Advanced Academics, Inclusive Education, and English Language Learners

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Michael S. Matthews
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca King

The purpose of this research study was to identify how assistive technologies can be used in the classroom to assist elementary students with reading disabilities. The intent of this study was targeted towards identifying and exploring the different types of available reading technologies, their benefits, as well as the potential drawbacks that they inflict. This research draws upon examining findings from various literature reviews which focused on the placement and the impacts that assistive technologies present to students with learning challenges. Additionally, interviews with experts in the fields of inclusive education, early literacy, technology, and English language learners were conducted to further these findings. A survey was sent out to inquire Mount Royal University teacher candidates, educational faculty, and various elementary school teachers regarding how they have seen technology used to assist readers. The results of this research study indicated that assistive reading technologies have the ability to propel readers to reach higher levels of success and self-efficacy, enable readers and nonreaders to engage with literature, increase comprehension, and decrease learning gaps between students. These findings are significant and useful for current and emerging facilitators as they serve to provide an awareness of reading technologies that are available and the benefits that they present to readers. However, it is essential to recognize that not every reading tool will produce the same results for every child and that assistive reading technologies should not solely be relied upon by students or teachers.


2004 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-136

04–225Burley, Suzanne, and Pomphrey, Cathy (London Metropolitan U., UK). Intercomprehension in language teacher education: a dialogue between English and Modern Languages. Language Awareness. (Clevedon, UK), 12, 3&4 (2003), 247–55.04–226Cooper, Thomas C. (U. of Georgia, USA). How foreign language teachers in Georgia evaluate their professional preparation: a call to action. Foreign Language Annals (New York, USA), 37, 1 (2004) 37–48.04–227Cruickshank, Ken, Newell, Sandra (Sydney U., Australia; Email: [email protected]) and Cole, Stephanie. Meeting English language needs in teacher education: a flexible support model for non-English speaking background students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education (Bunbury, Australia), 31, 3 (2003), 239–48.04–228Doecke, Brenton (Deakin University, Australia). Locke, Terry and Petrosky, Anthony. Explaining ourselves (to ourselves): English teachers, professional identity and change. English in Australia (Norwood, Australia), 139 (2004), 103–12.04–229Ebsworth, M. (New York U., USA). Feknous, B., Loyet, D., and Zimmerman, S. Tape it yourself: videotapes for teacher education. ELT Journal (Oxford, UK), 58, 2 (2004), 145–54.04–230Hart, Juliet E. (College of William and Mary, USA) and Lee, Okhee. Teacher professional development to improve the science and literacy achievement of English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal (Arizona, USA), 27, 3 (2003), 475–501.04–231Jewett, P. and Smith, K. (Arizona State U., USA). Becoming critical: moving toward a critical literacy pedagogy – an argument for critical literacy. Action in Teacher Education (Reston, Virginia, USA), 25, 3 (2003), 69–77.04–232Johnston, Marilyn, Bendau, Shirley, Covert, Julia, Christenson, Mary, Dyer, Jennifer, Risko, Georgene and Slutsky, Ruslan (Ohio State U., USA). Conducting action research while teaching about it. Action in Teacher Education (Reston, Virginia, USA), 25, 2 (2003), 9–15.04–233Kamler, Barbara (Deakin University, Australia) and Comber, Barbara. The new English teacher: redesigning pedagogies. English in Australia (Norwood, Australia), 139 (2004), 131–42.04–234Locke, Terry (University of Waikato, New Zealand). Reshaping classical professionalism in the aftermath of neo-liberal reform. English in Australia (Norwood, Australia), 139 (2004), 113–21.04–235Reeves, J. (Auburn University, USA). ‘Like everybody else’: equalizing educational opportunity for English language learners. TESOL Quarterly (Alexandria, Virginia, USA), 38, 1 (2004), 43–66.04–236Szesztay, M. (Eötvös Loránd U., Hungary). Teachers' ways of knowing. ELT Journal (Oxford, UK), 58, 2 (2004), 129–36.04–237Tardy, C. (Purdue University, USA) and Snyder, B. ‘That's why I do it’: flowand EFL teachers' practices. ELT Journal (Oxford, UK), 58, 2 (2004), 118–28.04–238Wanae, Gertrude M. and Kang'ethe-Kamau, Rachel W. (Kenyatta University, Kenya; Email: [email protected]). The concept of inclusive education: teacher training and acquisition of English language in the hearing impaired. British Journal of Special Education (Oxford, UK), 31, 1 (2004), 33–40.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (Spring) ◽  
pp. 115-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey Leacox ◽  
Carla Wood ◽  
Gretchen Sunderman ◽  
Christopher Schatschneider

Author(s):  
Nancy Lewis ◽  
Nancy Castilleja ◽  
Barbara J. Moore ◽  
Barbara Rodriguez

This issue describes the Assessment 360° process, which takes a panoramic approach to the language assessment process with school-age English Language Learners (ELLs). The Assessment 360° process guides clinicians to obtain information from many sources when gathering information about the child and his or her family. To illustrate the process, a bilingual fourth grade student whose native language (L1) is Spanish and who has been referred for a comprehensive language evaluation is presented. This case study features the assessment issues typically encountered by speech-language pathologists and introduces assessment through a panoramic lens. Recommendations specific to the case study are presented along with clinical implications for assessment practices with culturally and linguistically diverse student populations.


Author(s):  
Vera Joanna Burton ◽  
Betsy Wendt

An increasingly large number of children receiving education in the United States public school system do not speak English as their first language. As educators adjust to the changing educational demographics, speech-language pathologists will be called on with increasing frequency to address concerns regarding language difference and language disorders. This paper illustrates the pre-referral assessment-to-intervention processes and products designed by one school team to meet the unique needs of English Language Learners (ELL).


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-79
Author(s):  
Sara C. Steele ◽  
Deborah A. Hwa-Froelich

Nonword repetition performance has been shown to differentiate monolingual English-speaking children with language impairment (LI) from typically developing children. These tasks have been administered to monolingual speakers of different languages and to simultaneous and sequential bilingual English Language Learners (ELLs) with mixed results. This article includes a review of the nonword repetition performance of monolingual and bilingual speakers and of internationally adopted children. Clinical implications for administration and interpretation of nonword repetition task outcomes are included.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (16) ◽  
pp. 15-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henriette W. Langdon ◽  
Terry Irvine Saenz

The number of English Language Learners (ELL) is increasing in all regions of the United States. Although the majority (71%) speak Spanish as their first language, the other 29% may speak one of as many as 100 or more different languages. In spite of an increasing number of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who can provide bilingual services, the likelihood of a match between a given student's primary language and an SLP's is rather minimal. The second best option is to work with a trained language interpreter in the student's language. However, very frequently, this interpreter may be bilingual but not trained to do the job.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document