scholarly journals Legal means of antimonopoly regulation of entrepreneurial activity. Responsibility for violation of antitrust laws.

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
Vladislav Belyay
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Entrepreneurial Activity ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Antitrust Laws ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The aim of this legal research is to analyze the legal means of antimonopoly regulation of entrepreneurial activity. In the course of the study, it was possible to find a number of problems in the use of legal means of antimonopoly regulation of entrepreneurial activity, as well as in the area of bringing to administrative responsibility for violation of antimonopoly legislation. To solve the above problems, the author suggests: 1. For a more effective fight against the abuse of a dominant position, it is necessary to apply tools of risk-oriented control 2. Create a mechanism for coordinating the actions of law enforcement agencies and antimonopoly authorities to identify the most dangerous offenses in the field of antimonopoly regulation. 3. Create a separate procedure for legal regulation of bringing to administrative responsibility for violation of antimonopoly legislation, separating these norms from the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation into the current law on the protection of competition.

scholarly journals Administrative Responsibility as a Means of Protection of Patent (Inventor’s) Rights in the Russian Federation: Some Issues of Legal Regulation

Lex Russica ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 9-17
Author(s):  
N. A. Kulakov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Patent Rights ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The purpose of the research paper is to study the problems of legal regulation of administrative liability in the field of patent law. As a result of the conducted research, the author comes to the conclusion that administrative responsibility as a means of legal protection of patent rights possesses significant potential capacity. However, a number of factors do not allow this potential to be enforced to the necessary extent. The author enumerates the following factors: latency of administrative offenses in the field of the patent legislation and lack of confidence of rights’ holders in law enforcement agencies in this area; low level of legal qualification of law enforcement officials in the field of the patent legislation; problems of the normative and legal regulation of administrative liability for infringement of patent rights. The author sees the solution to the problem of increasing the efficiency of administrative responsibility in the field of the patent legislation as a complex counteraction to the above factors. Within the framework of the paper special attention is paid to the problems of legal regulation of administrative liability in the field of patent legislation. The author analyzes Para 2 of Art. 7.12 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, which provides for liability for violation of patent and inventor’s rights. The author comes to the conclusion about the need to develop this legal rule and defines a number of proposals for amending the current legislation. In addition, in order to ensure a comprehensive and effective protection of the right to remuneration for an invention (utility model, industrial design), a proposal has been formulated to expand the jurisdiction of the federal labor inspectorate and introduce the consequential amendments to the secondary legislation.

scholarly journals Analytical review of antitrust judicial practice (second half of 2019)

2019 ◽  
pp. 74-77
Author(s):  
L. V. Vovkivskaya ◽  
E. V. Savostina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Antitrust Laws ◽  
Analytical Review ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The review contains an analysis of the legal positions of the arbitration courts of the Russian Federation in cases of violation of the antimonopoly legislation regarding the consideration of the following issues: the primacy of antimonopoly control in relation to entities holding a dominant position; creation by the customer of unequal conditions for the participation of persons in procurement; inaction of the authority, leading to restriction of competition; creating benefits for a particular business entity during the procurement; repetition when brought to administrative responsibility. The purpose of the analytical review is the formation of uniform approaches in law enforcement practice in cases of violation of antitrust laws.

Systematization and improvement legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence in law enforcement

