Stability in political unions

2018 ◽  
pp. 57-77
Author(s):  
Pablo Beramendi
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Deborah J. Brown ◽  
Calvin G. Normore

If two or more substances, distinct in essence not merely in number, can form a union, it is little wonder that collections of such composites can also form unions. The difference between the union of mind and body and social and political unions, however, is that the latter depend not upon God (directly) but upon the wills of individual humans who create them. The force behind the creation of communities is a passion, love, which Descartes defines as a willing to join oneself in union with others. As a passion, love is dependent upon the body, and as an act of will, upon the divine element within the soul. It is argued in this chapter that such unions rely on organizational and mereological principles similar to those which account for the integrity of organic bodies. It is from here that the idea of a “body politic” emerges, demonstrating the continuity of Descartes’ thinking in natural philosophy, politics, and ethics.


2000 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 1799
Author(s):  
Ian Newbould ◽  
Nancy D. Lopatin

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 651-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Tamm

This article analyzes memory politics during the first 20 years (1991-2011) of the newly independent Estonia. Memory politics is understood as a politics endeavoring to shape the society's collective memory and establish notions of what is and is not to be remembered of the past, employing to this end both legislative means and practical measures. The paper presents one possible scheme for analyzing Estonian memory politics and limits its treatment in two important ways. Firstly, the focus is on national memory politics, that is the decisions of the parliament, government, and president oriented toward shaping collective memory. And second, only internal memory politics is discussed; that is, bi- or multilateral memory-political relations with other states or political unions are not examined separately. The analysis is built on four interrelated dimensions of memory politics, which have played the most important roles in Estonia: the legal, institutional, commemorative, and monumental dimensions. Also, a general characterization and temporal articulation of memory politics in newly independent Estonia is proposed.


2002 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 661-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
MILES TAYLOR

Asian Survey ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 976-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Ramaswamy
Keyword(s):  

1970 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Per-Uno Ågren

The five Nordic countries - Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden - share a common cultural history. Four of them are closely related linguistically. Through the ages they have also been politically linked in a variety of combinations, causing both dramatic confrontations and inspiring nationalistic movements not without bearing on the museum history of the countries. The most lasting political unions were those between Denmark, Iceland and Norway (1380- 1814; Iceland stayed with Denmark until 1944) and between Finland and Sweden (1323-1809). In times of aggression from the 'outside' a loyalty between the Nordic countries based on the common history has also appeared and in the years after 1945 formal organisations have been established to promote cooperation in various fields of common interest. 


Asian Survey ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 976-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Ramaswamy
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document