POINTING OUT THE NEED FOR TIMELY SUBMISSION OF THE PROPOSAL FOR OPENING THE BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verica Danilova
Keyword(s):  
2000 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung‐Jen Wang ◽  
Michelle J. White

Author(s):  
V. A. Mozharova ◽  
◽  
T. M. Lavrik ◽  

Bankruptcy refers to the procedure for declaring an individual or legal entity financially insolvent. To launch this procedure, it is necessary to fulfill clearly regulated conditions concerning the volume of debt obligations, the duration of their default and the insufficiency of assets for the full repayment of creditors' claims. The analysis of the grounds for starting the bankruptcy procedure associated with the mortgage lending procedure is presented.


2020 ◽  
pp. 259-264
Author(s):  
В. В. Дутка

The relevance of the article is that society’s attitude to the bankruptcy procedure is ambiguous: ordinary citizens who have never been involved in bankruptcy proceedings often perceive it as a certain negative phenomenon that should be avoided and avoided. On the other hand, for many debtors, bankruptcy becomes the “lifeline” with which they can repay their claims to creditors and start financial life “from scratch”. At the same time, it should be noted that many debtors and creditors use the bankruptcy procedure not for the purposes provided by the legislator in the relevant legal norms, but to satisfy only their own interests, to the detriment of the interests of other parties to the case. In this regard, the study of the abuse of the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings becomes relevant. The article is devoted to the study of abuse of the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings. The purpose of the article is to study the abuse of the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings and highlight the author’s vision of this issue. According to the results of the study, the author concludes that the application to the debtor of bankruptcy procedures can be both good for the debtor and to the detriment of the interests of his creditors. Entities that could potentially abuse the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings are: creditors of the debtor – a legal entity, as well as debtors – legal entities, individuals and individuals – entrepreneurs. The fact of exemption of debtors from the court fee for filing an application to initiate bankruptcy proceedings is not only an unjustified luxury for our state, but also only contributes to the abuse of the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings by unscrupulous debtors. In order to reduce the number of cases of abuse of the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings, the author justifies the need to complicate the conditions for opening bankruptcy proceedings, for example, by returning the conditions provided by the Law of Ukraine “On Restoration of Debtor’s Solvency or Recognition of Debtor’s Bankruptcy”.


Author(s):  
Aleksandra Višekruna

Opening of bankruptcy procedure causes numerous consequences that affect the debtor in insolvency and all the persons connected with it. Since employees have the strongest bond with their employer - debtor, special treatment is given to the effect of insolvency on labor contracts. Faith of these contracts in bankruptcy procedure depends upon many factors, but nowadays in majority of countries commencement of bankruptcy does not necessarily mean automatic termination of employment. Since Serbian law has known, during the course of history, both approaches, in this paper we have addressed both of them, and we have pointed out numerous dilemmas that had risen due to imprecise norms. The current Law has accepted more modern concept and sees bankruptcy as a reason for dismissal. However, the Law has not resolved numerous issues that give rise to different interpretations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Pawel Dec ◽  
Piotr Masiukiewicz

This paper focuses on the analysis of comparative models bankruptcy in selected EU countries and the evaluation of the effectiveness of the insolvency proceedings. These models are quite similar in the countries concerned; also they give the opportunity to the many variants of the bankruptcy procedure. The main thesis of the article is—so far developed and applied models of bankruptcy are still insufficient and need to be improved and reorientation to a greater extent, particularly concerning the taking into account of weak signals from the business environment. The authors analyzed the relevant theories of the firm and its reference to bankruptcy, presented various models of insolvency procedures in selected EU member states, analyzed the so-called European Company for bankruptcy. Complementing the paper detailed research on the effectiveness of insolvency proceedings in many countries. Included in the text of the conclusions show the shortage of both in theory and in practice, a comprehensive solution to the problem of insolvency proceedings.


Author(s):  
J. Scott Slorach ◽  
Jason Ellis

The partner or sole trader may be made bankrupt if his liabilities exceed his assets or if he has insufficient liquid assets to pay his current liabilities even if the value of his total assets exceeds the value of his total liabilities. The law of bankruptcy is mostly contained in the Enterprise Act (EA) 2002. This chapter discusses the bankruptcy procedure; the trustee in bankruptcy; effect of the bankruptcy order on the bankrupt personally; assets in the bankrupt’s estate; distribution of the bankrupt’s assets; duration of the bankruptcy and discharge of the bankrupt; fast track voluntary arrangement scheme; and individual voluntary arrangement.


Author(s):  
J. Scott Slorach ◽  
Jason Ellis

The partner or sole trader may be made bankrupt if his liabilities exceed his assets or if he has insufficient liquid assets to pay his current liabilities even if the value of his total assets exceeds the value of his total liabilities. The law of bankruptcy is mostly contained in the Enterprise Act (EA) 2002. This chapter discusses the bankruptcy procedure; the trustee in bankruptcy; effect of the bankruptcy order on the bankrupt personally; assets in the bankrupt’s estate; distribution of the bankrupt’s assets; duration of the bankruptcy and discharge of the bankrupt; fast track voluntary arrangement scheme; and individual voluntary arrangement.


Author(s):  
M A Clarke ◽  
R J A Hooley ◽  
R J C Munday ◽  
L S Sealy ◽  
A M Tettenborn ◽  
...  

All books in this flagship series contain carefully selected substantial extracts from key cases, legislation, and academic debate, providing able students with a stand-alone resource. This new edition includes discussion of new legislation, including: Consumer Rights Act 2015; Insurance Act 2015; Modern Slavery Act 2015; Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015; Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010; Bribery Act 2010; Payment Services Regulations 2009. The text also has analysis of the latest developments in case law, including: Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd and Devani v Republic of Kenya (on personal property law); Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc (on vicarious liability); Kelly v Fraser and Thanakharn Kasikorn Thai Chamkat (Mahachon) v Akai Holdings Ltd (on apparent authority); Sinclair Investments (UK) Ltd v Versailles Trade Finance Ltd and European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC (on agent's secret profits); Bailey v Angove's Pty Ltd (on irrevocable agencies); Cukurova Finance International v Alfa Telecom Turkey Ltd, Gray v G-T-P Group Ltd, and USA v Nolan (on the Financial Collateral Arrangements, No 2, Regulations). The book contains a new introductory section on the impact of Brexit on English commercial law. Insolvency coverage includes discussion of new out-of-court bankruptcy procedure, debt relief orders, and pre-pack administrations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document