Bone Augmentation by the Dredging Method for Dental Implant Placement in Alveolar Bone Resorbed due to a Postoperative Maxillary Cyst

Bones and teeth are the only structureswithin the body where calciumandphosphate participate asfunctional pillars. Despite their mineralnature, both organs are vital and dynamic. The aim was to remark the indications for alveolar augmentation after tooth extraction and prior the placement of endoosseous dental implants. The autograft, allograft, alloplast, and xenograftmaterials all have reported success, alone or in combination,for particulate bone augmentation. Theparticulate autograft is the gold standard for mostcraniofacial bone grafting, including the treatmentof dental implant–related defects. Advantages of alveolar ridge augmentation with sufficient bone volume to adjust for uncompromised and esthetic implant placement, renders these procedures more than effective for majority of patients. Surgical reconstruction of the tissues and the procedure of ridge augmentation and subsequent placement of dental implant are necessary.

Download Full-text

Vitamin D3 in Alveolar Bone Augmentation Performed Simultaneously with Dental Implant placement. A Controlled Clinical and Radiographic Study

Egyptian Dental Journal ◽

10.21608/edj.2019.74776 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 65 (4) ◽

pp. 3375-3392

Author(s):

Ahmed Amr

Keyword(s):

Dental Implant ◽

Vitamin D3 ◽

Alveolar Bone ◽

Bone Augmentation ◽

Radiographic Study ◽

Implant Placement

Download Full-text

Effect of human neural crest-related stem cell homing (hNCSCs homing) on vertical alveolar bone augmentation and immediate implant placement

10.26226/morressier.5ac3832b2afeeb00097a3967 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Wolf-Dieter Grimm

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Neural Crest ◽

Alveolar Bone ◽

Bone Augmentation ◽

Cell Homing ◽

Implant Placement ◽

Stem Cell Homing ◽

Immediate Implant

Download Full-text

Current approach to bone augmentation with allogeneic cortical graft: A case report

International Dental Research ◽

10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.44 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (Suppl. 1) ◽

pp. 299-302

Author(s):

Utku Nezih Yılmaz ◽

Fatma Eriş Derkuş

Keyword(s):

Case Report ◽

Dental Implant ◽

Soft Tissues ◽

Alveolar Bone ◽

Healing Process ◽

Bone Defects ◽

Current Approach ◽

Autogenous Bone ◽

Bone Augmentation ◽

Alveolar Crest

Aim: Today, dental implant applications have become the most preferred option in the treatment of tooth deficiencies. Long-term successful results in dental implant applications depend largely on the volume and quality of the hard and soft tissues in the relevant region. Insufficient soft tissues and alveolar crest resorption complicate implant applications. Grafts and additional surgical procedures are required to compensate for resorption and to provide bone augmentation. Shell technique, one of the augmentation methods used in the treatment of alveolar bone defects, is an important procedure for guided bone regeneration. The purpose of this case report is to describe the treatment of vertical and horizontal bone loss with the Shell technique using allogeneic cortical grafts. Methodology: A 58-year-old female patient without any systemic disease was admitted to our clinic with the complaint of tooth loss in the right posterior mandibular region. In the intraoral and radiological examinations, it was determined that the bone volume in the relevant region was not sufficient for dental implant. Two-stage surgical treatment was planned for the patient. First, vertical and horizontal bone defects were augmented with allogeneic cortical graft application under local anesthesia. After the healing process, dental implants were placed in the sufficient volume of the alveolar bone and the patient's treatment was completed. Conclusion: Allogeneic grafts in the treatment of alveolar crest defects; it is a good alternative to autogenous bone grafts,there is no need for a second surgical field and the resulting reduction in morbidity. How to cite this article: Eriş Derkuş F, Yılmaz UN. Current approach to bone augmentation with allogeneic cortical graft: A case report. Int Dent Res 2021;11(Suppl.1):299-302. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.44 Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.

