The local usages of Europe in social cohesion policies: a comparative analysis

Author(s):  
Serida L. Catalano ◽  
Paolo R. Graziano
2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-38
Author(s):  
MAËLINE LE LAY

International aid has influenced and, in part, shaped the artistic sector in Africa's Great Lakes region (DRC, Rwanda, Burundi) since the 1990s, a period marked by numerous conflicts and mass violence. Due to NGOs’ programmatic foci, artists performing for social change are increasingly compelled to focus on reconciliation and conflict resolution, generating political awareness and bringing about social change, healing and peacemaking. Through a comparative analysis of European and local productions on the genocide this article asks, how and why does an ‘NGO-style theatre’ develop a specific audience in the region? How have themes such as mass violence, inter-ethnic conflict and social cohesion become the main concerns of the territory's theatre? How do performances made and/or sponsored by NGOs challenge not only theatre's form, its social stakes and functions, but also the conception of its audience and the relationships between actors and spectators?


2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loris Vergolini

This article explores the relationship between social cohesion and social inequalities in Europe. The analysis is built around two main research questions: Does economic inequality exert an impact on the level of social cohesion? Does social class mediate between economic inequality and social cohesion? The comparative analysis is based on the welfare regimes perspective. In particular, I believe that welfare state is relevant because it influences both the relationship between social class and economic inequality, and the link between social cohesion and economic inequality. The empirical analysis, based on data from the “European Quality of Life Survey” collected by European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions in 2003, shows that economic inequality does influence social cohesion and that social class and welfare regime are not fully able to mediate this effect.


2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feuzullah Yetgin ◽  
Natalija Lepkova

The housing sector is a very important sector in the national economy worldwide. The greater importance of the housing sector is broadly defined, to include financing, upgrading, repairs, management, valuation, taxation and population. The article presents a comparative analysis on housing policies in Turkey and Lithuania. The housing strategies ‐their differences and similarities – of Turkey and Lithuania are presented in the article. Strategic principles and preferences of housing are analysed in the countries under investigation. Some economic aspects are underlined. The policies of social housing of investigated countries are presented. The housing problems of both analysed countries are described. Special attention is paid to sustainable housing and social cohesion in housing. Būsto politikos Turkijoje ir Lietuvoje lyginamoji analizė Santrauka Busto sektorius yra labai svarbus sektorius visame pasaulyje. Didele įtaka busto sektoriui turi finansavimas, remontai, valdymas, vertinimas, mokesčiai, gyventoju skaičius. Straipsnyje atliekama būsto politikos Turkijoje ir Lietuvoje lyginamoji analize, pateikiami Turkijos ir Lietuvos būsto strategijų bendri bruožai ir skirtumai, analizuojami strategijų principai ir prioritetai. Analizuojama gyventoju skaičiaus įtaka būsto sektoriui. Akcentuojami tam tikri ekonominiai aspektai. Ištirta ir pateikta socialinio būsto politika nagrinėjamose šalyse. Pateikiamos būsto problemos dviejose analizuojamose šalyse. Atskiras dėmesys nukreiptas į subalansuota būstą ir socialine sanglauda būsto srityje, taip pat apžvelgta būsto nuomos rinka bei susijusios problemos. Pateikiama Turkijos ir Lietuvos SSGG analize.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document