scholarly journals Seismic anisotropy: an original tool to understand the geodynamic evolution of the Italian peninsula

1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Margheriti ◽  
C. Nostro ◽  
A. Amato ◽  
M. Cocco
Keyword(s):  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Common Property ◽  
Seismic Waves ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Relative Strength ◽  
Plate Motion ◽  
Mantle Minerals ◽  
Anisotropic Bodies ◽  
Shallow Crust

Anisotropy is a common property of the Earth's crust and the upper mantle; it is related to the strain field of the medium and therefore to geodynamics. In this paper we describe the different possible origins of anisotropic behavior of the seismic waves and the seismological techniques used to define anisotropic bodies. In general it is found that the fast polarization direction is parallel to the absolute plate motion in cratonic areas, to the spreading direction near rifts or extensional zones, and to the main structural features in transpressive regimes. The delay times between fast and slow waves reflect the relative strength and penetration at depth of the deformation field. The correspondence between surface structural trends and anisotropy in the upper mantle, found in many regions of the world, strongly suggest that orogenic processes involve not only the shallow crust but the entire lithosphere. Recently in Italy both shear wave splitting analysis and Pn inversion were applied to define the trend of seismic anisotropy. Along the Northern Appeninic arc fast directions follow the strike of the arc (i.e., parallel to the strike of the Miocene-Pleistocene compressional features), whereas in the Tyrrhenian zone fast directions are about E-W SW-NE; parallel to the post-Miocene extension that is thought to have reoriented the mantle minerals fabric in the astenosphere.

Seismic anisotropy and mantle deformation in NW Iran through splitting measurements of SKS and direct S phases

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiva Arvin ◽  
Farhad Sobouti ◽  
Keith Priestley ◽  
Abdolreza Ghods ◽  
Seyed Khalil Motaghi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Field ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Central Iran ◽  
Plate Motion ◽  
Propagation Path ◽  
Mantle Flow ◽  
South Caspian Basin ◽  
Nw Iran ◽  
S Waves

<p><span>The present tectonics of Iran has resulted from the continental convergence of the Arabian and Eurasian plates. Our study area, in NW Iran comprises a part of this collision zone and consists of an assemblage of distinct lithospheric blocks including the central Iranian Plateau, the South Caspian Basin, and the Talesh western Alborz Mountains. A proper knowledge of mantle flow field is required to bettwer constrain mantle kinematics in relation to the dynamics of continental deformation in NW Iran. To achieve this aim, we examined splitting of teleseismic shear waves (e.g. SKS and S) arriving with steep arrival angles beneath the receiver, which provide excellent lateral resolution in the upper mantle. We used data from 68 temporary broadband stations with varying operation periods (4 to 31 months) along 3 linear profiles. We perfomed splitting analyses on SK(K)S and direct S waves. </span>Resultant splitting parameters obtained from both shear phases exhibit broad similarities. Relatively large time delays observed for direct S-waves, however, are anticipated since these waves travel longer than SKS along a non-vertical propagation path in an anisotropic layer. Overall, the fast polarization directions (FPDs) in the Alborz, Talesh, Tarom Mountain and in NW Iran indicate a strong consistency with NE-SW anisotropic orientations. Besides, we observe a good accordance between S and SKS results. A comparison of splitting parameters with the absolute plate motion (APM) vector and structural trends in Iran and eastern Turkey suggests asthenospheric flow field as the dominant source for observed seismic anisotropy. The lithospheric layer beneath these regions is relatively thin (compared to the adjacent Zagros region), explaining why it appears to only make a partial contribution to the observed anisotropy. The stations located in central Iran just southwest of the Alborz yield angular deviations from the general NE-SW trend as this may be explained by changing style of deformation across the different tectonic blocks. These stations indicate significant misfit between SK(K)S and direct S-waves that could be caused by local heterogeneities developed due to a diffuse boundary from the flow organization in the upper mantle of central Iran. Another possibility for large differences between two types of waves might be reflect the anisotropic structure of a remnant slab segment or a foundered lithospheric root beneath central Iran with a volume small enough to be detected by SKS phases, but not by the direct S waves.</p>

scholarly journals Upper Mantle Anisotropy beneath the Western Segment, NW Indian Himalaya, Using Shear Wave Splitting

Lithosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shubhasmita Biswal ◽  
Sushil Kumar ◽  
Sunil K. Roy ◽  
M. Ravi Kumar ◽  
W. K. Mohanty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Western Himalaya ◽  
Shear Wave Splitting ◽  
Plate Motion ◽  
Indian Plate ◽  
Deformation Pattern ◽  
Mantle Flow ◽  
Wave Splitting

Abstract This study investigates the upper mantle deformation pattern beneath the Indo-Eurasia collision zone utilizing the core-refracted (S(K)KS) phases from 167 earthquakes recorded by 20 broadband seismic stations deployed in the Western Himalaya. The 76 new shear wave splitting measurements reveal that the fast polarization azimuths (FPAs) are mainly oriented in the ENE-WSW direction, with the delay times varying between 0.2 and 1.7 s. The FPAs at most of the stations tend to be orthogonal to the major geological boundaries in the Western Himalaya. The average trend of the FPAs at each station indicates that the seismic anisotropy is primarily caused due to strain-induced deformation in the top ~200 km of the upper mantle as a result of the ongoing Indo-Eurasian collision. A contribution from the mantle flow in the direction of the Indian plate motion is possible. The mantle strain revealed in the present study may be due to a combination of basal shear resulting from plate motion and ductile flow along the collision front due to compression.

