Social Constructionist Inquiry in Family Therapy with Chinese Americans

Author(s):  
Shi-Jiuan Wu ◽  
Linda E Enders ◽  
Mary Anna Domokos-Cheng Ham
1997 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-Jiuan Wu ◽  
Linda E. Enders ◽  
Mary Anna Domokos-Cheng Ham

2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arlene Vetere

Structural Family Therapy was developed by Salvador Minuchin and colleagues during the 1960s as part of the growing interest in systemic ways of conceptualising human distress and relationship dilemmas, and in working therapeutically with those natural systems and relationships, thought to give rise to distress. Structural family therapy is underpinned by a clearly articulated model of family functioning, and has been developed and used most consistently in services for children and families. A growing body of empirical evidence attests to the efficacy of structural family therapy. As an approach it was extensively critiqued during the 1980s by feminist writers and during the 1990s by those interested in the implications of a social constructionist position. Structural family therapy continues to evolve in response to challenges mounted from within and outwith the systemic field, and as part of integrative practice and multi-systemic approaches, with practitioners ever mindful of the need for regular feedback from family members themselves.


Author(s):  
Sara Honn Qualls ◽  
Lacey Edwards

Family systems therapy seeks to alter the structure or processes of a family for the purposes of reducing distress in one or more persons and improving the ability of the family to meet members’ needs. Building from a general systems paradigm, family systems therapy recognizes that family structures shift over time as they respond to members’ developmental processes and broader system demands. As members enter and exit or change capacity, and as external stressors arise, the family typically uses adaptive processes to demonstrate resilience. Family systems therapy is useful when the family struggles to adapt, or the adaptation strategy further stresses the family. Multiple models of family systems therapies offer variations in intervention approaches but have common tenets. Major models include Ackerman’s early psychodynamics model, transgenerational models of family therapy, structural family therapy, strategic family therapy, and communications approaches to family therapy. Models vary in their recommended roles for the therapist, strategies for therapist and family, and the salience of immediate versus longer-term goals. Family systems therapies conceptualize family interactions as complex, reciprocal, open, self-organizing, adaptive, social constructionist, and meaning-making. Family systems therapy also can be used with systems larger than families, such as schools or organizations, or to understand cultural phenomena. The field of marriage and family therapy has defined competencies for practice, training requirements, and licensure standards and established national and international professional organizations.


1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Storm King ◽  
Susan Engi ◽  
Stephan Poulos
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian J. Bachmann ◽  
Gerd Lehmkuhl ◽  
Franz Petermann ◽  
Stephen Scott

Bei der Behandlung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit aggressivem Verhalten ist in den vergangenen Jahren vor allem im englischsprachigen Ausland ein Trend zum Einsatz evidenzbasierter psychotherapeutischer Interventionen zu verzeichnen. In diesem Beitrag werden–getrennt für Kindes- und Jugendalter–die am besten evaluierten Therapieprogramme (u. a. Multisystemic Therapy, Functional Family Therapy, The Incredible Years) für diese Indikation dargestellt. Es werden aktuelle Fragen der Implementation und Disseminierung evidenzbasierter Interventionen für aggressive Kinder und Jugendliche diskutiert (z. B. Qualitätssicherung, Therapietreue). Abschließend werden Perspektiven für eine Implementation evidenzbasierter Interventionen in Deutschland aufgezeigt.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adele Lafrance ◽  
Katherine A. Henderson ◽  
Shari Mayman

2001 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Kameguchi ◽  
Stephen Murphy-Shigematsu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document