scholarly journals A gg not gh-cancellative semistar operation which is an extension of a star operation

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (0) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Ryûki Matsuda
2003 ◽  
Vol 02 (01) ◽  
pp. 21-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. FONTANA ◽  
P. JARA ◽  
E. SANTOS

Starting from the notion of semistar operation, introduced in 1994 by Okabe and Matsuda [49], which generalizes the classical concept of star operation (cf. Gilmer's book [27]) and, hence, the related classical theory of ideal systems based on the works by W. Krull, E. Noether, H. Prüfer, P. Lorenzen and P. Jaffard (cf. Halter–Koch's book [32]), in this paper we outline a general approach to the theory of Prüfer ⋆-multiplication domains (or P⋆MDs), where ⋆ is a semistar operation. This approach leads to relax the classical restriction on the base domain, which is not necessarily integrally closed in the semistar case, and to determine a semistar invariant character for this important class of multiplicative domains (cf. also J. M. García, P. Jara and E. Santos [25]). We give a characterization theorem of these domains in terms of Kronecker function rings and Nagata rings associated naturally to the given semistar operation, generalizing previous results by J. Arnold and J. Brewer ]10] and B. G. Kang [39]. We prove a characterization of a P⋆MD, when ⋆ is a semistar operation, in terms of polynomials (by using the classical characterization of Prüfer domains, in terms of polynomials given by R. Gilmer and J. Hoffman [28], as a model), extending a result proved in the star case by E. Houston, S. J. Malik and J. Mott [36]. We also deal with the preservation of the P⋆MD property by ascent and descent in case of field extensions. In this context, we generalize to the P⋆MD case some classical results concerning Prüfer domains and PvMDs. In particular, we reobtain as a particular case a result due to H. Prüfer [51] and W. Krull [41] (cf. also F. Lucius [43] and F. Halter-Koch [34]). Finally, we develop several examples and applications when ⋆ is a (semi)star given explicitly (e.g. we consider the case of the standardv-, t-, b-, w-operations or the case of semistar operations associated to appropriate families of overrings).


Author(s):  
Gyu Whan Chang

AbstractLet D be an integrally closed domain, $$\{V_{\alpha }\}$$ { V α } be the set of t-linked valuation overrings of D, and $$v_c$$ v c be the star operation on D defined by $$I^{v_c} = \bigcap _{\alpha } IV_{\alpha }$$ I v c = ⋂ α I V α for all nonzero fractional ideals I of D. In this paper, among other things, we prove that D is a $$v_c$$ v c -Noetherian domain if and only if D is a Krull domain, if and only if $$v_c = v$$ v c = v and every prime t-ideal of D is a maximal t-ideal. As a corollary, we have that if D is one-dimensional, then $$v_c = v$$ v c = v if and only if D is a Dedekind domain.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (08) ◽  
pp. 1650149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Said El Baghdadi ◽  
Marco Fontana ◽  
Muhammad Zafrullah

Let [Formula: see text] be an integral domain with quotient field [Formula: see text]. Call an overring [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] a subring of [Formula: see text] containing [Formula: see text] as a subring. A family [Formula: see text] of overrings of [Formula: see text] is called a defining family of [Formula: see text], if [Formula: see text]. Call an overring [Formula: see text] a sublocalization of [Formula: see text], if [Formula: see text] has a defining family consisting of rings of fractions of [Formula: see text]. Sublocalizations and their intersections exhibit interesting examples of semistar or star operations [D. D. Anderson, Star operations induced by overrings, Comm. Algebra 16 (1988) 2535–2553]. We show as a consequence of our work that domains that are locally finite intersections of Prüfer [Formula: see text]-multiplication (respectively, Mori) sublocalizations turn out to be Prüfer [Formula: see text]-multiplication domains (PvMDs) (respectively, Mori); in particular, for the Mori domain case, we reobtain a special case of Théorème 1 of [J. Querré, Intersections d’anneaux intègers, J. Algebra 43 (1976) 55–60] and Proposition 3.2 of [N. Dessagnes, Intersections d’anneaux de Mori — exemples, Port. Math. 44 (1987) 379–392]. We also show that, more than the finite character of the defining family, it is the finite character of the star operation induced by the defining family that causes the interesting results. As a particular case of this theory, we provide a purely algebraic approach for characterizing P vMDs as a subclass of the class of essential domains (see also Theorem 2.4 of [C. A. Finocchiaro and F. Tartarone, On a topological characterization of Prüfer [Formula: see text]-multiplication domains among essential domains, preprint (2014), arXiv:1410.4037]).


