Traumatic Brain Injury and Driving Assessment: An Evidence-Based Literature Review

2009 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 580-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Classen ◽  
C. Levy ◽  
D. McCarthy ◽  
W. C. Mann ◽  
D. Lanford ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 79-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Haarbauer-Krupa

AbstractPurpose: The purpose of this article is to inform speech-language pathologists in the schools about issues related to the care of children with traumatic brain injury.Method: Literature review of characteristics, outcomes and issues related to the needs serving children.Results: Due to acquired changes in cognition, children with traumatic brain injury have unique needs in a school setting.Conclusions: Speech-Language Pathologists in the school can take a leadership role with taking care of children after a traumatic brain injury and coordination of medical and educational information.


Author(s):  
Berje H. Shammassian ◽  
Andrew Ronald ◽  
Arvin Smith ◽  
Martha Sajatovic ◽  
Halinder Mangat ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 92 (8) ◽  
pp. A11.2-A11
Author(s):  
Ewelina de Leon ◽  
Graeme Yorston

Objectives/AimsTraumatic brain injury is a common cause of permanent or long-term disability,1 and up to 80% of people with moderate to severe brain injury have some degree of pituitary insufficiency. Endocrine disruption has been documented in medical literature since the 1940s,2-4 where central diabetes insipidus has been described as a common transient complication which causes polydipsia (insatiable thirst). However, polydipsia can be caused by other conditions. It is classified into dipsogenic, in a syndrome of disordered thirst-regulating mechanism in patients without psychiatric disease called dipsogenic diabetes insipidus, psychogenic, as a compulsive water drinking in patients with psychiatric conditions referred to as psychogenic polydipsia or psychogenic diabetes insipidus and iatrogenic where large quantities of water are consumed for health benefits. All of which are referred to as primary polydipsia if these conditions cannot be distinguished. Dipsogenic diabetes insipidus and psychogenic polydipsia can be easily mixed up, misdiagnosed or even unrecognised, mainly because their pathophysiology is still unclear. Are these conditions different, or is there anything that can relate them to each other? With this literature review, we are aiming to find the link between subsets of polydipsia after brain trauma, to compare proposed differential diagnosis and their functionality in clinical settings.MethodA literature review was conducted following a search of MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycBooks, APA PsycInfo databases from 1858 onwards.ResultsWe will present our findings from the literature review.ConclusionPolydipsia is a common clinical problem and requires careful evaluation and management to prevent long term neurological sequelae, and there are no evidence-based treatment guidelines.References National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (2019). Head Injury. CG176. Retrieved from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg176 Escamilla RF, Lisser H. Simmonds disease: A clinical study with revie of the literature; Differentiation from anorexia nervosa by statistical analysis of 595 cases, 101 of which were provided pathologically. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 1942;2(2):6596. Porter RJ, Miller RA. Diabetes insipidus following closed head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1946;11:528562. Webb NE, Little B, Loupee-Wilson S, Power EM. Traumatic brain injury and neuro-endocrine disruption: medical and psychosocial rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation (Reading, Mass.) 2014;34(4):625636.


SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A314-A315
Author(s):  
Bridget Cotner ◽  
Risa Nakase-Richardson ◽  
Becky Gius ◽  
Lauren Fournier ◽  
Alexa Watach ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is prevalent after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and may diminish recovery when left untreated. Despite the demonstrated importance of treating OSA following TBI, assessment for OSA during or soon after inpatient rehabilitation for TBI is limited. Little is known about barriers to implementing OSA screening and early diagnosis during inpatient rehabilitation thus hindering the translation of evidence-based OSA assessment procedures into clinical practice and potentially delaying necessary OSA treatment. The current analysis explored facilitators and barriers to implementing OSA screening tools in an inpatient rehabilitation setting from the perspectives of end user stakeholders. Methods Patients, families, industry, clinical providers and administrators participated in a two-day meeting following completion of a diagnostic clinical trial of OSA screening and diagnostic tools during inpatient rehabilitation. Stakeholders were provided with open ended questions generated by study investigators and given the opportunity to respond on paper or a “graffiti wall” (i.e., white board). Example questions include “What are the greatest needs of the healthcare system related to sleep apnea and TBI?” and “What are the key things we need to consider to move results into real-world practice?” Qualitative content analyses using a rapid matrix approach were conducted from stakeholder feedback obtained during the two-day meeting, which included a guided review of emerging OSA research and discussion of potential implementation barriers of OSA assessment during inpatient rehabilitation. Results Improved screening and treatment practices for OSA were the greatest needs identified. To meet these needs, stakeholders identified the importance of improving patient, family, and staff understanding of OSA (e.g., health literacy) and other sleep disorders through education; inpatient rehabilitation access to resources (technology; sleep providers); and reimbursement for additional inpatient procedures. Conclusion Although treatment of OSA is crucial for recovery during inpatient rehabilitation following TBI, barriers to earlier recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of OSA exists across several different domains, including education, resources, and funding policies. Findings support future implementation efforts to translate evidence-based care into practice to improve patient outcomes. Support (if any) PCORI-NCT03033901


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document