Comparative study between activated sludge versus membrane bioreactor for textile wastewater

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 101-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salazar Lorena ◽  
Crespi Martì ◽  
Salazar Roberto
Author(s):  
Mary Vermi Aizza Corpuz ◽  
Laura Borea ◽  
Vincenzo Senatore ◽  
Fabiano Castrogiovanni ◽  
Antonio Buonerba ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 105276
Author(s):  
Choerudin Choerudin ◽  
Fauziyah Istiqomah Arrahmah ◽  
Jonatan Kevin Daniel ◽  
Takahiro Watari ◽  
Takashi Yamaguchi ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 733-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Sahar ◽  
M. Ernst ◽  
M. Godehardt ◽  
A. Hein ◽  
J. Herr ◽  
...  

The potential of membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems to remove organic micropollutants was investigated at different scales, operational conditions, and locations. The effluent quality of the MBR system was compared with that of a plant combining conventional activated sludge (CAS) followed by ultrafiltration (UF). The MBR and CAS-UF systems were operated and tested in parallel. An MBR pilot plant in Israel was operated for over a year at a mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) range of 2.8–10.6 g/L. The MBR achieved removal rates comparable to those of a CAS-UF plant at the Tel-Aviv wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) for macrolide antibiotics such as roxythromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin and slightly higher removal rates than the CAS-UF for sulfonamides. A laboratory scale MBR unit in Berlin – at an MLSS of 6–9 g/L – showed better removal rates for macrolide antibiotics, trimethoprim, and 5-tolyltriazole compared to the CAS process of the Ruhleben sewage treatment plant (STP) in Berlin when both were fed with identical quality raw wastewater. The Berlin CAS exhibited significantly better benzotriazole removal and slightly better sulfamethoxazole and 4-tolyltriazole removal than its MBR counterpart. Pilot MBR tests (MLSS of 12 g/L) in Aachen, Germany, showed that operating flux significantly affected the resulting membrane fouling rate, but the removal rates of dissolved organic matter and of bisphenol A were not affected.


2021 ◽  
Vol 415 ◽  
pp. 128765
Author(s):  
Fuqiang Fan ◽  
Ronghua Xu ◽  
Depeng Wang ◽  
Junshi Tao ◽  
Yifeng Zhang ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 337-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Maria Lotito ◽  
Marco De Sanctis ◽  
Claudio Di Iaconi ◽  
Giovanni Bergna

2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Lubello ◽  
R. Gori

Textile industries carry out several fiber treatments using variable quantities of water, from five to forty times the fiber weight, and consequently generate large volumes of wastewater to be disposed of. Membrane Bio-reactors (MBRs) combine membrane technology with biological reactors for the treatment of wastewater: micro or ultrafiltration membranes are used for solid-liquid separation replacing the secondary settling of the traditional activated sludge system. This paper deals with the possibility of realizing a new section of one existing WWTP (activated sludge+clariflocculation+ozonation) for the treatment of treating textile wastewater to be recycled, equipped with an MBR (76 l/s as design capacity) and running in parallel with the existing one. During a 4-month experimental period, a pilot-scale MBR proved to be very effective for wastewater reclamation. On average, removal efficiency of the pilot plant (93% for COD, and over 99% for total suspended solids) was higher than the WWTP ones. Color was removed as in the WWTP. Anionic surfactants removal of pilot plant was lower than that of the WWTP (90.5 and 93.2% respectively), while the BiAS removal was higher in the pilot plant (98.2 vs. 97.1). At the end cost analysis of the proposed upgrade is reported.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document