A visual defect in dyslexics?

2017 ◽  
pp. 137-156
Author(s):  
J.F. Stein
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Yuk L. Tsang ◽  
Alex VanVianen ◽  
Xiang D. Wang ◽  
N. David Theodore

Abstract In this paper, we report a device model that has successfully described the characteristics of an anomalous CMOS NFET and led to the identification of a non-visual defect. The model was based on detailed electrical characterization of a transistor exhibiting a threshold voltage (Vt) of about 120mv lower than normal and also exhibiting source to drain leakage. Using a simple graphical simulation, we predicted that the anomalous device was a transistor in parallel with a resistor. It was proposed that the resistor was due to a counter doping defect. This was confirmed using Scanning Capacitance Microscopy (SCM). The dopant defect was shown by TEM imaging to be caused by a crystalline silicon dislocation.


Author(s):  
Yuk L. Tsang ◽  
Xiang D. Wang ◽  
Reyhan Ricklefs ◽  
Jason Goertz

Abstract In this paper, we report a transistor model that has successfully led to the identification of a non visual defect. This model was based on detailed electrical characterization of a MOS NFET exhibiting a threshold voltage (Vt) of just about 40mv lower than normal. This small Vt delta was based on standard graphical extrapolation method in the usual linear Id-Vg plots. We observed, using a semilog plot, two slopes in the Id-Vg curves with Vt delta magnified significantly in the subthreshold region. The two slopes were attributed to two transistors in parallel with different Vts. We further found that one of the parallel transistors had short channel effect due to a punch-through mechanism. It was proposed and ultimately confirmed the cause was due to a dopant defect using scanning capacitance microscopy (SCM) technique.


1999 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 182
Author(s):  
Sean P. Cunningham ◽  
Scott MacKinnon

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Sauter ◽  
Cem Atik ◽  
Christian Schenk ◽  
Ricardo Buettner ◽  
Hermann Baumgartl

Author(s):  
C. A. Boye ◽  
C. J. Penny ◽  
J. Connors ◽  
D. Boyles ◽  
C. Janicki ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Martins da Silva Costa ◽  
Antonio Carlos Santos ◽  
Laudo Silva Costa

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jesús Pareja ◽  
Alba Coronado ◽  
Inés Contreras

Purpose. To report the results of the epiretinal membrane (ERM) management guidelines followed in our center. Methods. Patients with ERM seen between 2014 and 2015, with ≥2 years follow-up or who had undergone ERM surgery, were included. Corrected visual acuity (VA), lens status, and ERM configuration were recorded at each visit. Our guidelines for ERM are if VA is ≥20/30, observation is recommended unless there is moderate/intense metamorphopsia. Vitrectomy is recommended during follow-up if there is a drop >one line in VA with changes in ERM configuration. If VA at diagnosis is <20/30, vitrectomy is recommended. If visual loss is thought to be due to cataract, phacoemulsification is performed first and visual status reevaluated. Results. Ninety-nine eyes of 94 patients were included; 52 eyes underwent vitrectomy, and 47 eyes were monitored. From eyes with VA at diagnosis <20/30 (41 eyes), 8 eyes underwent isolated phacoemulsification: VA improved to ≥20/30. Vitrectomy was recommended but refused by 4 patients. The other 29 eyes underwent vitrectomy. Of the 58 eyes with VA at diagnosis ≥20/30, 5 underwent surgery due to metamorphopsia. Eighteen eyes underwent vitrectomy during follow-up. VA improved a mean of 0.13 logMAR (SD 0.30) after vitrectomy. There were no differences in mean VA improvement between eyes that underwent vitrectomy within six months of diagnosis (0.24, SD 0.32) and those that underwent surgery more than six months after diagnosis (mean 0.17, SD 0.17), p=0.106. Three eyes developed postsurgical complications with visual loss: persistent macular edema in one eye, two consecutive retinal detachments in one eye, and a central visual defect in another eye. At the end of follow-up, VA was similar in the observation group (0.14, SD 0.14) and in the vitrectomy group (0.16, SD 0.28), p=0.528. Conclusions. Our proposed guidelines lead to visual preservation in most patients while limiting surgery and its possible complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document