
Vol 18 (72) ◽  
pp. 583-591
Author(s):  
A. B. Cooke ◽  
J. R. Vincent

The electoral debacle of 1874 removed only the least important aspect of Irish liberalism. The real strength of the liberal approach to Irish government continued to lie in the much less accessible, but much more important, official world of Dublin Castle which, in the early 1880s, was still confidently running Ireland as it thought best without too much reference to public opinion. The emergence of militant nationalism should not divert attention from the plain fact that the government of the country remained firmly in the hands of liberal-minded administrators, of whom very little is known. Dublin Castle, like Whitehall, guarded its secrets with care, the great scandal of 1884 marking the single departure from normal practice. The high value which the liberal establishment of 1880–85 placed on discretion is registered most forcibly through the lack of memoirs written by senior officials, whose competent management of affairs deserved a permanent literary memorial. No Boswell, or even Edward Hamilton (Downing Street's uncritical diarist at this time), came forward to describe the régime at work or at play. Unpublicised achievements are easily forgotten: and in this case the problem of penetrating a wall of silence is made more difficult by the absence of most of the appropriate archives. Apart from Spencer himself, only Thomas O'Hagan, the Irish lord chancellor (1880–81) and one of the least important figures in Forster's circle, seems to have preserved a substantial body of papers, though further discoveries may still be made.


1984 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 275-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Szechi

Religion was the ideological motor of politics in the first age of party. Though the distinction between the Whig and Tory positions on religious issues was often small compared to their internal divisions on other matters, religion was felt to be the only real justification for both parties. The Whigs stood for a cosmopolitan Erastianism embracing protestant dissent, the Tories for a stronger, national Church for which religious uniformity was still a worthwhile goal. The Church was inextricably caught up in these national political divisions, and its own internecine warfare between high and low church mirrored them exactly. It naturally followed from this that religious issues were the most passionately upheld by the Whigs and the Tories, and were those which had most impact on national politics. Hence the Tories put themselves out of office in 1704–5 by the zeal with which they tried to push the Occasional Conformity Bill through, even though it was certain to create a constitutional crisis which would paralyse the British war-effort against France. And the Whigs seized the opportunity to ‘roast a parson’ afforded by Henry Sacheverell’s high church ranting on the theme of ‘the Church in Danger’ by trying to impeach him. Their partial success only served to validate and refresh the ‘Church in Danger’ preaching they had hoped to silence, and they were crushed by an avalanche of outraged Toryism in the 1710 election. Since religious issues were the most keenly felt and constituted the central dynamic of the party battle, the translation of religious conflict from the nation at large to Westminster gives us a glimpse of the real strength of religion’s hold on the concept of party, and hence its influence in contemporary politics.


1915 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 21-64
Author(s):  
J. Conway Davies

As an isolated episode the Despenser war is of little interest and less importance, but taken as a characteristic expression of baronial opposition and royal policy as controlled by favourites, it assumes a position of considerable importance in the reign of Edward II. The events in Wales during the reign have a real and intimate connection with the great crises in the struggle between the King and his barons. This was to some extent inevitable. By crushing the last traces of independence in Wales, Edward I had removed a dangerous enemy of the English Crown. He failed to effect the corollary that such a fact involved. The marcher privileges remained undiminished, and the marcher energies which could no longer find employment in the struggle against the Welsh, sought a new direction in the fertile field of English politics. It was in the troubles that followed the divisions of the Gloucester inheritance among the co-heiresses that the real expression of baronial feeling in the marches was made, and the real strength of the baronial power realised. Questions of great constitutional importance were involved in the dispute. The present intention is to give merely the chronicle of events which led up to the outbreak and a summary of its immediate results.


Tempo ◽  
1953 ◽  
pp. 21-22
Author(s):  
William Furtwängler
Keyword(s):  
The Real ◽  
Know How ◽  

The reaction of an audience will somehow always be commensurate with the effect created, precisely because it is subconscious. Thus there are works that release noisy and vociferous, yet meaningless and empty, applause: it echoes their own emptiness. And there are others to which the audience reacts less spontaneously, yet whose worth is not only immeasurably greater but their effect immeasurably deeper. It is definitely wrong to draw conclusions from the effect made on an audience, i.e. from the volume of the applause, as to the real strength of the impression made by a work, let alone as to its quality. The audience itself—this curious something—does not know how and why it reacts; it reacts automatically and subconsciously, more or less like a barometer. What matters is that one should know how to read this barometer aright and how to interpret that reading.


1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-176
Author(s):  
A. L. Isakov ◽  
A. K. Tkachuk

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Dominik Güss ◽  
Dietrich Dörner

AbstractLake et al. discuss building blocks of human intelligence that are quite different from those of artificial intelligence. We argue that a theory of human intelligence has to incorporate human motivations and emotions. The interaction of motivation, emotion, and cognition is the real strength of human intelligence and distinguishes it from artificial intelligence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document