Sports governance

2019 ◽  
pp. 14-49
Author(s):  
Jason Haynes ◽  
J. Tyrone Marcus
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Henne ◽  
Madeleine Pape

Most research on global sports policy either negates or underappreciate perspectives from the Global South. This article incorporates Southern Theory to examine how Northern worldviews profoundly shape gender-specific sports policy. It highlights two dilemmas that emerge, using illustrative case studies. First, it considers questions of gender and regulation, as evidenced in the gender verification regimes of track-and-field. Then, it addresses the limits of gender and empowerment in relation to sport for development and peace initiatives’ engagement with the diverse experiences and perspectives in non-Western contexts, considering them in relation to programming for women in Pacific Island countries. The article concludes with a reflection on possible contributions of Southern theory to sport sociological scholarship.


2020 ◽  
pp. 39-73
Author(s):  
Sean Ennis
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 35-45
Author(s):  
Vilma Čingienė ◽  
Mindaugas Gobikas

This article aims to analyse the process of formation of sports public policy in Lithuania within the theoretical context of hierarchy governance. This study consisted of collection and analysis of official documents regarding sports public policy formation from 2011 until 2018. The data collection was aimed at uncovering of key components of the process of public policy formation – environmental analysis, strategic planning, competence and decision making power, and stakeholders. The main findings of the research concluded that Lithuanian sports governance, along with the majority of other European countries, is defined as bureaucratic configuration. The main responsibility within the process of sports public policy formation falls on the Ministry of Education, Science and Sports and active national non-government sports organisations, while principal objectives of the Lithuanian sports public policy formation are laid out in strategic documents. However, the implementation needs to be centred on institutional and personal responsibility, proper environmental regard and tolerance, and the ability to listen and to reach an agreement.


2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Sejer Andersen

Artiklen omhandler sportsverdens problemer, at lukke op for kritik og debat. Jens Sejer Andersen: Dangerous wordsDue to lack of credible internal and external control mechanisms sport is vulnerable to organised crime and individual corruption. International sports organisations often react with threats and intimidation towards those who openly raise critical sports governance issues. The federations often settle in countries that are reluctant to monitor their business practices, and on the inside the sports organisations are marked by a family culture that seeks to suppress conflicts rather than debating and solving them in open democratic procedures. It is necessary to create networks across professional and geographical boundaries in order to help sport find solutions to its inherent governance problems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document