Analytical Review of Judicial Cases Considered with the Participation of Antimonopoly Bodies

2021 ◽  
pp. 106-109
Author(s):  
L. V. Vovkivskay ◽  
E. V. Savostina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
High Price ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Antitrust Laws ◽  
Analytical Review

The review provides an analysis of the legal positions of arbitration courts in cases of violations of antitrust laws committed by abuse of a dominant position, setting a monopolistically high price, and entering into anticompetitive agreements between bidders and customers; claims of the antimonopoly authority; practice reducing the size of the administrative fine for violations of antitrust laws.Purpose: the formation of uniform approaches in law enforcement practice in cases of violation of antitrust laws.

Analytical review of judicial cases considered with the participation of antimonopoly bodies

2020 ◽  
pp. 102-105
Author(s):  
L. V. Vovkivskay ◽  
E. V. Savostina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
High Price ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Antitrust Laws ◽  
Analytical Review

The review provides an analysis of the legal positions of arbitration courts in cases of violations of antitrust laws committed by abuse of a dominant position, setting a monopolistically high price, and entering into anticompetitive agreements between bidders and customers; claims of the antimonopoly authority; practice reducing the size of the administrative fine for violations of antitrust laws.Purpose: the formation of uniform approaches in law enforcement practice in cases of violation of antitrust laws.

Analytical review of judicial cases considered with the participation of an antimonopoly body

2020 ◽  
pp. 92-95
Author(s):  
L. V. Vovkivskaya ◽  
E. V. Savostina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Economic Entity ◽  
Antitrust Laws ◽  
Antimonopoly Law ◽  
Analytical Review

The review contains an analysis of the legal positions of the arbitration courts in cases of violation of the antimonopoly legislation regarding the consideration of the following issues: an order of the antimonopoly body on transferring to the budget the income received as a result of violation of the antimonopoly law; non-payment of services received under the contract as an abuse of a dominant position; trust agreement as a condition for the admissibility of an anti-competitive agreement; claims of the antimonopoly body on forcing an economic entity to comply with the instructions of this body.Purpose: the formation of uniform approaches in law enforcement practice in cases of violation of antitrust laws.

scholarly journals Analytical review of antitrust judicial practice (second half of 2019)

2019 ◽  
pp. 74-77
Author(s):  
L. V. Vovkivskaya ◽  
E. V. Savostina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Antitrust Laws ◽  
Analytical Review ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The review contains an analysis of the legal positions of the arbitration courts of the Russian Federation in cases of violation of the antimonopoly legislation regarding the consideration of the following issues: the primacy of antimonopoly control in relation to entities holding a dominant position; creation by the customer of unequal conditions for the participation of persons in procurement; inaction of the authority, leading to restriction of competition; creating benefits for a particular business entity during the procurement; repetition when brought to administrative responsibility. The purpose of the analytical review is the formation of uniform approaches in law enforcement practice in cases of violation of antitrust laws.

Analytical review of judicial cases involving antitrust body

2021 ◽  
pp. 90-93
Author(s):  
L. V. Vovkivskaya ◽  
E. V. Savostina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Economic Entity ◽  
Antitrust Laws ◽  
Analytical Review ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

Analysis of the arbitration court’s legal positions in cases of violation of antimonopoly legislation on the following issues: limitation period for the institution of administrative proceedings for merger deals, determining the dominant position of an economic entity, court actions against, Antimonopoly service warnings, administrative fines reductions, ways of proving anti-competitive agreements. Purpose: the formation of uniform approaches in law enforcement practice in cases of violation of antitrust laws.

Analytical Review of Court Cases Considered with the Participation of Antimonopoly Authorities

2022 ◽  
pp. 88-92
Author(s):  
L. V. Vovkivskaya ◽  
E. V. Savostina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Court Cases ◽  
Antitrust Laws ◽  
State Preference ◽  
Analytical Review ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

Analysis of the legal positions of arbitration courts in cases of violation of antimonopoly legislation regarding the consideration of issues: the statute of limitations for bringing to administrative responsibility, the grounds for refusing to provide state preference, the consideration of complaints about the actions of bidders/operators carried out during the mandatory procedures applied in the bankruptcy case.Objective: to develop uniform approaches in law enforcement practice in cases of violation of antitrust laws.

scholarly journals Legal means of antimonopoly regulation of entrepreneurial activity. Responsibility for violation of antitrust laws.

