Temporary Orthodontic Anchorage Devices

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-107
Author(s):  
PS Vijayalakshmi ◽  
AS Veereshi

ABSTRACT Efficient anchorage control is one of the important requisites for successful orthodontic treatment. The conventional means of anchorage control have been the use of transpalatal /lingual arch and palatal button but disadvantage is they do not provide absolute anchorage. Though the use of headgear provide efficient anchorage control, the patients are not compliant in using a headgear. Orthodontic implants have provided us with noncompliant and efficient means of anchorage control. This article traces the journey of development of implants as temporary anchorage devices.

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 95-102
Author(s):  
Fernando Gianzanti Peres ◽  
◽  
Luis Eduardo Marques Padovan ◽  
Leandro Eduardo Kluppel ◽  
Gustavo Calvalcanti Albuquerque ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Introduction: Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) have been developed to be used as direct adjuncts in orthodontic treatment and have facilitated treatment of more complex orthodontic cases, including patients with dental impaction. Objectives: This clinical case reports the applicability of TADs in the orthodontic treatment of a patient with impacted mandibular second molars. Surgical and orthodontic procedures related to the use of miniplates were also discussed in this study. Conclusions: The use of temporary anchorage devices, such as miniplates, can be suggested as an alternative to treat patients with impacted mandibular second molars.


2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
Alexandru Mircea Nicolau ◽  
◽  
Elisabeta Vasilescu ◽  
Viorica Milicescu ◽  
Vlad Gabriel Vasilescu ◽  
...  

Orthodontic implants, called mini-implants or temporary anchorage devices, have been designed to meet the needs of orthodontic biomechanics. Having the goal of providing resistance to unwanted tooth movements, anchorage is chosen according to the main factors that influence the quality of orthodontic care. Of these, local factors such as bone quality, space, thickness of the gum, etc. should be correlated with those watching the mini-implant design, geometric and dimensional factors that are taken into account for the stability of the mini-implant. This paper summarizes some of the results of the research aimed to analyze the main factors of stability of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage and how to measure it using the mini-implants (design shape and dimensions) and a special equipment for testing the tensile strenghth.


2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-164
Author(s):  
Tina Pajevic ◽  
Jovana Juloski ◽  
Marija Zivkovic

Introduction. Orthodontic treatment of Class II Division 1 (II/1) malocclusions in adults can be challenging since skeletal effects are limited. Possible treatment options are orthodontic camouflage or orthognatic surgery, in severe cases. The aim of this paper was to present a successful management of Class II malocclusion in an adult patient using temporary anchorage devices (TADs). Case report. After detailed clinical examination, study models and cephalometric analysis, a 26 years old patient was diagnosed with Class II malocclusion, an overjet of 12 mm, congenitally missing tooth 41 and midline shifted to the right in upper dental arch. In prior orthodontic treatment, patient had upper premolars extracted. Posterior teeth in upper left quadrant were shifted mesially. The camouflage treatment was considered, using temporary anchorage devices (TADs) to distalize posterior teeth on the left side, and gain space for incisor retraction and midline correction in upper dental arch. Results. Using TADs as additional anchorage in anterior region and coil spring for molar distalization, the space was made for tooth 23, midline correction and incisor retraction. After 40 months, a satisfactory result was achieved, overjet and midline correction, class I canines occlusion and class II molar occlusion. Conclusion. Class II/1 malocclusion in adults can be successfully treated using TADs. The success depends on the severity of malocclusion and patient cooperation.


2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susiane Allgayer ◽  
Deborah Platcheck ◽  
Ivana Ardenghi Vargas ◽  
Raphael Carlos Drumond Loro

INTRODUCTION: The early orthodontic treatment allows correction of skeletal discrepancies by growth control, and the elimination of deleterious habits, which are risk factors for the development of malocclusions, favoring for the correction of tooth positioning later in a second treatment stage. During development of teeth and occlusion, the mandibular second molars commonly erupt in the oral cavity after all other teeth of the anterior region. In their eruptive process there may be a condition known as tooth impaction, which precludes its complete eruption and requires proper uprighting treatment. The temporary anchorage devices allow disimpaction and movement of these teeth directly to their final position, without the need of patient compliance or reaction movements in other parts of the arch. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims at describing a case report of the treatment of a patient with Angle Class II malocclusion, performed in two phases, in which mini-implants were used for uprighting the impacted mandibular second molars.


2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 1188-1196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Jane Chen ◽  
Hao-Hueng Chang ◽  
Hsing-Yi Lin ◽  
Eddie Hsian-Hua Lai ◽  
Hsin-Chia Hung ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Takaki ◽  
Naoki Tamura ◽  
Masae Yamamoto ◽  
Nobuo Takano ◽  
Takahiko Shibahara ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 9669-9679

To describe the management of a case with skewed dental arches and midlines deviation using a novel approach based on temporary anchorage devices (TADs) to derogate the deviated arches by unilateral total arch mesialization. This study presents the treatment course of a 25-year-old man undergone a previous improper orthodontic treatment with unnecessary extraction of the upper and lower right first premolar teeth leading to asymmetric dental arches. The patient complained of dental crowding, an unaesthetic smile arch, and the maxillary and mandibular dental midline deviation. The proposed treatment plan goals were decrowding and correction of both arches asymmetry and achievement of coincident upper and lower dental midlines. The corrective treatment plan consisted of total arch mesialzation in both dental arches using an innovative TAD assisted jig. The overall treatment was accomplished in 28 months with significant improvement in facial aesthetic and reasonable periodontal status. This innovative clinical biomechanical setup of miniscrew-anchored sliding jig helped us achieve all the treatment goals (total dental arches mesialization, dental midline deviation correction, and ideal final aesthetic and occlusion) in a reasonable period of time. With proper planning, innovative designs based on TADs are effective alternatives in challenging cases such as uni or bilateral dental arches mesialization, and dental asymmetry correction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document