A European trial on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Author(s):  
K. Schenck-Gustafsson
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (02) ◽  
pp. 153-165
Author(s):  
François Carré

AbstractThe benefits of regular physical activity whether in primary- or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease are now irrefutable. Despite its well proven benefits, exercise training remains underused because of lack of insight and familiarity of the majority of cardiologists. This review offers cardiologists the necessary informations about the pathophysiological mechanisms, effects and limitations of the predominantly used training methods in various kardiovascular diseases.


Author(s):  
Shi Ying Tan ◽  
Heather Cronin ◽  
Stephen Byrne ◽  
Adrian O’Donovan ◽  
Antoinette Tuthill

Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. Use of aspirin has been shown to be of benefit for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes; benefits in primary prevention have not been clearly proven. Aims This study aims to (a) determine if aspirin is prescribed appropriately in type 2 diabetes for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and (b) evaluate whether there are differences in aspirin prescribing according to where people receive their care. Design Cross-sectional study Methods The medical records of individuals with type 2 diabetes aged over 18 years and attending Elmwood Primary Care Centre and Cork University Hospital Diabetes outpatient clinics (n = 400) between February and August 2017 were reviewed. Results There were 90 individuals exclusively attending primary care and 310 persons attending shared care. Overall, 49.0% (n = 196) of those were prescribed aspirin, of whom 42.3% were using it for secondary prevention. Aspirin was used significantly more in people attending shared care (p < 0.001). About 10.8% of individuals with diabetes and CVD attending shared care met guidelines for, but were not prescribed aspirin. Conclusion A significant number of people with type 2 diabetes who should have been prescribed aspirin for secondary prevention were not receiving it at the time of study assessment. In contrast, a substantial proportion who did not meet criteria for aspirin use was prescribed it for primary prevention.


Drugs & Aging ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 959-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph E. Thomas ◽  
Andrew M. Tershakovec ◽  
Charlotte Jones-Burton ◽  
Reza A. Sayeed ◽  
JoAnne M. Foody

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.T. Jorstad ◽  
Y.K. Chan ◽  
W.J.M. Scholte op Reimer ◽  
J. Doornenbal ◽  
J.G.P. Tijssen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document