1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. Bloom ◽  
Z. Ésik
Keyword(s):  

We show that, aside from the semiring equations, three equations and two equation schemes characterize the semiring of regular sets with the Kleene star operation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 1850021
Author(s):  
Lokendra Paudel ◽  
Simplice Tchamna

The classical Kronecker function ring construction associates to a domain [Formula: see text] a Bézout domain. Let [Formula: see text] be a subring of a ring [Formula: see text], and let ⋆ be a star operation on the extension [Formula: see text]. In their book [Manis Valuations and Prüfer Extensions II, Lectures Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 2103 (Springer, Cham, 2014)], Knebusch and Kaiser develop a more general construction of the Kronecker function ring of [Formula: see text] with respect to ⋆. We characterize in several ways, under relatively mild assumption on [Formula: see text], the Kronecker function ring as defined by Knebusch and Kaiser. In particular, we focus on the case where [Formula: see text] is a flat epimorphic extension or a Prüfer extension.


1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (15) ◽  
pp. 965-976
Author(s):  
ALFRED DAVIS ◽  
TRISTAN HÜBSCH

A fermionic analogue of the Hodge star operation is shown to have an explicit operator representation in models with fermions, in space–times of any dimension. This operator realizes a conjugation (pairing) not used explicitly in field theory, and induces a metric in the space of wave function(al)s just as in exterior calculus. If made real (hermitian), this induced metric turns out to be identical to the standard one constructed using hermitian conjugation; the utility of the induced complex bilinear form remains unclear.


2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (40) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Aceto ◽  
Willem Jan Fokkink ◽  
Anna Ingólfsdóttir

Multi-exit iteration is a generalization of the standard binary Kleene star operation that allows for the specification of agents that, up to bisimulation equivalence, are solutions of systems of recursion equations of the form<br />X_1 = P_1 X_2 + Q_1 <br /><br /> X_n = P_n X_1 + Q_n <br /><br /> where n is a positive integer, and the P_i and the Q_i are process terms. The addition of multi-exit iteration to Basic Process Algebra (BPA) yields a more expressive language than that obtained by augmenting BPA with the standard binary Kleene star. This note offers an expressiveness hierarchy, modulo bisimulation equivalence, for the family of multi-exit iteration operators proposed by Bergstra, Bethke and Ponse.


1995 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Dobbs ◽  
Evan G. Houston

AbstractLet D be an integral domain, and let X be an analytic indeterminate. As usual, if I is an ideal of D, set It = ∪{JV = (J-1)-1 | J is a nonzero finitely generated subideal of I}; this defines the t-operation, a particularly useful star-operation on D. We discuss the t-operation on R[[X]], paying particular attention to the relation between t- dim(R) and t- dim(R[[X]]). We show that if P is a t-prime of R, then P[[X]] contains a t-prime which contracts to P in R, and we note that this does not quite suffice to show that t- dim(R[[X]]) ≥ t- dim(R) in general. If R is Noetherian, it is easy to see that t- dim(R[[X]]) ≥ t- dim(R), and we show that we have equality in the case of t-dimension 1. We also observe that if V is a valuation domain, then t-dim(V[[X]]) ≥ t- dim(V), and we give examples to show that the inequality can be strict. Finally, we prove that if V is a finite-dimensional valuation domain with maximal ideal M, then MV[[X]] is a maximal t-ideal of V[[X]].


1908 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Peters
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 83-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID E. DOBBS ◽  
PARVIZ SAHANDI

If D ⊆ T is an extension of (commutative integral) domains and ⋆ (resp., ⋆′) is a semistar operation on D (resp., T), we define what it means for D ⊆ T to satisfy the (⋆,⋆′)-GD property. Sufficient conditions are given for (⋆,⋆′)-GD, generalizing classical sufficient conditions for GD such as flatness, openness of the contraction map of spectra and the hypotheses of the classical going-down theorem. If ⋆ is a semistar operation on a domain D, we define what it means for D to be a ⋆-GD domain, generalizing the notion of a going-down domain. In determining whether a domain D is a [Formula: see text] domain, the domain extensions T of D for which [Formula: see text] is tested can be the [Formula: see text]-valuation overrings of D, the simple overrings of D, or all T. P ⋆ MD s are characterized as the [Formula: see text]-treed (resp., [Formula: see text]) domains D which are [Formula: see text]-finite conductor domains such that [Formula: see text] is integrally closed. Several characterizations are given of the [Formula: see text]-Noetherian domains D of [Formula: see text]-dimension 1 in terms of the behavior of the (⋆,⋆′)-linked overrings of D and the ⋆-Nagata rings Na(D,⋆).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document