The Development Of Welfare Reform Policy May 1997–August 1998

Keyword(s):  
2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
George S. Yacoubian ◽  
Ronald J. Peters ◽  
Blake J. Urbach ◽  
Regina J. Johnson

The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) symbolized a comprehensive change to the nation's welfare system. Despite several provisions within PRWORA that focus on the use of illegal drugs, few studies have attempted to identify the prevalence of illegal drug use among welfare recipients. Moreover, no scholarly works have compared rates of drug use in welfare-receiving populations to those of non-welfare-receiving populations with an objective measure of drug use. In the current study, urine specimens were collected from 1,572 arrestees interviewed through Houston's Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in 1999. Drug positive rates are compared between welfare-receiving arrestees ( n = 116), non-welfare receiving arrestees living below the poverty level ( n = 539), and non-welfare receiving arrestees living above the poverty level ( n = 917). Welfare-receiving arrestees were more likely to be female, older, less educated, and to test positive for opiates and benzodiazepines than the other subgroups. Implications for welfare reform policy are discussed in light of the current findings.


2004 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 438-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norma M. Riccucci ◽  
Marcia K. Meyers ◽  
Irene Lurie ◽  
Jun Seop Han

Author(s):  
Ruth Patrick

This chapter introduces readers to the welfare reform policy context in the UK, exploring the reform trajectory taken over the past 35 years. It highlights the dominant construction of the ‘welfare’ policy problem, and the central place that welfare conditionality then plays in the posited policy solution. The ways in which welfare reform is frequently defended with a recourse to a stigmatising narrative around ‘welfare dependency’ is detailed, as is the central role now played by Poverty Porn – television shows that purport to show the ‘real’ picture of life on benefits. Recent reforms by Cameron’s Government are outlined, with a particular focus on those changes that affected individuals interviewed for this research. It is argued that a ‘framing consensus on ‘welfare’ today operates, with ‘welfare’ and those who receive it seen as inherently and necessarily negative and problematic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document