Signposting disadvantage – social exclusion in Hong Kong

Author(s):  
Peter Saunders ◽  
Hung Wong ◽  
Wo Ping Wong
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maggie Lau ◽  
David Gordon ◽  
Christina Pantazis ◽  
Eileen Sutton ◽  
Lea Lai

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (01n02) ◽  
pp. 47-66
Author(s):  
PILAR VALENZUELA-SILVA ◽  
MONIT CHEUNG

With a focus on research conducted after Hong Kong reunited with China in 1997, this paper documents how the Nepalese immigrants living in Hong Kong processed their decision to either stay in Hong Kong or return to their home country. A review of 40 studies targeting Nepalese immigrants who chose to stay in Hong Kong found that these families were primarily influenced by: 1) their immigration history, including their roles as Gurkhas in the Hong Kong military and their contributions to the local labor force, and 2) their quality of living in Hong Kong versus Nepal. Among these 40 studies, only seven offered statistics with direct input from Nepalese research participants. Their responses show that the three different generations of Nepalese living in Hong Kong, while contributing to the cultural richness in Hong Kong, have experienced profound social exclusion. This article seeks to compile research findings to define issues facing Nepalese in Hong Kong and offers suggested solutions to the question: How can social workers help Nepalese in Hong Kong obtain economic and educational opportunities to enhance their quality of life? Implications for further research and social service interventions are explored with attention to social inclusion and promoting higher education opportunities.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 547-561
Author(s):  
Ruby C. M. Chau ◽  
Sam W. K. Yu ◽  
Kathy Boxall

This article contributes to the search for suitable approaches to combat social exclusion faced by disabled people in capitalist wage labour markets. Referring to policy and service examples in Hong Kong, it reviews four social exclusion approaches – the Moral Underclass (MUD), Social Integrationist (SID), Redistributive (RED) and Collective Production (COP) approaches. These approaches are explored in relation to three key issues: (1) the diverse preferences of disabled people; (2) the myth of infeasibility regarding unconventional approaches and (3) the defects of the medical model of disability. The article argues that the MUD and SID approaches are more associated with the medical model of disability and emphasise individual changes. The RED and COP approaches contain more features of the social model of disability and are in favour of social and structural changes. The COP approach stresses the diverse preferences of disabled people and supports innovative services to combat social exclusion.


2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 503-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes Yeung ◽  
Ruby C.M. Chau ◽  
Sam W.K. Yu

This article is based on two studies conducted in Guangzhou and Hong Kong. It argues that many managerial women in these two Chinese cities rely mainly on an individual approach to reduce their social exclusion and simultaneously use implicit actions to challenge structural inadequacies in the family and the work place.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document