Contingency Theory of Organizations—Differentiation and Integration:

2015 ◽  
pp. 244-270
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Moon-Kyo SEO ◽  
◽  
Myeong-Cheol CHOI ◽  


1996 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoud Yasai-Ardekani ◽  
Paul C. Nystrom


2021 ◽  
pp. 031289622110095
Author(s):  
Syaiful Ali ◽  
Peter Green ◽  
Alastair Robb ◽  
Adi Masli

Using contingency theory, we argue that there is not a uniform approach for companies to govern information technology (IT) investments. Rather, the level of governance over IT investments is contingent upon the organization’s goals for its IT investments. We find that Australian organizations with both operation- and market-focused IT investment goals (i.e. dual-focused IT goals) demonstrate higher IT investment governance (ITIG) levels than those with less focused IT goals. We also document that dual-IT-focused firms that do not implement high levels of ITIG underperform. Our study informs business executives, boards of directors, and other practitioners interested in governance implementations over IT investments. JEL Classification: M1



Author(s):  
Peter Ellis

This article identifies leadership as a key responsibility of all nurses, including those working in cardiovascular care—whether they are in a leadership role or whether they have to exercise it in their practice. It identifies that, contrary to early theories, leadership knowledge and skills may be taught and learned. It identifies the core definitions of leadership as being influenced by the person, result, position, purpose or process. It goes on to discuss two key approaches to leadership that suit modern nursing practice: contingency theory and transformational leadership. These approaches are demonstrated as pertinent to modern nursing practice because they focus on the development of people and the team, and require emotional intelligence.





2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Marinus van Zelst ◽  
Remco Mannak ◽  
Leon Oerlemans

We meta-analyze the influence of various forms of embeddedness and proximity on interorganizational tie formation with a dataset that encompasses 256,529 ties from 73 studies. First, we uncover the unparalleled importance of relational embeddedness, while the influence of structural and positional embeddedness turns out to be highly dependent on the context. Second, we show that various forms of proximity positively influence tie formation and have unique explanatory power in addition to the embeddedness dimensions. Last, we explore to what extent these effects are contingent on the type of tie, resource munificence, status orientation, level of individuality, and intellectual property regimes. Our study introduces a preliminary contingency theory of interorganizational tie formation and provides directions for future research.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document