Adolescent Parenting

2019 ◽  
pp. 199-231
Author(s):  
M. Ann Easterbrooks ◽  
Rachel C. Katz ◽  
Meera Menon
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 342-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francine Jacobs ◽  
M. Ann Easterbrooks ◽  
Jessica Goldberg ◽  
Jayanthi Mistry ◽  
Erin Bumgarner ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Josefina M. Grau ◽  
Kathryn S. Wilson ◽  
Erin N. Smith ◽  
Patricia Castellanos ◽  
Petra A. Duran

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 494-503
Author(s):  
Arthur B. Elster ◽  
Elizabeth R. McAnarney ◽  
Michael E. Lamb

The results of the studies reviewed lead to the conclusion that some adolescent parents are faced with excessive stress, have an inadequate social support network, lack adequate knowledge of child development, are developmentally immature, and possess inappropriate child-rearing attitudes. The lack of rigorous, well-controlled studies, however, makes these conclusions tentative at best. Each of the socioeconomic and psychological factors listed above, in addition to innate infant characteristics, affects parental behavior. Too few studies have been done to state conclusively which of these factors have major effects on adolescent parenting. Preliminary results would suggest, however, that adolescent and adult mothers interact differently with their children. The reasons why this occurs and the significance of this difference are not presently known. Although there are conflicting results, it appears as though children of adolescent parents are at a slightly increased risk for child abuse, but not suboptimal intellectual development, when compared to children of adult mothers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Dieudonne Kayiranga ◽  
Marie Chantal Uwimana ◽  
Alice Nyirazigama ◽  
Madeleine Mukeshimana ◽  
Patricia Moreland

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Lawson ◽  
Tania Alameda-Lawson ◽  
Edward Byrnes

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the construct and predictive validity of the Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI-2). Methods: The validity of the AAPI-2 was evaluated using multiple statistical methods, including exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and latent class analysis. These analyses were conducted using data collected from a culturally diverse sample of 2,160 low-income parents. Results: Although the AAPI-2 yielded high reliability coefficients, analyses of the instrument’s validity diverged significantly from the results reported by the instrument’s developers. Specifically, the instruments’ reported five-factor structure was not supported in this study. Moreover, parents’ AAPI-2 scores were not associated with child abuse as originally hypothesized. However, when the AAPI-2 was analyzed as a categorical latent variable, the results were useful in identifying parents who were unlikely to abuse or neglect their children. Conclusion: Further replication and extension research on the AAPI-2 with other low-income populations is warranted.


1993 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 389-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Sommer ◽  
Thomas L. Whitman ◽  
John G. Borkowski ◽  
Cynthia Schellenbach ◽  
et al

2001 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Lutenbacher

The Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI) is a 32-item inventory widely used to identify adolescents and adults at risk for inadequate parenting behaviors. It includes four subscales representing the most frequent patterns associated with abusive parenting: (a) Inappropriate Expectations; (b) Lack of Empathy; (c) Parental Value of Corporal Punishment; and (d) Parent-Child Role Reversal. Although it has been used in a variety of samples, the psychometric properties of the AAPI have not been examined in low-income single mothers. The purposes of this study were to: (a) examine the reliability and validity of the Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI) in a sample of 206 low-income single mothers; (b) assess the mother’s risk for inadequate parenting by comparing their AAPI subscale scores with normative subscale scores on the AAPI; (c) assess the construct validity of the AAPI by testing the hypothesis that mothers with lower AAPI scores have a higher level of depressive symptoms and lower self-esteem in comparison to mothers with higher AAPI scores; and (d) determine whether the 4-factor structure proposed by Bavolek (1984) could be replicated. AAPI scores indicated these mothers were at high risk for child abuse when compared with normative data for parents with no known history of abuse. Higher risk for abusive parenting was associated with a higher level of depressive symptoms, less education, and unemployment. The subscales, Inappropriate Expectations and Parental Value of Corporal Punishment demonstrated poor internal consistency with Cronbach’s alphas of .40 and .54, respectively. Hypothesis testing supported the construct validity of the AAPI. Bavolek’s 4-factor structure was not supported. A 19-item modified version of the AAPI with three dimensions was identified. This modified version of the AAPI may provide a more efficacious tool for use with low-income single mothers.


1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary F. O'Callaghan ◽  
John G. Borkowski ◽  
Thomas L. Whitman ◽  
Scott E. Maxwell ◽  
Deborah Keogh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document