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-112
Author(s):  
Vadim K. Barchukov
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Information Support ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Effective Work ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article systematizes legal acts at the international, Federal and departmental levels on the use of artificial intelligence in law enforcement. In particular, at the international level, the corresponding legal act, according to the author, should contain three components of legal regulation: 1) regulate the organization and construction of an artificial intelligence system between States; 2) determine the principles of functioning of artificial intelligence; 3) regulate the ethical issues of using artificial intelligence. The legal basis for the use of artificial intelligence systems in law enforcement at the Federal level, in addition to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, should be the Strategy for the development of the information society in the Russian Federation (Strategy) for 2017-2030, as well as some special Federal laws (for example, the Law of Moscow), which are designed to specify the mechanism for using the advantages of artificial intelligence in all spheres of public life, including law enforcement. The author notes that the mentioned strategy defines only the General provisions of the state policy on the development of information technologies and artificial intelligence technologies. At the same time, the implementation of national interests outlined in the Strategy is impossible without the effective work of law enforcement agencies, whose functioning, in turn, is impossible without a well-built system of interaction between information support and artificial intelligence. The final part of the paper presents some proposals for improving the legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence in law enforcement, in particular, justifies the need to adopt a national Doctrine for the use of a Unified system of information support and artificial intelligence in the activities of law enforcement agencies.

On the criteria for defining the concept and the state of legal regulation for the civil service of other types in the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 6-12
Author(s):  
ALEXANDER GURINOVICH ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Service ◽  
Special Functions ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Fire Service ◽  
Federal State ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Current State ◽  
The Russian Federation

This article analyzes the relevant legislation, identifies the basic criteria for defining the concept of the civil service of other types in the Russian Federation, and describes the current state of its legal regulation. The service of other types is carried out in the federal-state bodies and organizations subordinate to them; such organizations perform special functions to ensure security, law and order, combat crime and protect citizens’ rights and freedoms. The author identifies the reasons for the abolition of such a concept as “law enforcement service” in the civil service systems and considers the process of its transformation into a new segment within this system. Based on the conducted comparative analysis of legislative and subordinate legal acts containing relevant regulatory provisions, the analysis shows that today the civil service of other types is carried out in state bodies defined as law enforcement agencies. To reflect the current state of legal regulation for the civil service of other types, the author notes an increase in the corresponding legislative framework in recent years. The issues of legal regulation of work in the field of civil service of other types are worked out in special laws regarding employees of customs authorities, internal affairs bodies, the federal fire service, the criminal justice system, and enforcement bodies. In addition, the article outlines the key priorities for further improvement of legal regulation.

scholarly journals Current problems of the institute of extradition in modern criminal proceedings Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
pp. 126-135
Author(s):  
S. V. Matveev ◽  
S. M. Kolotova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
International Cooperation ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
Legislative Framework ◽  
The Russian Federation

The Institute of extradition is one of the most important areas of international cooperation in the fight against crime, since this tool ensures the achievement of the fundamental principles of the criminal process, which include: the restoration of the rights of the victim violated by the crime, the application of fair punishment to the criminal, despite the differences in the legal regulation of this issue in the jurisdiction of different States. However, should the legal regulation currently, this institution does not have, and therefore the activities of law enforcement agencies in this part cause certain difficulties.The article analyzes some features of the legal regulation of the institution of extradition in the criminal process of the Russian Federation, identifies current problems of theory and practice of application. In addition, the author suggests ways to solve the problems of legal regulation of this institution. Attention is focused on the need to make changes not only to the legislative framework, but also to modernize the extradition mechanism itself. In addition, the current issues that arise in the course of the extradition procedure, both at the request of the Russian Federation and foreign States, are considered. 

State service of the Russian Federation in the sphere of law enforcement: problems of theory and practice of administrative and legal regulation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Роман Нагорных ◽  
Roman Nagornyh
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Russian Federation

The monograph presents the characteristics of modern theoretical and methodological approaches to the understanding of the problems of administrative and legal regulation of the public service of the Russian Federation in the field of law enforcement, subjected to a detailed analysis of the current administrative legislation in the field of administrative and legal regulation and organization of public service in law enforcement agencies, justified the direction of further improvement Special attention is paid to the problems of development of the administrative law Institute of public service in law enforcement, the legal status of civil servants of law enforcement agencies in our country. The book is intended for students, postgraduates, teachers and researchers of educational institutions and research institutions, as well as for all those interested in the problems of modern administrative law.

