In this paper, we prove a theorem on the existence of solutions for a second
order differential inclusion governed by the Clarke subdifferential of a
Lipschitzian function and by a mixed semicontinuous perturbation.
In this paper, we study the existence of solutions for a system of quadratic
integral equations of Chandrasekhar type by applying fixed point theorem of
a 2 x 2 block operator matrix defined on a nonempty bounded closed convex
subsets of Banach algebras where the entries are nonlinear operators.
AbstractWe prove existence of solutions and its properties for a one-dimensional stochastic partial differential equations with fractional Laplacian and non-Lipschitz coefficients. The method of proof is eatablished by Kolmogorov’s continuity theorem and tightness arguments.
This study deals with the development of an accurate, efficient and robust method for the numerical solution of the interaction of compressible flow and nonlinear dynamic elasticity. This problem requires the reliable solution of flow in time-dependent domains and the solution of deformations of elastic bodies formed by several materials with complicated geometry depending on time. In this paper, the fluid–structure interaction (FSI) problem is solved numerically by the space-time discontinuous Galerkin method (STDGM). In the case of compressible flow, we use the compressible Navier–Stokes equations formulated by the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) method. The elasticity problem uses the non-stationary formulation of the dynamic system using the St. Venant–Kirchhoff and neo-Hookean models. The STDGM for the nonlinear elasticity is tested on the Hron–Turek benchmark. The main novelty of the study is the numerical simulation of the nonlinear vocal fold vibrations excited by the compressible airflow coming from the trachea to the simplified model of the vocal tract. The computations show that the nonlinear elasticity model of the vocal folds is needed in order to obtain substantially higher accuracy of the computed vocal folds deformation than for the linear elasticity model. Moreover, the numerical simulations showed that the differences between the two considered nonlinear material models are very small.