scholarly journals Getting to know you: Student-faculty interaction and student engagement in online courses

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Symonds Morrison
Keyword(s):  
Student Engagement ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Student Interaction ◽  
Faculty Interaction ◽  
Instructor Presence ◽  
Brick And Mortar ◽  
Barriers And Challenges ◽  
Online Format

Covid-19 presented many challenges to universities around the world as brick-and-mortar courses were moved to an online format. This work is an unofficial study of faculty-student interaction and student engagement in 7-week online graduate-level courses conducted in Spring 2020, Fall 2020, and early Spring 2021.  Research shows that instructor presence in online courses leads to increased student engagement, as well as motivation, well-being, and academic achievement.  Student engagement is shown to have a direct impact on a student’s emotional, behavioral, and cognitive successes. This work proposes that increased faculty-student interaction in online courses using a variety of strategies would lead to greater student engagement with the course, and in the end, greater student success in overcoming barriers and challenges to online learning.  

scholarly journals Structural Relationship of Key Factors for Student Satisfaction and Achievement in Asynchronous Online Learning

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 6734
Author(s):  
Sohee Kim ◽  
Dae-Jin Kim
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Student Engagement ◽  
Student Satisfaction ◽  
Survey Data ◽  
Structural Model ◽  
Student Interaction ◽  
Structural Relationship ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
Course Structure ◽  
Instructor Presence

This study examines the structural relationship among key factors influencing student satisfaction and achievement in online learning. A structural model was developed by considering course structure, student–student interaction, instructor presence, student engagement, student satisfaction and achievement as key factors. In order to verify the effectiveness of the developed structural model, we utilized the survey data collected from a total of 250 students enrolled in two asynchronous online courses offered at Kyung Hee University in Korea in the fall semester of 2020. Then, the collected survey data were analyzed using the structural equation model. The verification of the statistical analysis results indicates that the course structure has a more significant effect on the student satisfaction and achievement than the other key factors such as the student–student interaction, instructor presence and student engagement. It also reveals that the student engagement affects only the student satisfaction and has a mediated effect between student–student interaction and student satisfaction.

Trifecta of Student Engagement

2021 ◽  
pp. 96-118
Author(s):  
Heather J. Leslie
Keyword(s):  
Student Engagement ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Student Interaction ◽  
Digital Tools ◽  
Online Course ◽  
Curriculum Content ◽  
Instructor Interaction ◽  
Content Interaction ◽  
Student Instructor

This chapter describes a framework adapted from Michael Moore's three essential areas: student-content interaction, student-student interaction, and student-instructor interaction for engaging students in online courses. To be fully engaged in an online course, students need to be engaged with the course curriculum content, with their peers, and with their instructor. When students are engaged in all three areas, it is referred to as the Trifecta of Student Engagement. This chapter incorporates literature on each area of the Trifecta of Student Engagement: student-to-content engagement, student-to-student engagement, and student-to-instructor engagement as well as some suggested synchronous and asynchronous digital tools.

Trifecta of Student Engagement

2020 ◽  
pp. 77-106
Author(s):  
Heather J. Leslie
Keyword(s):  
Student Engagement ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Student Interaction ◽  
Digital Tools ◽  
Online Course ◽  
Curriculum Content ◽  
Instructor Interaction ◽  
Content Interaction ◽  
Student Instructor

This chapter describes a framework adapted from Michael Moore's three essential areas: student-content interaction, student-student interaction, and student-instructor interaction for engaging students in online courses. To be fully engaged in an online course, students need to be engaged with the course curriculum content, with their peers, and with their instructor. When students are engaged in all three areas, it is referred to as the Trifecta of Student Engagement. This chapter incorporates literature on each area of the Trifecta of Student Engagement: student-to-content engagement, student-to-student engagement, and student-to-instructor engagement as well as some suggested synchronous and asynchronous digital tools.

scholarly journals Student engagement with course content and peers in synchronous online courses discussions

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison M Truhlar ◽  
Kimberly M Williams ◽  
M Todd Walter
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
United States ◽  
Student Engagement ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Student Interaction ◽  
Interaction Type ◽  
Student Interactions ◽  
Course Content ◽  
The Third

As higher education institutions in United States offer online courses to growing audiences, there is increasing desire to understand how best to engage students with both course content and their peers. This case study examines the effects of assigning chat roles and facilitating self and group reflection on student-content and student-student interaction outcomes in four synchronous chats conducted in an online introductory-level sustainability course. We also considered what occurred within group reflections to inform how they are structured in the future. We found that assigning roles increased the proportion of critical student-student interactions. Self-reflections had no effect on either interaction type. Groups completing group reflections had a greater proportion of critical student-content interactions in the third chat and critical student-student interactions in the fourth chat than the groups that did not complete the group reflections. Based on our results, we plan to keep roles and group reflections going forward, and eliminate self-reflections. Furthermore, to increase the effectiveness of the group reflections, we propose some ideas to increase student ability to convert their ideas into change during subsequent chats.