scholarly journals Foreign trade entrepreneurial activity in modern Russian case law

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Evgenii Alekseevich Shatunov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Foreign Trade ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Theoretical Research ◽  
Entrepreneurial Activity ◽  
Trade Relations ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
The Russian Federation

In the era of globalization, international trade relations are an integral part of the economy of majority of the countries, including the Russian Federation. Increase of the role of entrepreneurship in the sphere of foreign trade entails escalated disputes. This article reviews the theoretical aspects of law enforcement practice on the disputes associated with foreign trade entrepreneurial activity. Analysis is conducted on legal regulation of foreign trade entrepreneurial activity, as well as Russian case law in the corresponding sphere, namely disputes considered in arbitration court, and theoretical research on the matter. Methodological framework is comprised of the general scientific and private scientific methods of cognition (dialectical, analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, comparative-legal, and historical-legal). The author concludes on the lack of uniformity in the approaches used by arbitration courts towards determining the law applicable to transboundary agreements. The creation of uniform case law on the controversial issues requires taking into account the existing law enforcement practice, as well as unifying them based on accumulated experience. For example, in the Russian Federation this process could be facilitated through corresponding clarifications on the level of resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation with explanations on the key contentious issues pertaining to the disputes in foreign trade entrepreneurial activity. The presented materials can be used in further consideration of disputes in the sphere of foreign trade entrepreneurship, as well as in providing explanations of law enforcement practice.

scholarly journals Legal Regulation of the Activities of Operational Units of Law Enforcement Agencies in Maritime Spaces

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 174-183
Author(s):  
L. V. Mikhaylova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
International Cooperation ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
National Legislation ◽  
Legal Regimes ◽  
The Russian Federation

The paper deals with the problems of control over crime in the sea, contradictions and gaps in regulations that determine the procedure for considering reports of crimes, conducting operational-search measures when committing criminal acts outside the Russian Federation. The existing legal regimes in the sea do not take into account the specifics of operational search activities and, therefore, are not applicable for detecting, suppressing and solving crimes, as well as making decisions on received messages and statements. The author formulates recommendations for law enforcement officers, as well as makes proposals for improving international tools and departmental regulations aimed at solving the problem associated with ensuring compliance with the rules of law in the sea. It is important to note that the improvement and expansion of law enforcement capabilities can be achieved through the adoption of effective measures that combine the introduction of relevant provisions into national legislation, as well as international cooperation of many states.

scholarly journals Imposition of cumulative administrative penalty: technical-legal defects and law enforcement problems in the sphere of forest conservation

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Anna Viktorovna Korepina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Simplified Approach ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Administrative Penalty ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The subject of this research is the social relations arising in the context of application of administrative sanctions for violating forestry legislation. The object of this research is the legislation on administrative offenses of the Russian Federation and foreign countries, law enforcement and judicial practice. The author observes the ambiguity of application of legislation on administrative offences by the state forestry departments in some constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Therefore, this scientific article indicates one of the relevant issues that stir up disputes among the law enforcement agencies – imposition of cumulative administrative penalty for violating forestry legislation. Using the universal dialectical, descriptive, and hermeneutical methods, the author analyzes the current administrative legal norms that regulate the procedure for imposition of cumulative administrative penalty. Special attention is given to the factors of ambiguity in law enforcement practice in terms of imposition of cumulative administrative penalty, which has developed due to the flaws in legal writing: 1) the absence of conceptual scientific developments dedicated to imposition of administrative penalty for cumulative administrative offenses; 2) simplified approach towards legal regulation of certain institutions of administrative responsibility that generates gaps in the legislation on administrative responsibility, which must filled in by law enforcement practice; 3) inappropriate interpretation of norms of the Article 4.4. of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences by the law enforcement, and namely, judicial bodies. The scientific novelty consists in recommendations for improving the provisions of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses in this sphere. The conclusions are based on the formal-legal and logical methods of research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document