Health Information, Conflict, and the Right to Health

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-68
Author(s):  
Mir Sajjad Seyed Mousavi ◽  
Vahideh Zarea Gavgani ◽  
Mohammad Ghari Seyed Fatemi ◽  
Mohammad Rasekh ◽  
Mohammad Hossein Zarei ◽  
...  

Health is not lack of disease. It is an incomplete condition of psychological, physical and public welfare. Therefore to benefit from highest norms of healthiness is one of the most fundamental and necessary rights of human being. According to the Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 “Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health, and wellbeing of himself and his family.” United Nations. (2012). This paper reviews the proportion of right to health information in international, regional and national legislations and examines the patients’ right to information in patients’ right charters. This study is qualitative study it reviews the patients right charters to follow the portion of right to right to health information. International, regional, and national conventions along with the patients’ right charters of five countries from the five continents were examined against the right to health and right to health information. The Britain patient’s right charter more than other countries in this study has considered and dealt with right to information, about 4 out of 7 of its total articles refer to right to information. In contrast South Africa was assigned as the country which gives less priority to right to information among the other countries. Four out of 11 articles in the patients’ right charter of this country deals with right to health information. Iranian Patients’ right charter stood in the fourth rank after Britain, US and Australia for respecting the patients’ right to information, 2 out of 5 articles.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 630-635
Author(s):  
Nataliia Khodieieva ◽  

The article analyzes the theoretical aspects of protection as directly subjective civil rights and defines them within the framework of civil relations regarding the information on one's health. A clearer and complete description of the features of the realization of the right to information on one's health in the normatively established system of protection of subjective rights of a person has been obtained. It has been determined that the protection of the right to information on one's health is exercised freely, and the failure of a person to exercise the right to protection is not a ground for termination of this right. It is noted that during the protection of their violated right to health information, the authorized person may perform certain actions that are not related to the appeal to the competent state bodies and are a non-jurisdictional form of protection. The list of actions of an individual to protect the right to information on one's health in the case of a non-jurisdictional form of protection of the above-mentioned right has been systematized.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-89
Author(s):  
Suptendra Nath Sarbadhikari

Mousavi et al. (2013) have correctly noted the importance of information and knowledge, as mentioned in most Charters, for attaining the right to health. The practical administration also needs scientific standards, administrative instructions, and clinical guidelines designed to implement the right to health. The author, in this paper, provides an example of implementation.


Author(s):  
José Florencio F. Lapeña

The World Health Organization Constitution “enshrines the highest attainable standard of health as a fundamental right of every human being. The right to health includes access to timely, acceptable, and affordable health care of appropriate quality … as well as the underlying determinants of health, such as … access to health-related education and information.”1 On the other hand, “social determinants of health can themselves pose barriers to education … and ‘damaged brains and bodies’ cannot learn optimally.”2 While there are no clear-cut solutions to such multifactorial issues involving complex-systems, the sustainable developmental goals of the United Nations development agenda beyond 2015 address both health and education.3   Health research fundamentally underpins the key aspiration of the sustainable development goals to realize universal health coverage.3 It is the responsibility of researchers and publishers to make this research available and accessible to all those who need it, in order to assist policymakers and practitioners to progressively realize the right to health of every global citizen. It would seem that the speed and reach of present-day information and communication technology would have facilitated the dissemination of health information. “However, despite the promises of the information revolution, and some successful initiatives, there is little if any evidence that the majority of health professionals in the developing world are any better informed than they were 10 years ago.”4 This observation made over a decade ago still holds true today.   How can we advance access to health information and publication in our current “glocal” situation?  How can the health information produced by research conducted by our students, residents and fellows, be shared with all those who may need and use the information? The Philipp J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg has been actively pursuing multiple means of ensuring the availability of our research and innovation through traditional means, including indexing on various Index Medici and databases. While our visibility has increased dramatically in the 10 years of my editorship, we need to explore new paradigms, trends and innovations, especially with regard the social media. This includes using Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and RSS feeds, to name a few. It also calls us to consider the transition to a full open access model and adopting Creative Commons licenses.   It is timely that the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Journal Editors (APAME) will explore this very theme of shifting paradigms, trends and innovations in advancing access to health information and publication in the forthcoming APAME2015 Annual Convention and Joint Meeting with the Western Pacific Region Index Medicus at the Sofitel Philippine Plaza and WHO Western Pacific Region Office from August 24-26 (http://apame2015.healthresearch.ph) in conjunction with the Global Health Forum 2015 at the Philippine International Convention Center (http://www.forum2015.org).   Close to a thousand editors, reviewers, authors, researchers, librarians, and publishers of medical journals from Asia Pacific states, local delegates representing various institutions and organizations, including the Department of Science and Technology - Philippine Council for Health Research and Development (PCHRD), Department of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Medical and Health Librarians Association of the Philippines (MAHLAP), the Philippine Medical Association, the Philippine Nursing Association, the Philippine Dental Association and others will exchange ideas in three days of meetings, scientific sessions and workshops.  At the same time, the over 70 conjoint Forum 2015 sessions across 2 tracks covering 6 themes will provide “a platform where several other thousand key global actors in health gather to learn, debate and shape the global agenda on research and innovation for health, to arrive at new solutions that are driving health equity and socio-economic development.”   Whether you are a beginning researcher or a seasoned scientist, a novice trainee or senior subspecialist, a community-based health worker or health policy-maker, there will be something for you to learn and share at these meetings that recognize “people (are) at the center of health research and innovation.” Medical and health professions students, ORL-HNS residents and consultants of all training and academic institutions are particularly enjoined to participate in this rare opportunity that will benefit us as well as the people we serve.     Meet me at the Forum!


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-140
Author(s):  
Gabriela Belova ◽  
Stanislav Pavlov

AbstractThe last decades present a significant development of the economic, social and cultural rights and specifically, the right to health. Until 2000, the right to health has not been interpreted officially. By providing international standards, General Comment No.14 on the right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health has led to wider agreement that the right to health includes the social determinants of health such as access to various conditions, services, goods or facilities that are crucial for its implementation. The Reports of the Special Rapporteur on the right to health within the UN human rights system have contributed to the process of gaining the greater clarity about the right to health. It is obvious that achieving the highest attainable level of health depends on the principle of progressive implementation and the availability of the necessary health resources. The possibility individual complaints to be considered by the Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights was introduced with the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, entered into force in 2013.


Author(s):  
Gillian MacNaughton ◽  
Mariah McGill

For over two decades, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) has taken a leading role in promoting human rights globally by building the capacity of people to claim their rights and governments to fulfill their obligations. This chapter examines the extent to which the right to health has evolved in the work of the OHCHR since 1994, drawing on archival records of OHCHR publications and initiatives, as well as interviews with OHCHR staff and external experts on the right to health. Analyzing this history, the chapter then points to factors that have facilitated or inhibited the mainstreaming of the right to health within the OHCHR, including (1) an increasing acceptance of economic and social rights as real human rights, (2) right-to-health champions among the leadership, (3) limited capacity and resources, and (4) challenges in moving beyond conceptualization to implementation of the right to health.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document