scholarly journals Melt movement through the Icelandic crust

2019 ◽  
Vol 377 (2139) ◽  
pp. 20180010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. White ◽  
Marie Edmonds ◽  
John Maclennan ◽  
Tim Greenfield ◽  
Thorbjorg Agustsdottir
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Time Scales ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
High Strain ◽  
Strain Rates ◽  
Complementary Information ◽  
Reservoir Architecture ◽  
Rift Zones ◽  
Shallow Crust ◽  
Basaltic Melts

We use both seismology and geobarometry to investigate the movement of melt through the volcanic crust of Iceland. We have captured melt in the act of moving within or through a series of sills ranging from the upper mantle to the shallow crust by the clusters of small earthquakes it produces as it forces its way upward. The melt is injected not just beneath the central volcanoes, but also at discrete locations along the rift zones and above the centre of the underlying mantle plume. We suggest that the high strain rates required to produce seismicity at depths of 10–25 km in a normally ductile part of the Icelandic crust are linked to the exsolution of carbon dioxide from the basaltic melts. The seismicity and geobarometry provide complementary information on the way that the melt moves through the crust, stalling and fractionating, and often freezing in one or more melt lenses on its way upwards: the seismicity shows what is happening instantaneously today, while the geobarometry gives constraints averaged over longer time scales on the depths of residence in the crust of melts prior to their eruption. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue ‘Magma reservoir architecture and dynamics'.

scholarly journals Large-scale variation in seismic anisotropy in the crust and upper mantle beneath Anatolia, Turkey

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cédric P. Legendre ◽  
Li Zhao ◽  
Tai-Lin Tseng
Keyword(s):  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Crust And Upper Mantle ◽  
Wave Splitting ◽  
Mantle Processes ◽  
Open Question ◽  
Subduction System ◽  
Anisotropic Phase ◽  
Regional Tectonics

AbstractThe average anisotropy beneath Anatolia is very strong and is well constrained by shear-wave splitting measurements. However, the vertical layering of anisotropy and the contribution of each layer to the overall pattern is still an open question. Here, we construct anisotropic phase-velocity maps of fundamental-mode Rayleigh waves for the Anatolia region using ambient noise seismology and records from several regional seismic stations. We find that the anisotropy patterns in the crust, lithosphere and asthenosphere beneath Anatolia have limited amplitudes and are generally consistent with regional tectonics and mantle processes dominated by the collision between Eurasia and Arabia and the Aegean/Anatolian subduction system. The anisotropy of these layers in the crust and upper mantle are, however, not consistent with the strong average anisotropy measured in this area. We therefore suggest that the main contribution to overall anisotropy likely originates from a deep and highly anisotropic region round the mantle transition zone.

Seismic anisotropy of the crust and upper mantle beneath western Tibet revealed by shear wave splitting measurements

2018 ◽  
Vol 216 (1) ◽  
pp. 535-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changhui Ju ◽  
Junmeng Zhao ◽  
Ning Huang ◽  
Qiang Xu ◽  
Hongbing Liu
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Shear Wave Splitting ◽  
Crust And Upper Mantle ◽  
Wave Splitting

scholarly journals Supplemental Material: Seismic anisotropy in southern Costa Rica confirms upper mantle flow from the Pacific to the Caribbean

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vadim Levin ◽  
et al.
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Costa Rica ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Mantle Flow ◽  
Analysis Methodology ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Wave Splitting ◽  
The Caribbean

Data sources, details of data analysis methodology, and additional diagrams and maps of shear wave splitting measurements.<br>

No signal of a plume push force in Indo-Atlantic plate speeds before, during, or after Deccan plume arrival

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graeme Eagles ◽  
Lucía Pérez Díaz ◽  
Karin Sigloch
Keyword(s):  
Late Cretaceous ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Plate Boundary ◽  
Plate Motion ◽  
Driving Mechanism ◽  
African Plate ◽  
Plate Motions ◽  
Driving Mechanisms ◽  
High Resolution Models ◽  
Spreading Rates

&lt;p&gt;Observations of the apparent links between plate speeds and the global distribution of plate boundary types have led to the suggestion that subduction may provide the largest component in the balance of torques maintaining plate motions. This would imply that plate speeds should not exceed the sinking rates of slabs into the upper mantle. Instances of this &amp;#8216;speed limit&amp;#8217; having been broken may thus hint at the existence of driving mechanisms additional to those resulting from plate boundary forces. The arrival and emplacement of the Deccan-R&amp;#233;union mantle plume beneath the Indian-African plate boundary in the 67-62 Ma period has been discussed in terms of one such additional driving mechanism, leading to the establishment of &amp;#8220;plume-push&amp;#8221; hypothesis, which in recent years has gained significant traction. We challenge the model-based observations that form the principal evidence in favour of plume-push: a late Cretaceous pulse of anticorrelating accelerations and decelerations in seafloor spreading rates around the African and Indian plates. Using existing and newly-calculated high-resolution models of plate motion, we instead document an increase in divergence rates at 67-64 Ma. Because of its ubiquity, we consider this increase to be the artefact of a timescale error affecting chrons 29-28. Corrected for this artefact, the evolution of plate speeds resembles a smooth continuation of pre-existing late Cretaceous trends, consistent with the idea that the arrival of the R&amp;#233;union plume did not substantially affect the existing balance of plate boundary forces on the Indian and African plates.&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document