Comparative analysis of indicator-based urban sustainability assessment frameworks

2019 ◽  
pp. 59-86
Author(s):  
Ellie Tonks ◽  
Stanislav E. Shmelev
2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 1117-1122
Author(s):  
Ayumu Funamoto ◽  
Rikutaro Manabe ◽  
Akito Murayama ◽  
Junichiro Okata

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 9348
Author(s):  
Denis Michalina ◽  
Peter Mederly ◽  
Hans Diefenbacher ◽  
Benjamin Held

The issue of urban sustainability is currently exceptionally up to date, and the sustainable development of cities has become an important topic on the political level. Many cities in the world are facing acute challenges concerning growing dangers to the environment and ensuring quality of life for their inhabitants. In connection with cities achieving their individual goals of sustainable development, urban sustainability indicator frameworks (USIFs) are becoming the subjects of attention. Such frameworks enable sustainability to be clearly measured and assessed. In this article, we analysed selected global and European USIFs in terms of their commonalities and differences, sustainability dimensions, thematic categories, and categorised indicators. Based on the analysis of the content of the reviewed frameworks, we compiled a list of generally recognised thematic categories within the four main dimensions of sustainable development, and we identified the key indicators of urban sustainability. Our review showed differences in the existing approaches that substantially contributed to the current inconsistencies in assessing and measuring sustainable development in cities. Our results provide an overview of this issue, e.g., to decision makers, and could concurrently serve as a generally applicable foundation for the creation of new urban sustainability indicator frameworks. We also point out the current trends and challenges in the domain of urban sustainability assessment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 3551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Feleki ◽  
Charisios Achillas ◽  
Christos Vlachokostas ◽  
Alexandra Michailidou ◽  
Leticia Ortega ◽  
...  

Globalisation combined with high urbanisation trends affects not only the traditional pillars of sustainability (environment, society, and economy), but also local identity. Customs and traditions are fading away and alienation is the result of new lifestyles deriving mainly from high interaction between locals and foreigners (focus on tourism). Facing the challenge of characterising urban sustainability, reflection on special characteristics of the urban fabric that are affected (spatial dimension of sustainability) is not always considered. Even though a lot of research is dedicated to the characterisation of urban areas’ sustainability, the element of local, regional, and macro-regional identity seems not to be systematically incorporated. This work attempts to develop and test a methodological framework to identify and prioritise the common symbolic elements that constitute the identity of a group of cities and that need to be sustained. The study focuses on the Euro-Mediterranean region. A survey is addressed to 64 scientists from five cities: Dubrovnik, Genoa, Rhodes, Valencia, and Venice. “Urban structure” is revealed as the most important element that constitutes the “Mediterranean identity”. Moreover, the level of threat deriving from mass tourism on the “Mediterranean identity” is estimated. The survey provides insight into the definition of the spatial dimension of sustainability and the determination/weighting of the case-specific component of an integrated urban sustainability assessment tool.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document