Lectura crítica del sistema extrajurisdiccional de resolución del conflicto de consumo en la Unión Europea que prevén la Directiva 2013/11/UE y el Reglamento UE 524/2013

2014 ◽  
pp. 2259-2277
Author(s):  
Ixusko ORDEÑANA GEZURAGA
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Resolution System ◽  
Main Components ◽  
Dispute Resolution System ◽  
Made In

LABURPENA: Europar Batasunean kontsumo-gatazkak konpontzeko jurisdikziotik kanpoko sistemaren osagai nagusiak deskribatu ondoren, sistema horren azterketa kritikoa egiten da lan honetan (hauek dira sistema horren araubidearen osagaiak: 2013/11/UE Zuzentaraua eta UE 524/2013 Erregelamendua). Horretarako, jurisdikziotik kanpoko mekanismoen berezko helburua kalitatea eta eraginkortasuna direla abiapuntu hartuta, haien elementuei buruzko arauak aztertzen dira, antolamendu berriari dagokionean. RESUMEN: Tras describir sus componentes principales, el estudio realiza un análisis crítico del sistema extrajurisdiccional de resolución del conflicto de consumo en la Unión Europea configurado por la Directiva 2013/11/UE y por el Reglamento UE 524/2013. Para ello, partiendo de que los mecanismos extrajurisdiccionales persiguen de por sí la calidad y la eficacia, se analiza la regulación de sus distintos elementos en la nueva ordenación. ABSTRACT: After describing its main components, a critical analysis on extrajurisdictional consumer dispute resolution system in the European Union provided by Directive 2013/11/UE and Regulation EU 524/2013 is made. In order to achieve this aim, assuming that extra-jurisdictional mechanisms themselves pursue quality and efficiency, their different elements are analyzed in the new regulation.

scholarly journals The evolution of alternative dispute resolution and online dispute resolution in the European Un

CES Derecho ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-17
Author(s):  
Shamaise Peters
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Trust ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Online Dispute Resolution ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Resolution System ◽  
Dispute Resolution System ◽  
The Eu

The evolution of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) as an augmentation from Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) may lead to an authentic paradigm shift in the way disputes are handled beyond the traditional court systems. To assess state of the art and convey awareness, this paper explores the regulatory landscape of the European Union (EU) using the United Kingdom and Estonia to illustrate the key advancements and shortcomings of the supranational strategy. It discusses the relationships between ADR capabilities and its productive use in ODR, the ODR deployment and adoption, and the consequences that may arise if dispute resolution technologies leapfrog. The paper also speaks of automation and suggests the need to build integrative models into Artificial Intelligence (AI) - powered ODR platforms. It is apparent that the early challenges in the development of the ADR culture in the EU are still unresolved, affecting the proper integration of ADR principles and ODR technologies. A more effective coupling could be expected to smooth digital trade interactions by increasing access to justice and consumer trust in the redress capacities of the Dispute Resolution System (DRS) as a whole. 

scholarly journals Dispute Resolution Practices in USA, Australia and UK/EU

2019 ◽  
Vol IV (I) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abida Hassan ◽  
Dil Muhammad Malik
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Informal Justice ◽  
Resolution System ◽  
European Union Countries ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
Formal Justice ◽  
Dispute Resolution System

The research aims to highlight and discuss the different modes of settlement of disputes in today�s populated and overcrowded societies. The research has shown that due to expensive, time consuming and rigid process of formal justice system (court litigation) USA, Australia, UK and even European Union countries have preferred informal justice system (Alternative Dispute Resolution) for disputants to opt for their solutions. The informal dispute resolution system (Alternative Dispute Resolution) prevailing in modern countries like USA, Australia and UK is full of benefits and most probably the main reason for their progress and development also, and the study has shown that the system is working successfully in these countries, therefore, it can be applied anywhere even in the developing countries as well because this system is more sustainable in any form than the formal justice system (court litigation).

Les héritages chrétiens: quel avenir?

Moreana ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (Number 176) (1) ◽  
pp. 175-190
Author(s):  
Bernard Bourdin
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Middle Ages ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Religious Affiliation ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Modern Times ◽  
The Past ◽  
Religious Significance ◽  
Politics And Religion

The legacy from Christianity unquestionably lies at the root of Europe, even if not exclusively. It has taken many aspects from the Middle Ages to modern times. If the Christian heritage is diversely understood and accepted within the European Union, the reason is essentially due to its political and religious significance. However, its impact in politics and religion has often been far from negative, if we will consider what secular societies have derived from Christianity: human rights, for example, and a religious affiliation which has been part and parcel of national identity. The Christian legacy has to be acknowledged through a critical analysis which does not deny the truth of the past but should support a European project built around common values.

Designing an Effective Dispute Resolution System

1988 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Ury ◽  
Jeanne M. Brett ◽  
Stephen B. Goldberg
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Resolution System ◽  
Dispute Resolution System

Staatsklimahaftung

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabell Böhm
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
European Union ◽  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Eu Member States ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
State Liability ◽  
Liability Claims ◽  
The Eu ◽  
Made In

Climate change litigation is becoming increasingly important. This thesis deals with the question whether state liability claims against Germany or the EU can be justified, if commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are not met. For this purpose, the claim under public liability according to § 839 German Civil Code in connection with Art. 34 German Basic Law, the liability of the EU-Member States and the liability of the European Union according to Art. 340 II TFEU are discussed. At the end of the thesis, considerations on the practical perspectives of state liability are made in order to improve their prospects of success.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document