Crystal Growth of Organic Materials

2020 ◽  
pp. 45-66
Author(s):  
Ch. Bosshard ◽  
K. Sutter ◽  
Ph. Prêtre ◽  
J. Hulliger ◽  
M. Flörsheimer ◽  
...  
1977 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 869-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. H. Babai ◽  
R. B. Dyott ◽  
E. A. D. White

1992 ◽  
Vol 63 (11) ◽  
pp. 5481-5482 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. D. Aggarwal ◽  
W. S. Wang ◽  
Angela W. Shields ◽  
Benjamin G. Penn ◽  
Donald O. Frazier

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1697-1702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongjin Li ◽  
Xiaotao Zhang ◽  
Huanli Dong ◽  
Qikai Li ◽  
Zhigang Shuai ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 861-861
Author(s):  
Peter J. Halfpenny ◽  
Xiaojun Lai ◽  
Kevin J. Roberts

Author(s):  
P.J. Killingworth ◽  
M. Warren

Ultimate resolution in the scanning electron microscope is determined not only by the diameter of the incident electron beam, but by interaction of that beam with the specimen material. Generally, while minimum beam diameter diminishes with increasing voltage, due to the reduced effect of aberration component and magnetic interference, the excited volume within the sample increases with electron energy. Thus, for any given material and imaging signal, there is an optimum volt age to achieve best resolution.In the case of organic materials, which are in general of low density and electric ally non-conducting; and may in addition be susceptible to radiation and heat damage, the selection of correct operating parameters is extremely critical and is achiev ed by interative adjustment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document