Assessing the Relationship between Learner Satisfaction and Faculty Participation in Online Course Discussions

2011 ◽  
pp. 27-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana Offerman ◽  
Kimberly Pearce ◽  
Tassava Christopher
Keyword(s):  
Online Courses ◽  
Student Interaction ◽  
Learner Satisfaction ◽  
Faculty Participation ◽  
Learner Engagement ◽  
Course Content ◽  
Faculty Interaction ◽  
Faculty Behaviors ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Professional Value

Faculty-student interaction in online courses heightens student satisfaction and success. Capella University studied the relationship between learner satisfaction with faculty (as reported in end-of-course evaluations) and faculty participation in online courses (as measured by monitoring faculty interaction). Learners appear to be more responsive in courses led by instructors who seem committed to learner success and dedicated to improving learner engagement with the subject matter and other learners. Some instructor behaviors, including certain messages and eedback on assignments, improved overall learner satisfaction. However, these faculty behaviors did not improve other learner perceptions, such as increased professional value. Instructor-learner interaction with respect to projects and course content may be more important to learner satisfaction and realization of professional value than other kinds of faculty-student interaction.

scholarly journals Do High-Achieving Students Benefit From Honors College Participation? A Look at Student Engagement for First-Year Students and Seniors

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angie L. Miller ◽  
Amber D. Dumford
Keyword(s):  
Student Engagement ◽  
General Education ◽  
First Year ◽  
Integrative Learning ◽  
Education Students ◽  
First Year Students ◽  
General Education Students ◽  
Honors College ◽  
Faculty Interaction ◽  
College Participation

This study investigates findings from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), comparing various aspects of student engagement between honors college and general education students. Responses from 1,339 honors college students and 7,191 general education students across 15 different universities suggest a positive impact for honors college participation on reflective and integrative learning, use of learning strategies, collaborative learning, diverse discussions, student–faculty interaction, and quality of interactions for first-year students, even when controlling for student and institutional characteristics. For senior students, honors college participation was related to more frequent student–faculty interaction. Potential experiential and curricular reasons for these differences are discussed, along with implications for educators, researchers, parents, and students.

Teacher Data Analysis and Assets-Based Discourses about Multilingual Youth: Exploration of Relationships

2020 ◽  
Vol 122 (11) ◽  
pp. 1-42
Author(s):  
Daniella Molle
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Student Engagement ◽  
Classroom Practice ◽  
Data Use ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Multilingual Students ◽  
Study Approach ◽  
Mediational Role ◽  
Teacher Data ◽  
Over Time

Context The pervasiveness of deficit-based discourses about multilingual students has long been documented in the scholarly literature. Such discourses severely erode the learning and well-being of multilingual youth. One of the spaces in which deficit-based discourses about students may be transformed is professional development. Focus of the Study The study connects a key practice of high-quality professional development, the analysis of classroom evidence of student learning, to student-focused discourses about multilingual youth. The research questions the study addresses are: As they make sense of data together, (a) how do teachers discursively position multilingual youth? and (b) what factors reinforce and undermine assets-based discourses about multilingual youth? Research Design Leveraging a case study approach, I explore how a team of three middle-school teachers positions students while analyzing classroom evidence during a one-year professional development designed for educators of multilingual youth. I rely primarily on transcripts of professional development sessions to trace student positioning by the team over time as teachers analyze dissimilar types of classroom evidence. Findings The findings reveal complex mediational relationships among teachers’ data use, student positioning, and shared theories of student engagement. These co-constructed theories reinforce deficit views of students when student reasoning and participation in learning are obscured by the data teachers are exploring. When the data make the process of student engagement available for reflection, however, teachers shift toward assets-based discourses. In addition, the findings shed light on relationships between type of evidence and implications for classroom practice. The teachers in the study shift their focus from teacher-centered instruction to the scaffolding of student interaction when the data make visible student participation in learning. Conclusions The study contributes to a nascent knowledge base about the complex relationships between teacher analysis of classroom evidence and assets-based discourses about all students and multilingual students in particular. The findings expand current conceptualizations of teacher data use by foregrounding student positioning over time as a key element of teacher sensemaking, and revealing the significant mediational role that shared theories of student engagement play in teachers’ data use. In terms of practical implications, the study offers insights into the mechanisms through which assets-based discourses about multilingual youth can be fostered across learning contexts.

Differences of instructor presence levels in predominately online versus predominately not online courses within the community college setting

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Marcie M. Cutsinger
Keyword(s):  
Community Of Inquiry ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Online Course ◽  
University Of Missouri ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Learning Modalities ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Instructor Presence ◽  
Community Of Inquiry Framework ◽  
The Impact

[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] The purpose of this study was to gain insight into the level of instructor presence in the predominately online versus the predominately not online course. The increase in both the number of students enrolling on online courses and the number of courses/programs offered magnifies the need to address instructor presence. This case study considers students' perception of instructor presence in a predominately online and predominately not online course. Instructor presence was examined using the Community of Inquiry framework. The Community of Inquiry is a framework used to examine social, teaching and cognitive presence and the impact of such. Data was gathered from two courses in the different learning modalities. Students were enrolled in the courses at the same time with the same instructor. Statistical analysis utilized in this study included the Mann Whitney U, Spearman's rho and Kendall tau. A significance level of P less than (.05) was used for all tests. This research found no statistically significant difference in the levels of instructor presence in a predominately online course when compared to a predominately not online course. The two significant results in relation to instructor presence and course satisfaction were mixed. Course outcome and instructor presence are addressed with discussion and recommendations for further research included. This study contributes to the research by providing further data regarding students' perception of and the significance of instructor presence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document