John Sayles on Class Interest

2018 ◽  
pp. 111-131
Author(s):  
Andrew Light
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-192
Author(s):  
Aditya Mukherjee

This paper studies how the Indian business class, which from being among the most advanced in the world, was crushed in the colonial period and how in the colonial period itself, it made major attempts to fight back and re-establish itself. This it did by aligning with the Indian national movement and evolving a critique of imperialism. It also discusses how the business class positioned itself politically and ideologically in such a manner during the national movement and in the early years after independence that its influence over Indian society as a whole remained considerable despite a major offensive from the Left. This involved a complex enmeshing of societal interest with their long-term class interest. However, soon after the initial years of independence, the business class increasingly failed, except on a few occasions, to demonstrate a long-term view of society which would also be in their long-term interest.1


Author(s):  
David R. Shumway

John Sayles is the very paradigm of the contemporary independent filmmaker. By raising much of the funding for his films himself, Sayles functions more independently than most directors, and he has used his freedom to write and produce films with a distinctive personal style and often clearly expressed political positions. From The Return of the Secaucus Seven to Sunshine State, his films have consistently expressed progressive political positions on issues including race, gender, sexuality, class, and disability. This book examines the defining characteristic of Sayles' cinema: its realism. Positing the filmmaker as a critical realist, the book explores Sayles' attention to narrative in critically acclaimed and popular films such as Matewan, Eight Men Out, Passion Fish, and Lone Star. The study also details the conditions under which Sayles' films have been produced, distributed, and exhibited, affecting the way in which these films have been understood and appreciated. In the process, the book presents Sayles as a teacher who tells historically accurate stories that invite audiences to consider the human world they all inhabit.


1972 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 634-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Chick

In his recent article on ‘The Uganda Coup – class action by the military’ in this Journal, x, 1, May 1972, Dr Michael F. Lofchie points to two apparent paradoxes in the military takeover: Why did the army move against a regime to which it had previously been loyal? And why, in doing so, did it ally itself with the Ganda ‘civil service and coffee growing elite’ towards which it had shown nothing but hostility in the past? The only adequate explanation, we are told, is that these privileged groups were drawn together by a determination to defend their status against the threat implicit in President Obote's commitment to socialism. Confronted by egalitarian pressures they discovered a basis for common action in a class interest which transcended tribal rivalries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document