Prenatal Ontogeny of Sensory Responsiveness and Learning

1998 ◽  
pp. 602-617
1991 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 463-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott R. Robinson ◽  
William P. Smotherman

Pain Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1902-1912
Author(s):  
Naama Assayag ◽  
Yoram Bonneh ◽  
Shula Parush ◽  
Haim Mell ◽  
Ricky Kaplan Neeman ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective This comparative cross-sectional study aimed to characterize individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) in self-perception of pain sensitivity, experimental auditory aversiveness, and non-noxious sensory responsiveness, as well as examine the associations with SUD. Methods Therapeutic community (TC) individuals with SUD (N = 63, male 88.9%) and healthy controls (N = 60, male 86.7%) completed the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) and the Sensory Responsiveness Questionnaire–Intensity Scale (SRQ-IS), followed by a psychophysical auditory battery, the Battery of Averseness to Sounds (BAS)–Revised. Results The SUD group scored higher on the PSQ (P < 0.0001), BAS-R aversiveness (P < 0.0001), BAS-R-unpleasantness (P < 0.0001), and on the aftersensation of auditory aversiveness (P < 0.0001) and unpleasantness (P < 0.000). Fifty-four percent of the SUD group vs 11.7% of the control group were identified as having sensory modulation dysfunction (SMD; P < 0.0001). Logistic regression modeling revealed that the SRQ-IS-Aversive score had a stronger relationship, indicating a 12.6-times odds ratio for SUD (P = 0.0002). Finally, a risk score calculated from a linear combination of the logistic regression model parameters is presented based on the PSQ and SRQ. Conclusions This is the first study to explore sensory and aversive domains using experimental and self-reporting in situ, revealing pain perception alteration that co-occurs with high prevalence of SMD, specifically of the over-responsive type. Findings may be significant in clinical practice for treating pain, and for expanding therapeutic modalities as part of broader rehabilitation in TC and beyond, to better meet personalized therapy.


Author(s):  
Lutz Vollrath ◽  
John Fraher ◽  
Ian Whitmore ◽  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 775
Author(s):  
Jacob Feldman ◽  
Margaret Cassidy ◽  
Yupeng Liu ◽  
Anne Kirby ◽  
Mark Wallace ◽  
...  

Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition defined by differences in social communication and by the presence of restricted and repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, and activities (RRBs). Individuals with autism also commonly present with atypical patterns of sensory responsiveness (i.e., hyporesponsiveness, hyperresponsiveness, and sensory seeking), which are theorized to produce cascading effects across other domains of development. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in sensory responsiveness in children with and without autism (ages 8–18 years), as well as relations between patterns of sensory responsiveness and core and related features of autism. Participants were 50 children with autism and 50 non-autistic peers matched on age and sex. A comprehensive clinical battery included multiple measures of sensory responsiveness, core features of autism, adaptive behavior, internalizing behaviors, cognitive ability, and language ability. Groups significantly differed on all three patterns of sensory responsiveness. Some indices of core and related autism features were robustly associated with all three patterns of sensory responsiveness (e.g., RRBs), while others were more strongly associated with discrete patterns of sensory responsiveness (i.e., internalizing problem behaviors and hyperresponsiveness, language and sensory seeking). This study extends prior work to show that differences in sensory responsiveness that are linked with core and related features of autism persist in older children and adolescents on the spectrum.


1987 ◽  
Vol 243 (2) ◽  
pp. 603-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
R D Pearce ◽  
J W Callahan ◽  
P B Little ◽  
D T Armstrong ◽  
D Kiehm ◽  
...  

beta-D-Mannosidase activity in selected normal adult, neonatal and foetal goat tissues and in tissues from animals affected with caprine beta-mannosidosis was examined with the use of 4-methylumbelliferyl beta-D-mannopyranoside as substrate. The enzyme in normal adult thyroid, kidney and brain exhibited a sharp unimodal pH optimum at pH 5.0, whereas the enzyme in both normal adult and mutant liver exhibited broad pH ranges of activity (pH 4.5-8.0). No residual enzyme was detectable in mutant kidney or brain; in contrast, residual activity in mutant liver was 52% of that in a neonatal control. Concanavalin A-Sepharose 4B (Con A-Sepharose) fractionation of normal adult liver beta-D-mannosidase resolved the enzyme into an unbound (non-lysosomal) from (52%) with a broad pH range of activity (pH 4.5-8.0) and a bound (lysosomal) form (48%) with a sharp pH optimum of 5.5. The enzyme in mutant liver consisted entirely of the unbound (non-lysosomal) form. Beta-D-Mannosidase activity in normal adult thyroid, kidney and brain was resolved by chromatofocusing into two major isoenzymes, with pI 5.5 and 5.9, and traces of a minor isoenzyme, with pI 5.0. In normal adult liver the enzyme was also resolved into three isoenzymes with similar pI values; however, that with pI 5.0 predominated. The predominant form of the enzyme in 60-day-foetal liver was bound by Con A, exhibited a unimodal pH optimum (5.0) and was resolved into two isoenzymes, with pI 5.4 and 5.8; only traces of an isoenzyme with pI 5.0 were detectable. Total hepatic beta-D-mannosidase activity increased progressively towards adult values during the last 90 days of gestation as a result of increasing non-lysosomal isoenzyme activity (pI 5.0). Lysosomal beta-D-mannosidase was shown to occur in all normal goat tissues studied as multiple isoenzymes, which are genetically and developmentally distinct from the non-lysosomal isoenzyme occurring predominantly, if not exclusively, in liver.


2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donja Rodic ◽  
Andrea Hans Meyer ◽  
Roselind Lieb ◽  
Gunther Meinlschmidt

1992 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott R. Robinson ◽  
William P. Smotherman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document