The inclusion of students with high-incidence disabilities in general education environments

2020 ◽  
pp. 46-66
Author(s):  
Brian R. Barber ◽  
Andrew L. Wiley
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
High Incidence Disabilities

Creating Content Acquisition Podcasts (CAPs) for Vocabulary

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 228-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret P. Weiss ◽  
Anya S. Evmenova ◽  
Michael J. Kennedy ◽  
Jodi M. Duke
Keyword(s):  
Instructional Design ◽  
General Education ◽  
Secondary Students ◽  
Design Principles ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Content Acquisition ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Instructional Design Principles ◽  
High Incidence Disabilities

Mastering content vocabulary is critical to the success of students with high-incidence disabilities in the general education curriculum. General education classrooms often do not offer the opportunities necessary for these students to master important vocabulary. Teachers often look to technology to help. Several studies have indicated that content acquisition podcasts (CAPs) may have an impact on the vocabulary learning of secondary students with high-incidence disabilities. In this study, 37 in-service teachers enrolled in a master’s program in special education were taught to create CAPs for vocabulary terms in a course focused on methods for secondary-level instruction. Teacher-created podcasts were assessed on the presence of Mayer’s instructional design principles as well as evidence-based practices for vocabulary instruction. Although teachers were able to include many instructional design principles related to technology in their CAPs, their use of instructional principles and evidence-based practices was inconsistent. Implications are discussed.

A Technology-Based Self-Monitoring Intervention for Secondary Students with High-Incidence Disabilities

2021 ◽  
pp. 016264342110044
Author(s):  
Skip Kumm ◽  
Elizabeth Talbott ◽  
Kristine Jolivette
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Secondary Students ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Self Monitoring ◽  
Appropriate Behavior ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
High Incidence Disabilities ◽  
Withdrawal Design

Secondary students with high incidence disabilities who also display disruptive behaviors struggle to be successful in general education settings. As a result, general education teachers are looking for ways to utilize technology to provide them with opportunities to implement evidence-based interventions in their classrooms. In this study, teachers used MoBeGo, an iPad application, in a single-case withdrawal design (ABAB), to implement self-monitoring in high school general education classrooms with four students who received special education services for a high incidence disability. The results of this study indicate that teachers could implement MoBeGo with fidelity to improve students’ academic engagement and appropriate behavior. Additionally, both the teachers and students rated MoBeGo as a socially valid intervention. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

Math Instructional Practices in General Education Classrooms With and Without Students With High-Incidence Disabilities

2019 ◽  
pp. 089590481985783
Author(s):  
Michael A. Gottfried ◽  
J. Jacob Kirksey
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Instructional Practices ◽  
Teacher Qualifications ◽  
Math Instruction ◽  
National Data ◽  
Data Set ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
High Incidence Disabilities ◽  
General Education Classrooms ◽  
Do So

This study compares mathematics instructional practices in classrooms that do and do not contain students with high-incidence disabilities (HIDs). To do so, we examined a national data set of responses from kindergarten teachers about instructional practices. We do find that in classrooms with students with HIDs, teachers reported different frequencies of math activities as well as skills instruction. These differences depended on type of HID. There were no differences in the frequency of time spent on math, meaning that classrooms with and without students with HIDs reported the same amount of math instruction per week. Differences in these findings arose based on teacher qualifications. Implications for policy are discussed.

Using Number Talks to Support Students With High-Incidence Disabilities in Mathematics

2021 ◽  
pp. 105345122110249
Author(s):  
Emily C. Bouck ◽  
Mary K. Bouck
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
General Education ◽  
Special Education Teachers ◽  
Limited Attention ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
High Incidence Disabilities ◽  
Pictorial Representations ◽  
Support Students ◽  
Number Talks

Number talks are increasingly used in general education mathematics classes to engage students. Yet, and despite the potential benefits, number talks are given limited attention for students with high-incidence disabilities in special education settings. This article presents special education teachers with both the why and, more importantly, the how for implementing number talks to support students with high-incidence disabilities in special education settings. Specifically, the authors address how number talks can serve as both a formative assessment and an intervention for fluency and activating students’ background knowledge to be successful in general education settings. The article also provides suggestions for implementing number talks with fidelity and flexibility (e.g., use of manipulatives, pictorial representations, and teacher explicit instruction of numerical strategies).

Planning Computer Science Instruction for Students With High-Incidence Disabilities

2021 ◽  
pp. 105345122110249
Author(s):  
Amy Hutchison ◽  
Anya S. Evmenova
Keyword(s):  
Computer Science ◽  
Universal Design For Learning ◽  
Computational Thinking ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Science Content ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Integration Planning ◽  
Content Area Instruction ◽  
Model Computer ◽  
High Incidence Disabilities

States increasingly are adopting computer science standards to help students develop coding and computational thinking skills. In an effort to support teachers in introducing computer science content to their students with high-incidence disabilities, a new model, computer science integration planning plus universal design for learning (CSIP+) offers ways to integrate computational thinking and coding into content area instruction. This column presents an example of how a teacher might implement the CSIP+ model when designing instruction accessible to all learners. Guiding questions to support teachers at each phase of the planning cycle are provided.

Sufficiency of Teachers’ Access to Resources and Supports for Students With Disabilities

2021 ◽  
pp. 088840642110462
Author(s):  
Samantha A. Gesel ◽  
Lindsay Foreman-Murray ◽  
Allison F. Gilmour
Keyword(s):  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
General Educators ◽  
Release Time ◽  
Service Delivery Model ◽  
Teachers Experiences ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
Using Data ◽  
High Incidence Disabilities ◽  
And Training

Students with disabilities are served by both special and general educators, yet teachers often feel unprepared to meet the needs of these students in their classrooms. Using data from a nationally representative survey, we examined the sufficiency of teachers’ access to supports available for meeting the needs of students with high-incidence disabilities, their access to development opportunities, and the sources teachers used to access interventions. We explored differences in teachers’ experiences by grade band, service delivery model, and teacher preparation model. We found teachers of students with disabilities rated the sufficiency of access to supports between somewhat insufficient and somewhat sufficient, with the lowest ratings for planning/release time and training and information. Teachers reported greater rates of access to collaboration than professional development. Colleagues were sources for resources related to academic interventions and administrators were sources for nonacademic intervention resources. There were few significant differences in these results by teacher characteristics.

scholarly journals Higher Education Faculty Staff Members' Attitudes toward Students' Inclusion with High Incidence Disabilities in Saudi Arabia

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Ameen Ali Alhaznawi ◽  
Abdullah Saleh Alanazi
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Academic Rank ◽  
Education Faculty ◽  
Higher Education Faculty ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
High Incidence Disabilities ◽  
Attitudes Toward Students

The purpose of this study is to explore the attitudes of faculty members at higher education toward inclusion for students with high incidence disabilities in higher education. For the aim of this study, a sample of 247 higher education faculty members were therefore collected. Multiple linear regression was conducted for data analysis. Results have shown that university-type accommodation services, training, academic rank, and university region are statistically significant predictors of higher education faculty members’ attitudes toward the inclusion for students with high incidence disabilities in higher education. Some recommendations are hence provided to help improve the inclusion of students with high incidence disabilities in higher education in Saudi Arabia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document