Download Full-text

New Implant Design with Midcrestal and Apical Wing Thread for Increased Implant Stability in Single Postextraction Maxillary Implant

Case Reports in Dentistry ◽

10.1155/2019/9529248 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2019 ◽

pp. 1-4 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Antonio Scarano ◽

Bartolomeo Assenza ◽

Francesco Inchingolo ◽

Filiberto Mastrangelo ◽

Felice Lorusso

Keyword(s):

Cortical Bone ◽

Dental Implant ◽

Alveolar Bone ◽

Primary Stability ◽

Implant Design ◽

Insertion Torque ◽

Fixture Design ◽

Implant Stability ◽

Implant Placement ◽

Immediate Placement

Background. The immediate placement of a dental implant could represent an option treatment for the rehabilitation of a postextractive missing tooth socket to replace compromised or untreatable teeth, with the advantage of single-session surgery. In this way, the anatomy of the alveolar bone defect, the preservation of the buccal cortical bone, and the primary stability of the fixture represent the critical factors that consent a precise implant placement. Objective. This case report describes a novel fixture design for postextractive alveolar socket immediate implant. Methods. Two patients (25 and 31 years old) were treated for postextractive dental implant placement to replace both central upper incisor teeth with four implants. The residual bone implant gap was not filled with graft or bone substitute. The restoration was provided following a standard loading protocol by a cement-sealed prosthetic abutment. Results. Clinically, all implants positioned showed an excellent insertion torque. No postoperative complications were reported. At 6 months of healing, the buccal cortical bone and the implant stability were present and well maintained. Conclusion. The evidence of this study allows us to underline the possible advantages of this new fixture design for postextractive implant technique.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal of Dental Research ◽

10.1177/0022034520905660 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 99 (4) ◽

pp. 402-409 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

G. Avila-Ortiz ◽

M. Gubler ◽

M. Romero-Bustillos ◽

C.L. Nicholas ◽

M.B. Zimmerman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Tooth Extraction ◽

Alveolar Bone ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Control Group ◽

Ridge Preservation ◽

Alveolar Ridge ◽

Bone Augmentation ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Implant Placement ◽

Alveolar Ridge Preservation

Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) therapy is indicated to attenuate the physiologic resorptive events that occur as a consequence of tooth extraction with the purpose of facilitating tooth replacement therapy. This randomized controlled trial was primarily aimed at testing the efficacy of ARP as compared with unassisted socket healing. A secondary objective was to evaluate the effect that local phenotypic factors play in the volumetric reduction of the alveolar bone. A total of 53 subjects completed the study. Subjects were randomized into either the control group, which involved only tooth extraction (EXT n = 27), or the experimental group, which received ARP using a combination of socket grafting with a particulate bone allograft and socket sealing with a nonabsorbable membrane (dPTFE) following tooth extraction (ARP n = 26). A set of clinical, linear, volumetric, implant-related, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed during a 14-wk healing period. All linear bone assessments (horizontal, midbuccal, and midlingual reduction) revealed that ARP is superior to EXT. Likewise, volumetric bone resorption was significantly higher in the control group (mean ± SD: EXT = −15.83% ± 4.48%, ARP = −8.36% ± 3.81%, P < 0.0001). Linear regression analyses revealed that baseline buccal bone thickness is a strong predictor of alveolar bone resorption in both groups. Interestingly, no significant differences in terms of soft tissue contour change were observed between groups. Additional bone augmentation to facilitate implant placement in a prosthetically acceptable position was deemed necessary in 48.1% of the EXT sites and only 11.5% of the ARP sites ( P < 0.004). Assessment of perceived postoperative discomfort at each follow-up visit revealed a progressive decrease over time, which was comparable between groups. Although some extent of alveolar ridge remodeling occurred in both groups, ARP therapy was superior to EXT as it was more efficacious in the maintenance of alveolar bone and reduced the estimated need for additional bone augmentation at the time of implant placement (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01794806).

Download Full-text