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
Vladislav Belyay
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Entrepreneurial Activity ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Antitrust Laws ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The aim of this legal research is to analyze the legal means of antimonopoly regulation of entrepreneurial activity. In the course of the study, it was possible to find a number of problems in the use of legal means of antimonopoly regulation of entrepreneurial activity, as well as in the area of bringing to administrative responsibility for violation of antimonopoly legislation. To solve the above problems, the author suggests: 1. For a more effective fight against the abuse of a dominant position, it is necessary to apply tools of risk-oriented control 2. Create a mechanism for coordinating the actions of law enforcement agencies and antimonopoly authorities to identify the most dangerous offenses in the field of antimonopoly regulation. 3. Create a separate procedure for legal regulation of bringing to administrative responsibility for violation of antimonopoly legislation, separating these norms from the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation into the current law on the protection of competition.

Review of judicial cases involving the competition authority

2021 ◽  
pp. 102-106
Author(s):  
L. V. Vovkivskaya ◽  
E. V. Savostina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Foreign Investor ◽  
Competition Authority ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Antitrust Laws ◽  
Abuse Of Dominant Position ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

Analysis of the legal positions of arbitration courts in cases of violation of antitrust laws in terms of consideration of issues: exceptions to the patent monopoly, approaches to proving anticompetitive agreements, establishing the fact of being under the control of a foreign investor, abuse of dominant position, bringing to administrative responsibility in the absence of representatives of the person involved. Target: developing uniform approaches in law enforcement practice in cases of violation of antitrust laws.

Review of Judicial Cases Involving the Competition Authority

2021 ◽  
pp. 88-91
Author(s):  
L. V. Vovkivskaya ◽  
E. V. Savostina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Competition Authority ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Economic Entity ◽  
Antitrust Laws

Analysis of the legal positions of arbitration courts in cases of violation of antimonopoly laws in terms of consideration of issues: determination of the dominant position of an economic entity, abuse by regulated organizations, abuse of regional operators in the treatment of MSW, approaches to proving anticompetitive agreements.  Target. Development of uniform approaches in law enforcement practice in cases of violation of antitrust laws.

The Practice of Courts in Administrative Cases Arising from Control and Supervisory Relations in the Field of Antimonopoly Control (Analytical Review)

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 75-91
Author(s):  
К. А. Pisenkо ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Analytical Review ◽  
Economic Concentration ◽  
Supervisory Relations

This review based on a scientific and practical study of the practice of courts in cases arising from the control of economic concentration, focuses on the current problems of law enforcement in the implementation of antimonopoly control and supervision activities and offers directions and approaches to improving law enforcement practice.

Chimera of domestic antitrust: Institute of collective dominance in Russia

2021 ◽  
pp. 68-88
Author(s):  
A. E. Shastitko ◽  
K. A. Ionkina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Market Analysis ◽  
Legal Norm ◽  
Economic Regulation ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Oligopoly Theory ◽  
Russian Version ◽  
Competition Law Enforcement ◽  
Abuse Of Dominant Position ◽  
Collective Dominance

The paper defines the features of the collective dominance institute in Russia as well as the relation between collective dominance and oligopoly in the spheres of law and economic theory. The article evaluates the grounds and consequences of the collective dominance legal norm application; it suggests an approach to examining the relation between effects and expected results of this legal norm application and outlines the potential ways to harmonize the best international practices of the collective dominance norm application with the existing economic standards of product market analysis for the purpose of competition law enforcement. Results of the oligopoly theory and the Russian version of collective dominance institution key elements comparison show: the collective dominance institution concept is inadequately applied to identify individual abuse of dominant position due to possible law enforcement errors. The Russian version of collective dominance institution reflects one fundamental tendency intrinsic to Russian antitrust: examined more closely, law enforcement, which is de jure aimed at protecting competition, appears to be economic regulation, which de facto can lead to competition restriction. One of the possible structural alternatives for the collective dominance institution reforming is based on presumption of the need to analyze the joint impact exerted by a group of undertakings on the market.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document